Animal testing is cruel, unjust, and wasteful, and it needs to stop. It is used to test cosmetics, to gain scientific knowledge, and for tests in schools. The Humane Society states that animal testing is tests performed on live animals for basic biology, medicinal, safety, or health research. Even small procedures have the capabilities to cause the animal high stress or discomfort. Some animals are used in future experiments, but most are killed soon after the tests. (About Animal Testing) The animals are often raised in captivity, specifically for experimentation and are killed after the tests. In the article “New Technologies Could Eliminate the Need for Animal Experimentation”, Andrew Rowan writes that animals are used for testing drugs, …show more content…
Those statistics come from the US Department of Agriculture (New Technologies). Many argue that animal testing is not helpful and unnecessary. According to Andrew Rowan, “Aside from the ethical issues [animal testing] pose[s]--inflicting both physical as well as psychological distress and suffering on large numbers of sentient creatures--animal tests are time- and resource-intensive . . . provide little understanding of how chemicals behave in the body, and . . . do not correctly predict real-world human reactions.” (New Technologies) The animals in labs behave differently and more strangely than animals in the wild, and it is regarded as normal. One career researcher assumed that monkeys rocking back and forth in captivity is something that “they just do” (New Technologies). The animals are emotionally stresses, which can upset the results of the experiments- yet another reason why we should not use animals in laboratory tests. “They experience ongoing mental and physical suffering from the endless boredom. Confinement, fear, and emotional stress of daily laboratory life. Add to this fear and agony of a procedure, and only then can we start to understand the desperation and pain in which they live, every day—and for most, their entire lives.” (New …show more content…
About 6-12 million animals are killed for dissection annually in the US. Some schools use “ethically sourced” animals, including by-products of the food industry, like pigs, or cats that were euthanized in shelters. However, the most commonly used animal used in dissection labs, frogs, are raised specifically to be killed and sent to schools for dissection. Sharks and many varieties of fish that have been captured and killed are also sold biological supply companies for money. (Dissection in the classroom). Students do not need dissection to gain knowledge. Dissection also has negative consequences on the environment. The local frog populations in many states and countries are growing dangerously small. This has caused some places including Michigan, Wisconsin, and Canada to outlaw the harvesting of frogs (Dissection in the Classroom). Dissection is teaching students that animal life in unimportant. “Educators that insist on using animal specimens rather than non-animal alternatives as teaching tools miss a valuable opportunity to teach their students about humane education and are not implementing the 3R’s principle—reduction, refinement, and replacement—regarding the use of animals” (Dissection in the
Evidence shows people are doing harmful things to these animals in order for them to be dissected. Undercover investigations have documented cases of animal abuse. Dealer and biological supply companies buy live or dead animals that have been captured off the streets. This is why large amounts of students feel uncomfortable with the use of animals in dissection. This proves that there should be a change in animals that are used.
These scenes might be familiar to you if you ever dissected an animal. Animal dissections in schools have been done for a long time, but concerns about animal rights and long-term adverse psychological effects have stopped the practice in recent years. With some student clubs having activities focused on dissection of animals, including Zootomia and SM, some concerns have been raised by teachers and students. I believe that dissection is not a necessary curriculum but it should not be banned. However, it must be done in a controlled environment where students can think about the moral and ethical issues surrounding the practice.
There are over six million animals killed for the dissection industry each year. Majority of these animals are specifically born and bred for experimentation. This puts a premium price on animal life that some people are just not comfortable paying. Many students report that after they cut the animal up they do not remember learning anything about what they did or why. This shows that we are killing animals in schools for nothing because it doesn’t help the majority of the children learn.
About 26 million animals are used for testing every year in the United States. Some people say that animal testing has contributed too many lifesaving cures, whereas others believe would believe animal testing is cruel. Animal testing is any scientific experiment or test in which a live animal is forced to undergo something, such as medical treatments, to determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Which can be harmful towards the animals and beneficial to humans. Animal testing has contributed too many life-saving cures and treatments.
