Animal testing is defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as food or drugs” (“Animal Testing”). Unfortunately, some cosmetic companies treat animals unethically during testing; this brings into question whether or not the practice of animal testing can be considered ethical, or even necessary, in regards to cosmetic purposes. Those with pro-animal testing views may argue that the practice of testing cosmetics on animals is necessary for human safety, however, with modern advances in technology, there are now more options for alternatives than ever before. With support from major companies and governments, alternatives to animal testing could potentially become the standard in the near future.
Those who support animal testing argue that animal testing in cosmetics is necessary to ensure that the product is safe for human use. They argue that “there is no adequate alternative to testing on a living whole-body system” (“Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing”), and this is why “animals are appropriate research subjects because . . . animals and humans are so biologically similar” (“Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing”). Humans are biologically similar to animals in
…show more content…
The AWA requires research animals to be provided with adequate food and clean water, as well as, regular veterinary care. However, animal testing supporters fail to recognize that “the AWA does not cover rats, mice, fish, and birds, which comprise around 95% of the animals used in research” (“Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing”). This means that the animals typically used in research aren’t protected under the AWA, even though it is commonly perceived that they
Be that as it may, others view these tests as immoral and should be illegal universally. So much so that there are animal activists who protest against the use of animal testing for cosmetics. Similarly, an organization
Protection Animal testing is cruel and inhumane, it should not be acceptable to use animals in scientific research. Vivisection is another term for an animal experimentation including; dissection, administering drugs, brain damaging, and other painful and invasive experiences to animals. According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation("Testing - American Anti-Vivisection Society.") Animals are very different from human-being therefore it can make a poor scientific results. They should not have to suffocate and die to be use in research and cosmetics testing because there are alternative choices and different techniques that could lead to the
Mac Cosmetics, being one of the most popular beauty franchises, will undertake any task possible in order to get the results they need to benefit their company, disregarding the fact that animals are not something disposable. A few damages that occur externally include excessive bleeding, swollen eyelids, and blindness.If that is not enough animals can also experience paralysis, seizures, and occasionally death. Death is never a tragic circumstance to scientists because once the animals are deceased they are cut up to have their organs examined. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), being the largest animal rights contributor, mention the bad science of animal testing by arguing against animal rights with a few common points and counterpoints. “Science has a responsibility to use animals to keep looking for cures for all the horrible diseases that people suffer from”, PETA strongly disagrees by declaring that millions of dollars are spent every year for animal experimentation while statistics show that the United States are the second worst in infant mortality in the developed world.
Purpose: To inform the audience about animal testing I. Introduction A. Attention getting device: Approximately 26 million animals are used every year in US laboratories for cosmetic and biomedical research. B. Thesis: I would like to inform you about how animal testing is conducted. C. Credibility: I have read and studied the articles about animal testing. D. Preview: I am going to share with you purposes of animal testing, how animals are used in laboratory tests, and the effectiveness of animal testing.
On June 23, 2015, Congress urged to ban any cruel animal testing in the United States of America. If the passage of the Humane Cosmetics Act were to happen, then the United States would fall in line with more than thirty other countries that have already implemented similar bans. While our
"If it 's proven to reduce suffering through animals tests, it 's not wrong to use them. To say cosmetics is an absolute evil is absurd. " The Canadian Federal of Human Societies states that all cosmetic companies in Canada are required to confirm the safety of their products. Scientific research shows that animals and humans are very similar in terms of DNA and genetics. Although animal experimentation is not required and the research conducted is often unreliable, this proves why animals are the perfect testing subjects.
Animal testing has been used by scientists to test drugs and makeup products for many years. They have been kept in labs, poked, prodded at, observed, forced to inhale, eat, and wear substances that have killed them. Millions of animals have died each year because of this testing, and it needs to be stopped. Animal testing should not be continued because it is ineffective, it wastes lives, and is inhumane. Animal testing needs to be discontinued because it is ineffective.
Animal testing is not only in research but in cosmetic products. ”American women use an average of 12 personal care products per day, so product safety is of great importance... The US Food and Drug Administration endorses the use of animal tests on cosmetics to assure the safety of a product or ingredient.” (ProCon.org, 9) Products that aren't cruelty free are being used daily in average personal routines. The choice to test on an animal first has helped cosmetic chemists to make more safe and efficient products for consumers.
Henceforth, as animal testing increased, so did the controversy surrounding it (“Animal testing,” n.d.). Moreover, with the help of animal testing, various treatments and medicines are developed for unconventional diseases. Although animal testing may seem ruthless, animals are used for experimental research that contributes to science if there are no other possible substitutes. Animal testing is a debatable topic that still continues to be one until this time. Animal experimentation should persist because it saves human’s life from diseases, ensures cosmetics’ safety, and improves medical
The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) of United States gives some protections to warm-blooded animals used in research laboratories, which only cover 5% of animals normally used for testing. Under AWA, all testing on animals which are covered must minimized the pain on animals and provide appropriate veterinary care. The AWA should make further improvements which cover as much animals as possible. In UK, the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 defined regulated procedures as animal experiments that could potentially cause "pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm”. It prevents animals from unnecessary suffering.
This proves how immoral it is to test on animals especially since the law does not require the cosmetics to be tested. The most plausible answer for why the animals are being tested on is a business wants to make money and if the business cosmetic is unsafe and harms one human then no one is going to want to buy another cosmetic from that business. This could leave a business with no
The inhumane act of testing products on virtuous and uninvolved animals needs to be recalled and eliminated. This belief has caused many disputes and debates for me. Animal testing has pros and cons such as any other controversial topic. This practice has granted science with many life-saving cures and treatments, but the use of animals for finding issues in products recently became unnecessary. New sciences and abilities of medicine around the world allow a different approach such as experimenting with human cells, rather a living organism.
Each year in the United States, millions of animals are hurt or killed in the name of science by private institutions, household companies, cosmetics companies, government agencies, and scientific centers. These companies put these animals though harsh and inhumane conditions for testing. Medical testing should not harm the lives of many harmless animals because it is ineffective, irrelevant, and cruel. Animal testing is outdated and ineffective. In the article,”Stop animal testing - it's not just cruel, it's ineffective”, it reads,”There are safer alternatives to animal testing.
It is true that animal testing requires a lot of investment. Not only that money is spent on advanced technologies, it is also spent to pay for scientists’ expertise on this particular field. In order for the scientists to do their research, they need suitable equipment and substances. Every year, the National institutes of Health finances between $12 billion to $14.5 billion on animal testing as indicated in a study done by the government (Bastach, 2013). Besides, scientists need to consider the fact that animals need to be sheltered, fed and cared for to keep them alive.
Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.