Why Is Animal Testing Wrong
Katherine Goddin
Shea
9 Honors LA
28 January 2016
The Unheard Screams Behind the Creams
About one hundred million animals each year are killed in the U.S. laboratories for curiosity driven experimentation, medical training, chemical, drug, and cosmetic testing. In these laboratories, some are forced to inhale toxic fumes, some have holes drilled into their skulls, and others have their skin burned off, or even their spinal cords compressed. In addition to the inhumane treatment of these experiments, animals are deprived of everything they have and everything that is natural to them. They are isolated from their families, confined to cages, and traumatized day after day. The innocent animals who are unwillingly used in these experiments
…show more content…
Peter Singer explains and clarifies why animals should have rights when he writes, “The capacity for suffering is not just another characteristic like the capacity for language or higher mathematics. All animals have the ability to suffer in the same way and to the same degree that humans do. They feel pain, pleasure, fear, frustration, loneliness, and motherly love. Whenever we consider doing something that would interfere with their needs, we are morally obligated to take them into account”(singer 2). The significance of this passage is to explain that even though animals can not speak to us, and tell us that they are hurting, doesn’t mean we can continue to abuse them and conduct inhumane tests on them. This passage shows us that animals rights need to be taken into consideration before we derive them of their basic rights. Animals should be allowed rights, especially when they are being cruelly tested for things that don’t even benefit humans. The Royal Journal of Medicine clarifies this, “Most experiments on animals are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances, and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses”( the royal journal of medicine). Animal testing for useful information is a bad thing in itself; however, cruelly testing animals for just one's own curiosity is unacceptable. This information supports why animals need rights, so they don’t have to be put through such cruel
Animal Experimentation: The Moral Issue By Robert M.
830 Words | 4 PagesNumerous people have attempted to justify the use of such methods by putting down or rather, dismissing the animal as a creature lacking the mental capacities to be considered equals to that of a human being. In their book "Animal Experimentation : The Moral Issue" authors Robert M. Baird and Stuart E. Rosenbaum say, "holders of rights must have the capacity to comprehend rules of duty, governing all including themselves" (104). He then goes on to explain that "animals do not have such moral capacities" (Baird 105). And as a result of this "we can't violate their rights because they have none" (Baird 105). Dismissing the animal as nothing more then an object may not seem like the most reasonable defense against the use of animals for testing
Summary Of Alternative Testing Cannot Replace Animal Experimentation By George Poste
531 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing Rights The article “Alternative Testing Cannot Replace Animal Experimentation'' was written by the author George Poste. In this article Poste talks about how animal testing is a necessity and that there is no alternative to replace animal testing. Poste is credible to write this article because he is a veterinarian, the Professor of Health Innovation and the Chief Scientist at Arizona State University. He has published over 400 research papers and edited 14 different books on pharmaceutical technologies, cancer, along with other infectious diseases. He wrote this specific article to prove that animal testing actually is necessary.
Persuasive Speech Animal Testing
1084 Words | 5 PagesCredibility Step: Much of the information I’m going to share with you today came from the PETA website, the book The Animal Ethics Reader by Susan Armstrong and Richard Botzler, and the article “Animal testing: is it worth it?” by Geoff Watts. II. Body A. (1st main point) The problem of animal experiments has become one of the central ethical dilemmas in the modern society, and some countries have even banned the practice due to its cruelty 1.
Should Animals Learn American Sign Language Analysis
799 Words | 4 PagesAnimals need to have support, because after the testings done they die or look awful. Their skin is patchy or they can not see or hear anymore. Animals need to feel safe and that is where humans should advocate the rights for
Pros And Cons Of Animal Bill Of Rights For Animals
765 Words | 4 PagesAnimals should have the right to be free from unnecessary suffering and experimentation because they are innocent creatures. An argument for opposing the Animal Bill of Rights is that research will be slowed or stopped completely, resulting in the death of humans that could have been saved. The Animal Bill of Rights is not meant to stop or prevent experimentation on animals; it is meant to limit the extraneous suffering and torment animals go through in the name of development. Animals are innocent- it cannot defend itself against malevolent human intentions. The Animal Bill of Rights is meant to prevent the exploitation of animals and refute the justification that experimentation makes animal cruelty moral.
The Ethicality Of Animal Experimentation
1144 Words | 5 PagesMany of the concerns of the ethicality of animal experimentation is understood by the people who still believe animal testing is necessary. Many regulations are enforced on animal studies in an attempt to make them as moral as possible. Additionally, there are also campaigns that advocate the regulation on animal testing “ which advocates the search (1) for the replacement of animals with non-living models; (2) reduction in the use of animals; and (3) refinement of animal use practices “ (Hajar 7). They understand the upset at the idea of animal testing, and they want to appease the masses by keeping the testing as humane as it can possibly be. Even with all of the outcry, there is a large group of people that see animal experimentation as a necessary evil.
