Why Is Animal Testing Necessary Evil
Animal Testing: Necessary Evil or Just Evil? It is ironic for humans to find the need to substantiate their stance on being the superior species, when in fact we are all equals in being animals. Does this justify the deeds done in our favour against our unfortunate counterparts? These cruel and inhumane acts are forced upon helpless animals, which had absolutely no say in our ‘courageous’ voyage in the name of science for our own selfish needs. This heated debate questions ethical reasoning and the plausible justifications of such actions taken. In the following, comparison and contrast is drawn from “Conscientious Objection to Harmful Animal Use within Veterinary and Other Biomedical Education” written by Andrew Knight (2014), and “Public …show more content…
Ormandy and A. Schuppli (2014) states that people are also largely affected by the individuals’ prior experience with animals. (p. 4) Hence, there is a direct relation between their experience with animals and how they feel towards animal testing. In their research, it is said that a more negative onset in their earlier years would indirectly cause a more negative outlook on animals, which in turn justifies their stand strongly for animal testing. (p. 5) However, personally I feel that this is very subjective to each individual. There are many other factors that one may be influenced by and a prior experience may not be the sole reason for their stance in animal testing given the extensive experience everyone accumulates with time. It should be taken into consideration that Knight (2014), H. Ormandy and A. Schuppli (2014) all agree that the needs for removing animal research practices are …show more content…
Ormandy and A. Schupppli (2014) believe that there is a need to better understand the current situation of animal testing, but have differing opinions on how they should go about assessing and dealing with the issue. To be able to change the mindsets of the society, Knight (2014) believes that it starts in education. Students themselves should take initiative by submitting documents that are not as objective as how they should be, allowing alternatives to be sourced and prepared to educate the future generations better. (p. 4) However, H. Ormandy and A. Schuppli (2014) believe that we should look at the macro perspective by researching on the public attitudes towards animal testing and regulate the trend towards more justifiable democratic scientific research. (p. 2) Both authors agree that there is space for improvement in terms of how the public can work towards a more democratic view of animal testing. The difference is Knight (2014) believes in working from bottom up, starting with the students or our eventual workforce of the future. While H. Ormandy and A. Schuppli (2014) chooses a more macro perspective of governmental powers to research on facilitating the public. I believe that both authors have their valid points in which both problems should be addressed accordingly. If we attend to both micro and macro needs, we would be able to meet on common grounds much easier as there is mutual understanding and cooperation between
A Rhetorical Analysis Of David Masci's Article On Animal Rights
1750 Words | 7 PagesThe controversy within animal testing has continued to grow splitting the activists from the scientists. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services referred to these supporters as not activists but “terrorists” for hindering their research opportunities (13) Freelance writer, David Masci, attempts to address
Frankie L Trull Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis
743 Words | 3 PagesDiscursive Essay (1st Draft) – Kevin Cho I have detested animal testing ever since I watched a document showing orangutan tortured to death during the animal testing. I was physically and mentally sick when I looked into its eyes. Now, while you are reading this essay, perhaps holding a scrumptious apple pie in your hand, hundreds of, thousands of feeble animals are dying by inhumane animal tests.
Animal Testing Dbq
796 Words | 4 PagesEvery year several million animals die due to animal testing in for medical, psychological, and products research. Moreover, animal testing is something that shouldn’t be continued and for it is completely wrong and cruel. Animal testing started in the late 300’s BC. Aristotle and Erasistratus performed many experiments that involved living animals. Similarly, Galen, a greek physician, conducted animals research to explore the field of anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology.
Tom Regan Animal Rights Summary
1543 Words | 7 PagesIn his work, Tom Regan establishes the rights of animals used in scientific research. He argues that when animals are used as objects of experiment, they are not respected and their inherent value is not acknowledged. Having inherent value, as defined by Regan, is a state, in which a being is not just a vessel, but a being with a complex mental life. All who have inherent value are to have it equally.