"It is estimated that more than 115 million animals worldwide are used in laboratory experiments every year. In the United States, up to 90 percent of the animals used in laboratories are excluded from the official statistics. Although these animals still endure the stressed and deprivations of life in the sterile laboratory environment, their lives are not recorded in official statistics (“About Animal
Do you know that a lot of the products we use on a daily basis involve some type of animal testing? Products that we use every single day are tested on animals such as Windex, Post-it notes, and even Vaseline. Animals have been used for testing since the old ages and a lot of scientists depend on the use of these animals for the development of scientific research. But is the use of animals for scientific purposes really necessary in creating these products? Even though some may say that the use of animal testing has contributed greatly to scientific research it isn 't really worth the risk and torture towards them.
2.0 Body Content 2.1 Reduction A way of justifying animal testing is to reduce the number of animals involved in animal testing. In 1970s, 5.5 million of various animals including chimpanzees, dogs, mice, rabbits, monkeys etc. are involve in the medical research field as test subjects for various experiments (PETA, 2014). However, some experiments were not beneficial to the development of the medical field but cost over a million dollar. In the United States of America, 16 billion dollars had been used on animal experimentation- 1.9 million dollars are used on the experimenting on heart diseases on dogs conducted by Ohio State University, 5 million dollars were used on obesity experiments conducted by Oregon National Primate Research Centre, while 16 million dollars were used by Harvard University to fund 1200 individual experiments on drug addiction by using monkeys as test subjects. Although animals were sacrificed in the experiments, most experiments did not reach its goal due to flaws causing a waste of life (Grant, 2013; Peta, 2014).
Frogs are the most common to be dissected but other popular animals are pigs and cats; many animals rights groups and common people disagree with these practices. PETA, an organization trying to end animal testing points out, “Classroom dissection desensitizes students to the sanctity of life” (Berlatsky). In other words, PETA believes students dissecting animals can make them think it is normal to cut open a live or dead creatures body and look inside
Animal testing has been used by scientists to test drugs and makeup products for many years. They have been kept in labs, poked, prodded at, observed, forced to inhale, eat, and wear substances that have killed them. Millions of animals have died each year because of this testing, and it needs to be stopped. Animal testing should not be continued because it is ineffective, it wastes lives, and is inhumane. Animal testing needs to be discontinued because it is ineffective.
It is wrong to kill animals for scientific purposes because killing of any kind is unethical and animals should be left in their rightful habitat. Although large discoveries may be made from observing killed animals, scientists should make greater efforts to keep their subjects alive and thriving. Captivating animals for studies or entertainment should be seen as animal abuse, and animal abuse should not be condoned under any
Animal testing is defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs” (Dictionary.com). This experimentation has been practiced since around 500 BCE, and has allowed the human race to discover many things that otherwise would have not been discovered (ProCon). The use of animal testing has increased, due to its many necessary benefits, such as: helping form vaccinations and uncovering new diseases in the specific species being tested on (AALAS). However, many animal activist groups such as, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), have spoken out against the issue. These groups claim animal testing to be “inhumane”
A wise man once said, “He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals. ”(Goodreads.com). Animal testing is just a way to treat animals poorly. Scientists are able to be satisfied with themselves as they rub products into an animal's eyes without hesitation.
Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.
Since animal testing is cruel, inhumane, and alternative testing methods now exist, we should discontinue animal testing once and for all. For these reasons, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of human products. To begin with, animal testing is cruel, inhumane and it violates animals’ rights. The USDA reported that in 2016, 71,370 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia at all for relief.
Throughout moral, humanistic, and social perspectives animal testing is beneficial for medical evolution. Animals ' rights are of less moral worth than human rights. Humans are complex beings with large well developed brains, which form sizeable social groups, have significant ability to communicate with one another, and possess desires, preferences and interests about the world. Humans have an awareness of their own existence and mortality, and as such are beings worthy of moral consideration. According to Pycroft (2011), “Without access to live organisms we would know far less bout the function of the cardiovascular, how digestion works…