Inaccurate Animal Testing
400 Words | 2 PagesEvery day, thousands of animals are subjected to cruel, inhumane treatment. In the United States, there are many laws in place to prevent the mistreatment of animals, but one of the most harmful ways of abusing animals is not only legal, but considered by many to be completely justified. The process described is that of animal experimentation, the act of performing experiments on an animal that can deliberately cause the animal suffering and even death. Animal testing should be abolished because it is unnecessary, inaccurate, and cruel to animals. Firstly, animal testing is an inaccurate and outdated means of gathering information.
The Argument Against Animal Experiment
482 Words | 2 PagesThe researchers do not consider the animal’s capacity for suffering, and they already knew the experiment will cause the animals suffer. After the experiment, the animal suffers pain and the researchers will destroy the animals because they are only the sample in the research. The animal has a very little chance to live. The experiment is exploiting the right of an animal to live. The destroy of the animal sample is treat the animal as a tool, the animals become the substitutes to test for the human being interested, and the test is fatal.
Animal Testing Is Ethical
372 Words | 2 PagesAnimal testing has been a subject of controversy for many years and there have been some great discoveries because of it, however, has this practice been done ethically? For a cosmetic company to inject rabbit’s eyes of chemicals, thus causing it pain, is unethical and immoral. This practice negates the theory of Kant’s Practical Imperative, where animals are used for experiments, not only for life and death experiments, but for experiments that indicates whether a product has irritating side effects for humans, for example (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2015). The immorality of this practice is where scientists are subjecting pain and sometimes torture to animals for results to tests. It is immoral, as Kant suggests, to subject sentient beings to pain
Animal Testing Research Paper
1139 Words | 5 PagesAnimals in Research and Testing According to PETA, the animals who are in research and testing “shake and cower in fear whenever someone walks past their cages and their blood pressure spikes drastically. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed,” (“Animal Testing 101”). Animal-testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances, such as foods, beauty products, and/or drugs. Although animal research plays a crucial role in experiments focused on disease treatments and preventions, it is cruel, inhumane, and should be stopped. This is an act that should be banned and prohibited in all states and countries
Is Animal Testing Right Or Wrong Essay
442 Words | 2 PagesSadly, these animals are treated as nothing more than disposable lab equipment. It is both inhumane and unnecessary to end these animals' lives for the sake of unreliable experiments. There are many ways that animals are used by scientists in testing. The article Animal Research, Right or Wrong?, states that "scientists inject animals with experimental drugs to see how effectively they treat AIDS, cancer, and hundreds of other diseases. "The problem is that animals and humans differ biologically, so accurate results cannot be obtained.
Animal Testing Beneficial Essay
574 Words | 3 PagesAnimals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.
Why Animal Testing Should Not Be Banned
796 Words | 4 PagesActually all testing and research done on animals should be under the control of government. The last and the most things is that it’s our responsibilities to take care of all the animals, even though they are just using for
Should Animal Testing Be Banned
967 Words | 4 PagesThroughout moral, humanistic, and social perspectives animal testing is beneficial for medical evolution. Animals ' rights are of less moral worth than human rights. Humans are complex beings with large well developed brains, which form sizeable social groups, have significant ability to communicate with one another, and possess desires, preferences and interests about the world. Humans have an awareness of their own existence and mortality, and as such are beings worthy of moral consideration. According to Pycroft (2011), “Without access to live organisms we would know far less bout the function of the cardiovascular, how digestion works…
Animal Welfare Research Paper
1101 Words | 5 PagesAnimals may assist in the advancement in medicine by acting as test subjects, but this does not mean that we are given the right to neglect their basic needs. In laboratories, animals live stressful and unnatural lives, being locked in crowded cages and deprived of basic resources in order to ‘save resources’. While this may be cost-efficient to prevent using more resources, it also causes harm to animals when basic needs like space, food, and water are not given where needed. Animals are also put through painful procedures, of which most are rather questionable – including permanent infestation of worms in dogs for future studies. One example of this is the commonly used Lethal Dose 50 Percent test – a test that requires animals to be injected with high amounts of toxin to determine what dose will kill 50 percent of test animals.
More about Why Is Animal Testing Wrong
Animal Experimentation: The Moral Issue By Robert M.
830 Words | 4 PagesSummary Of Alternative Testing Cannot Replace Animal Experimentation By George Poste
531 Words | 3 PagesPersuasive Speech Animal Testing
1084 Words | 5 PagesShould Animals Learn American Sign Language Analysis
799 Words | 4 PagesPros And Cons Of Animal Bill Of Rights For Animals
765 Words | 4 PagesThe Ethicality Of Animal Experimentation
1144 Words | 5 PagesInaccurate Animal Testing
400 Words | 2 PagesThe Argument Against Animal Experiment
482 Words | 2 PagesAnimal Testing Is Ethical
372 Words | 2 PagesAnimal Testing Research Paper
1139 Words | 5 PagesIs Animal Testing Right Or Wrong Essay
442 Words | 2 PagesAnimal Testing Beneficial Essay
574 Words | 3 PagesWhy Animal Testing Should Not Be Banned
796 Words | 4 PagesShould Animal Testing Be Banned
967 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Welfare Research Paper
1101 Words | 5 Pages