Persuasive Speech Animal Testing
1084 Words | 5 PagesSince the value of animal life as a living being should be recognized and to a certain extent equated to the value of human life, the animal experiments raise a range of ethical questions (Armstrong & Botzler,
The Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesAnimal testing has been used by scientists to test drugs and makeup products for many years. They have been kept in labs, poked, prodded at, observed, forced to inhale, eat, and wear substances that have killed them. Millions of animals have died each year because of this testing, and it needs to be stopped. Animal testing should not be continued because it is ineffective, it wastes lives, and is inhumane. Animal testing needs to be discontinued because it is ineffective.
Persuasive Speech On Animal Testing
784 Words | 4 PagesI’m here today to talk about a controversial issue that has been around for a period of time, animal testing. Animal testing using animals in experiments with different chemical substances in everything from medical to cosmetic to determine their safety as well as effectiveness . It’s a problem that has existed since the 3rd and 4th centuries BCE with its merciless methods and painful ways of abusing animals for human demands, but now it’s time for it to stop. Our technology has developed significantly since; therefore, such medieval methods of torturing animals are no longer necessary. Researches have shown that each year, over 100 million animals are tortured and killed in American laboratories alone, including dogs, cats and more; this shows how far out of hand animal testing have gotten.
Animal Testing Benefits
1822 Words | 8 PagesAnimal testing is defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs” (Dictionary.com). This experimentation has been practiced since around 500 BCE, and has allowed the human race to discover many things that otherwise would have not been discovered (ProCon). The use of animal testing has increased, due to its many necessary benefits, such as: helping form vaccinations and uncovering new diseases in the specific species being tested on (AALAS). However, many animal activist groups such as, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), have spoken out against the issue. These groups claim animal testing to be “inhumane”
Persuasive Speech On Animal Testing
1152 Words | 5 PagesAnimal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’
Animal Testing Beneficial Essay
574 Words | 3 PagesAnimals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.
Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing
1067 Words | 5 PagesImagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.
Should Animal Testing Be Allowed Essay
594 Words | 3 PagesWhether this is morally right or wrong, I will present both sides of the argument as well as my opinion. PROS OF ANIMAL TESTING Nearly every nobel Laureate in physiology or medicine since 1901 has relied on animal research. Animal testing has decreased heavily over the years, with not very necessary things like makeup. Without animal testing we wouldn't have the many of the surgerys that we can today such as hip replacement surgery, kidney transplants, heart transplants, or blood transfusions.
Animal Testing Utilitarianism
2744 Words | 11 PagesIntroduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.
Should Animal Testing Be Banned
967 Words | 4 PagesThroughout moral, humanistic, and social perspectives animal testing is beneficial for medical evolution. Animals ' rights are of less moral worth than human rights. Humans are complex beings with large well developed brains, which form sizeable social groups, have significant ability to communicate with one another, and possess desires, preferences and interests about the world. Humans have an awareness of their own existence and mortality, and as such are beings worthy of moral consideration. According to Pycroft (2011), “Without access to live organisms we would know far less bout the function of the cardiovascular, how digestion works…
Iglesias Animal Testing
1010 Words | 5 PagesIza Iglesias and Lorna Collier both discuss their viewpoints on animal testing and provides evidence to support their argument. In the article, “ 8 million signatures needed in fight against animal testing”, Iglesias argues against animal testing while Collier defends it in her article titled, “Defending animal
More about Why Is Animal Testing Necessary Evil
A Rhetorical Analysis Of David Masci's Article On Animal Rights
1750 Words | 7 PagesFrankie L Trull Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis
743 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing Dbq
796 Words | 4 PagesTom Regan Animal Rights Summary
1543 Words | 7 PagesPersuasive Speech Animal Testing
1084 Words | 5 PagesThe Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesPersuasive Speech On Animal Testing
784 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Testing Benefits
1822 Words | 8 PagesPersuasive Speech On Animal Testing
1152 Words | 5 PagesAnimal Testing Beneficial Essay
574 Words | 3 PagesPersuasive Essay On Animal Testing
1067 Words | 5 PagesShould Animal Testing Be Allowed Essay
594 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing Utilitarianism
2744 Words | 11 PagesShould Animal Testing Be Banned
967 Words | 4 PagesIglesias Animal Testing
1010 Words | 5 Pages