Peer response 1
Hi Jennifer, I do think education about drinking is important on college campuses. The alcohol policy has good intentions. I think that it emphasizing personal responsibility is an excellent strategy. Mainly because as you said these are intended to being about “lifelong goal and values” (Nugent & Jones, pg. 290). The rate of alcohol abuse is so “widespread among college students, that 20% of students are considered heavy drinkers” (Nugent & Jones, pg. 290). Colleges must take steps to try to educate and help students drink responsibly.
In the article “College Presidents Seek Debate on Drinking Age” the issue of lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18 is strongly discussed by college presidents and various organizations and Universities. Even though both parties agree that alcohol abuse in colleges is an extensive problem in schools around the country, college organizations are debating with lawmakers to lower the drinking age. With the intention to reduce driving accidents and deaths due to alcohol abuse, the drinking age was elevated to 21, creating the rejection of many college students and administrators in the country. Lowering the drinking age to 18 would not have much impact in the attitude of young people since there is no much difference in maturity in 3 years. This statement is supported by a Duke University sophomore from Singapore, where the drinking age is lower.
Should College Allow Drinking in Campus? In April 2002 The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism(NIAAA) published a report, updated in 2005, that suggests a strong relationship between alcohol and other drug abuse and variety of negative consequences of students who used alcohol and drug. The report estimates that each year 1,700 college students die from alcohol-related unintentional injuries, including motor vehicle crashes. In addition, it further estimates that alcohol is involved in 599,000 unintentional injuries, 696,000 assaults, and 79,000 cases of sexual assault and acquaintance rape among college students. According to a number of national surveys, about 40% of college and university students engage in heavy episodic
“Huh…that’s interesting,” Zecker said. He was pondering a possibility that UMass has not yet explored in order to draw more people to games: selling alcohol. The lack of alcohol could be a major reason the typical UMass game at McGuirk or Mullins may be full of empty seats. The sale of alcohol on university grounds during sporting events is not illegal; according to USA Today, 32 college football stadiums and multipurpose arenas have recently become wet as of 2014.
You stated, "Most college students attending a 4 year university are under the age of 21." That alone is a good enough reason to lower the drinking age. Most students graduate high school at 17/18 and then go off to a 4 year University. You think it 's okay to not be able to drink until your sophomore/senior year of college? I just do not think it 's reasonable nor realistic.
He states, “Most college kids spend more time drinking than studying. And they still get mostly A’s” (1). In other words, college students are spending their time developing a habit of drinking versus studying or learning. He also argues that the only way to solve this issue is by “implementing policies or guidelines” (2). It has taken a lot of effort from faculty and students to get rid of grade inflation, but schools such as Wellesley College and Reed College have been successful.
He argues that “campus would be brighter” with a bar, he also asserts that the cause of binge drinking among students is the administration’s obsession with alcohol abuse. On the other hand,he insists a campus bar would promote peace and tranquility, relieve stress, and bring in revenue: “if the Student Union were to sell beer, it would also be selling responsible drinking in a saner, more soothing environment, which would make the city, the campus, and everyone else concerned a great deal happier. Of course, the campus would also be a great deal happier with the additional income generated by alcohol sales. The amount taken in would be staggering. And who knows, it would possibly augment parking revenues as well.”
Some might say that the use of alcohol is common place and nothing more than a stepping stone in the ritual of being a college student. The problem is the consequences of binge drinking and excessive drinking should not be accepted as “ritual” or common place. Some consequences are extremely problematic and not only impact the individual but have lasting consequences for the college environment in a global sense.
In an article by David Skorton, previous president of Cornell University and avid anti-hazing activist, it is stated that “Nearly 2,000 alcohol related deaths occur each year among American college students.” He goes on to tell that at Cornell University were two to three times more likely to be involved in an access of alcohol consumption and drug use. (Skorton p. A23) Alcohol misuse can result in “risky sexual behaviors, [acting] irresponsibly at times, and [hurting] academic standing.” (Nuwer p. 57) Many times the abuse of alcohol can prove to be fatal, as it was in the case of Gabriel “Gabe” Higgins of the University of Texas.
Movies and TV shows often glamorize alcohol and overconsumption, as well as expose the simplicity of gaining access to alcohol through means of fake ID’s, stealing, or paying someone of age. Media like the aforementioned usually paints a picture of college being the pipeline to parties that
An argument many people make against banning alcohol is that if alcohol isn’t legal on campus, then students will go off campus. By going off campus they can drink to their hearts desire and they won’t be under supervision. They say that this also creates problems because now students aren’t under adult supervision and can, quite frankly, do what they please. Also people make the argument that colleges should spend more time on alcohol safety and proper use. Although colleges should provide these seminars for students on alcohol, they should also crack down on its usage.
Instead of pretending that prohibition on college campuses is realistic, we should be interested in helping the young adults to make better responsible choices. The age being lowered can teach young adults to monitor them while drinking while in a safe environment. They will also be able to drink in a safer environment without being forced off the campus because of getting caught. The age being lowered can reduce binge drinking in teenage and college students. The drinking age being 18 can lead to healthier drinking habits and teach young adults how to be safe and responsible while drinking in a safe environment instead of hiding it from people and
where there were parents and teachers present. She also talks about how in her days, learning to drink socially and responsibly was part of her college experience, and it was at least partially supervised. They had pubs on campus, and the bartender was paid by the school to serve, and he was also responsible to cut off students who are overdoing it. Supervised drinking on college campuses was done with faculty and staff, who could model the appropriate alcohol-related
There are organizations that surround the colleges and universities, such as, sororities and fraternities. Sororities and fraternities are amongst the general college student’s populations. The members have a high chance of engaging in drinking alcohol and abusing drugs. The reason behind the high risk of drinking alcohol and drug use are other peers or student colleagues peer pressuring students into drinking alcohol and using drugs. It’s very common that sororities and fraternities lure non-Greek organizations students into thinking that drinking alcohol and using drug substances is fun and enjoying what college has to offer.
Underage drinking is common on college campuses around the country. Almost every school has some kind of alcohol culture on campus and even campuses that claim to be dry have drinking. It is the job of the college to provide students with a safe environment to grow and learn, and by allowing students to drink the school is doing exactly the opposite. Carleton’s drinking policy is very open to underage drinking and the policy is hardly ever enforced. Carleton’s policy states, “In a civil, safe, and healthy community, members take responsibility for their own actions, and consider the impact that their choices will have on others.
A national study conducted from 1989-1991 examined 58, 625 student participants from 56 four-year institutions and 22 two-year institutions (Presely, 1993). The research revealed that in four-year institutions, only 1 in 10 students consumed 16 or more drinks per week (Presley, 1993). Moreover, a large portion of the participants, more than one-third, preferred an alcohol-free environment, and 87 percent preferred a drug-free environment (Presley, 1993). In addition, the study found that at both two and four-year institutions, the heaviest drinkers obtained the lowest grades (Presley, 1993). What this research revealed was that there is a minority, problem group that is responsible for the abuse and that the majority of university students prefer a drug-free