The British Empire colonized many countries in the 19th and 20th century. One of their most exploitive captures was Australia. Before the 19th century, Britain sent many convicts and soldiers to Australia because of their overcrowded prisons, then settlers began living along the coast. Australia was their most credulous gain because it was deemed uninhabited, uninhabitable and there was current British soldiers and prisoners living there.
Firstly, Australia was declared a Terra Nullius in 1788. The term “Terra Nullius” is Latin for “nobody’s land.” This title means that this area was uncolonized, despite the approximate 750,000 Aboriginals already living . Because of this, Britain claimed and settled in Australia. When Lt James Cook was in Australia, he and his group came about the indigenous inhabitants, called Aboriginals, and considered it not their land because of how they lived. The Aboriginal culture and lifestyle was very different from the Europeans’. According
…show more content…
The Dutch had developed a strong trade system with the Aboriginals in the late 1600’s. The French had also sent many voyages there before Britain, but abandoned plans of a colony because of its unsuitable land. Even Spain planned to attack Sydney with boats equipped with a new kind of cannon, referred to as “hot shot.” According to The Telegraph, “The Spanish plan followed an expedition led by naval commander Alessandro Malaspina, who reported back to his government in the 1790s … that Britain planned to control the territory and use it for commercial ends and the discovery of resources.” Even though this plan was never followed through, historians believe that if Spain had seized the country, Britain would have quickly redeemed it because they had a stronger military and would have hesitated in giving up their commercial interest in controlling
History NSW syllabus for the Australian curriculum 10. Cambridge University Press,
Australian troops, also known as the ANZAC's, believed that if all of the ANZAC troops attacked Turkey, it would shorten World War 1 greatly. However, their plan of taking down Turkey had failed, they did not take into account all of the possible outcomes. They believed that if they could take down Turkey, the ANZAC soldiers main target would be threatened. Turkey was on the side of Germany, Austro-Hungary etc. Australia wanted to take down Turkey for a main purpose, threaten Austro-Hungary.
The Australian army was building and they were able to join forces with Britain to create a larger army. The prime minister, Joseph Cook, offered to Britain in
Before that, it was simply a collection of 6 British colonies. They partly self-governed but they were under the law-making power of the British Parliament. Many people had wanted Australia to maintain the British heritage which means only white people can be allowed into Australia, creating the ‘White Policy’. Because of this, non-Australians could not help in the war, no matter how much they wanted to.
Exploration shaped Australia because if sea explorers did not come to Australia. It would not be known today as it is. 3. What was life like for Aboriginal people before the arrival of the white faced people?
Australia had been arguing over the rules that the government is the U.S were making, soon after that they realised that Australia had the same rules in the government which were treating black people without respect or being polite to them. The white people thought they were better than the black people so they had them as slaves and bashed/killing. Australian finally realised that it was unfair that black people weren’t getting treated equally so a man named Charles Perkins changed the law of Australia and equalised the country completely. Charles Perkins is famous soccer player, he was an aboriginal but he to good to not have him on the teams. Charles Perkins had a group of university students that toured in NSW to stop Racial Equality and then later on it happened to the whole
During the time of the Industrial Revolution the British Empire (as well as the French and Spanish, to name a few) was expanding. People no longer felt confused by their locality, but rather were inclined to travel. As Source B shows the image of the ship, around 11 000 000 slaves who were housing convicts, were forcibly removed from their countries from around 1500 to the 1850’s. However, some people also wanted to move to have a better lifestyle for themselves and their children. This therefore colonised Australia because most of the convicts were transported to other countries including Australia, America, Canada and South Africa.
3. The gradual development of a new administrative and practical definition of ‘Aboriginality’. This definition was based on community and self-identification, not just a person’s DNA or
That infuriated the colonies and made them think of a way to gain their
Western colonisation has had a devastating affect on the Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander people. This is evident throughout the generations. Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander people struggle with contemporary impacts of western cultures, largely in the Northern Territory. These impacts brought in by predominately white societies, have literally poisoned the persons who chooses to indulge. Since western society, illnesses and the death rate has increased within Aboriginal communities.
The Aboriginals spoke their own language, had their own laws and customs, and mostly a strong connection with the country’s land. The British arrived to the shores and declared Australia ‘terra nullius’ meaning empty land that belongs to no body. The land clearly wasn’t uninhabited but the Indigenous people no longer had the right to use the land as they please freely. Under international law Australia was now British land. As a result, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders occupation of and unique connection with the land weren’t recognised and the British took the land without agreement or payment.
As the world grew more populated, to many Australians it seemed that Great Britain was both a physically long way and also very different to Australia. The Australia of pre World War II was now very different to the Australia colonised by the British so many years earlier. In 1919, Australia had, for the very first time, been considered a fully self-governing nation and was asked independently of Great Britain to be a part of the Treaty of Versailles (Carrodus, Delany and McArthur, 2012). Prior to this, Britain was responsible for all political agreements for Australia (Museum of Australian Democracy).
During the 1850s, an idea of uniting Australia as one and forming a federation slowly emerged into the society. Many different opinions came up and at first but the idea didn’t appeal to many leading for it to be abandoned and left untouched for years. The communication and transport between nations was put behind the interests of the people as each colony thought that their own interests were more important and should be placed first. In the 1880’s though, people starting to give some serious thought on the idea of combining the nations that made up of Australia at that time and thoughts such as an uniform law system started to break the surfaces. On January 1st 1901, Federation was finally achieved and Australia was truly united as one.
Australia is known as a country of freedom and fairness, however many groups such as youth, the unemployed, aged, and ethnic groups tend to become marginalised because of their minority status. Certain groups are marginalised because they are perceived as being different or undeserving of equality in society. This is called stereotyping and it leads to prejudice and discrimination. This essay explores three marginalised groups and discusses some of the reasons why they are marginalised and the effects on those within these groups. Exclusion from areas such as employment and other services and opportunities that other Australian 's take for granted, is a result of the marginality of indigenous Australian 's, woman, and those with
Both Australia and Nazi Germany used scientific racism to justify their racial policies. Where they differed was in the application of the genocide. While both methods were systematic, the end result was similar in that they both committed mass killings. Scientific racism is the pseudoscientific study of techniques and hypotheses developed in the early 20th century used to justify eugenics. This stemmed from Social Darwinism which was started by people who used Darwin’s theory of evolution to deduce that some races were superior to others.