What impact does globalization have on identity? Should we try to minimize globalization’s impact on identity, embrace it, or a mixture of both? Globalization can necessarily be a great part of the world if we use it to its highest potential. It could also be detrimental to the community we stand for, furthermore, worldwide. We live in a world where we are driven by time, are we going let it control us is the question.
Global assemblages can take many forms, ranging from neoliberal reforms of public service sectors, to global standards in finance and accounting, to responses to global terrorism, to the global trade in human body parts. Global assemblages are distinctive, however, because they all follow a logic that is fundamentally global, rather than national, such that when they do take effect in national contexts they serve to redefine previously existing social and institutional arrangements, thus prompting ‘a shift in the core dynamics of social, cultural, and economic life’ (2005:
Globalization is a very intricate and expansive concept and there is no universal agreed definition about it; but it can be considered as the process of international integration, which arises from the exchange and trade amongst different countries, of products, commodities, capitals, ideas, views, mutual sharing, and other aspects of culture. It is important to point out that globalization has completely altered the way in which the world operates, and that it has slowly become ingrained in all fields. Valuable lessons from history show that globalization is not a new phenomenon, and that it has not been a smooth process. It has often been characterized, in fact, by periods of accelerated integration (as in the 19th and second half of 20th
Giddens observes, “Consequences of modernity are becoming more radicalized and universalized than before” (Giddens 1990: 3). He implies that globalization is now radicalized and universalized congruently but there are also plenty of instances when these forces are observed to collide against each other. Kaldor rightly says that “The term globalization conceals a complex process which actually involves globalization and localization, integration and fragmentation, homogenization and differentiation” (Kaldor 2001: 71). The Convergence Theory and also the Global Chaos Theory highlight this dichotomy. Convergence Theory asserts that with globalization, distinct systems will become more alike, whilst Global Chaos Theory is saying that globalization imposes a sort of convergence of values, even an imposition of western values, which the ‘rest’ of the world retaliates against
The impacts of globalization can be felt in each city around the globe. Innovation has empowered people and also associations the capacity to inundate themselves into another culture for all intents and purposes at the speed of light. Comprehension of various social orders and societies has turned out to be one of the main procedures of business. Principally there has been a strong focus on understanding the different societies due to its capacity to influence business on a worldwide scale. For example, Coca-Cola and McDonald 's appear to understand immense significance of not managing all societies alike.
One has to understand that the basis of World Culture Theory of Globalization forms from the fact that “globalization is not a monolithic concept but has a multidimensional aspect attached to it”. In order words, it is a complex mixture of homo-genization and hetero-genization. People infer globalized goods and thoughts in diversity and integrate them into their lives in varied traditions. Thus most of the times there happens a tension between the global and the local. The consequences are societies either incorporating the global or annexing the global, selectively to suit the
Globalization, historical and contemporary is a very open concept. Many sides are argued when it comes to globalization when it began, what it has caused and if it is positive or negative on society. All these views make it a difficult concept to discuss because there are so many sides it can be seen from and it is very difficult to find facts because not everyone agrees. Due to the fact that globalization is such an open idea it does allow people to present their own opinion on the matter making all of the material within globalization very exciting to learn about.
There is more than 1000 definition for Globalization all over the world , But the most prominent and widely used definition for it is that " Globalization is a process of integration and interaction among different people, worldwide companies, and governments of different nations, a process driven by international trade and investment and aided by information technology." Which means that globalization is shaping the world in a way that leads to a huge openness and shorten the distance between countries. A lot of people have different opinions about Globalization leading to many debates wondering if it has a good or bad effect on their nations. A s some people see that globalization cause the elimination of cultural identity and privacy
There are many more negative and positive impacts of globalization on culture and globalization will continue to change our lives. We all just need to remember that we should follow our own thoughts than to follow what majority thinks. Globalization does not bereave the exclusiveness of each culture, despite the world becoming more integral and fast-paced in information sharing. The process has its merits and adversity,
It has been part of the movement of history. Globalization has ensured that the old distinctions between international and domestic policies are becoming increasingly irrelevant.7 Globalization “refers to processes whereby many social relations become relatively delinked from territorial geography, so that human lives are increasingly being played out in the world as a single place”.8 Steve Smith and John Baylis conceive of globalization as “the process of increasing interconnectedness between societies such that events in one part of the world more and more have effects on peoples and societies far away.9 Ramesh B. Karky could not have stated the position better when he said succinctly, “it is hard to get a single definition of globalization. ”10 The International Labour Organization defines globalization as a process of growing interdependence between all people of this planet. According to them, people are linked together economically and socially by trade, investments and