For many, the question of whether Canada’s vast multiculturalism is beneficial or hindering remains unanswered and unresolved. From its adoption on October 7 1971, multiculturalism was intended to preserve the cultural freedom of all individuals and to provide recognition of the cultural contributions of diverse ethnic groups to Canadian society. Despite multiculturalism being one of Canada’s defining qualities, opinions upon the subject are difficult to form due the unawareness of Canadian citizens and global population. Although the welfare of this outlining characteristic is experienced day by day in the functioning of the country, little to no recognition are given to these advantages. By embracing the variety of cultures within Canada, …show more content…
Over a period of twenty-four years, a sizeable increase of immigrant workers (including that of skilled and educated workers, entrepreneurs, and investors) have been integrated within the provinces of Canada (see Appendix A). As multiculturalism is clearly found throughout modern Canadian government systems and within large businesses of Canada’s economy, the expansion of trades and exports have expanded rapidly. With the obstacle of a language barrier being broken and the preservation of an equal respect to all cultures, statistics showed that a 1% increase in immigration and cultural diversification lead …show more content…
Throughout the past of Canadian growth, there have been several issues pertaining to the acceptance and to the respect of minorities scattered among the nation. This includes the assimilation of Native Americans within schools, work places, and simply within their own living spaces. In 1931, 80 residential schools within Canada were fully functioning and whose soul purpose was to teach the young Aboriginal generations the “correct” manners in conforming to society (such as learning the French and English languages, adopting Christianity, and Canadian customs). If caught using their mother tongue, the students were severely punished. (For more information on residential schools see Appendix B). As the residential educational system remained in place until 1996, the respect for the Aboriginal culture plummeted to an all time low creating a strenuous journey to revive its nature. With the growth of multiculturalism, followed the growth of regard towards Native cultures and their diminishing traditions. Now in today’s Canadian society, “more than 1.4 million people (over 4 per cent of the total population in Canada) identify themselves as an Aboriginal person” (L. Aylsworth, F. Trovato, 2012, para 1) without the fear of assimilation and with the equal respect of every Canadian. Because of the acceptance of multiculturalism, Canadians are able to view one
Indigenous people across Canada have been suppressed by the government, system, and settlers still to this day. The residential school system was a system of boarding schools that were established by the Canadian government and administered by various churches to assimilate Indigenous children into Euro-Canadian culture. Many of these children suffered physical, sexual, and emotional abuse from school staff. Even though residential schools have been abolished they can still affect indigenous people today. The book “Indian Horse” clearly represents the intergenerational trauma of Indigenous communities in Canada.
This short essay will explain the main issue that is discussed in the article “Canada’s Immigration System Lacks Heart, Critics Say” by Debra Black. It will discuss the words, phrases and sentences that are used in the article that connects to questions
This paper will review the first five chapters in J.R. Miller’s book Shingwauk’s Vision: A History of Native Residential Schools. These chapters examine the events that took place before residential schools were made, as well as looking into the historical context of Canada during this time period. The first chapter of the book explains the way in which indigenous communities educated their children before contact by the European settlers. The educational systems from these indigenous communities were much different than the European educational systems, in the sense of a formal, rigid, institution.
Denis, 2011, p. 306-307). To further explain her thesis, she claims that multiculturalism is used by the government of Canada as a method of colonizing Aboriginal people and diverting the issue of recognition and retribution for the Aboriginal people (St. Denis, 2011). St. Denis proposed at a provincial social science curriculum discussion that Aboriginal studies should be considered a separate course in the Canadian curriculum as opposed to being combined with social studies and history (St. Denis, 2011). The suggestion that was made was interjected by the comment, “Aboriginal people are not the only people here” (St. Denis, 2011, p.306). Although the comment may hold truth, the author uses that remark to further provide evidence that multiculturalism is used as a form of colonialism (St. Denis,
Before the Indian Act most of the young members of the First Nations followed the traditions and beliefs of previous generations, however, this changed with the introduction of Residential schools through the Indian Act. By 1948, there were 78 schools operating with nearly 10,000 students enrolled. This education network was established by the government but was controlled by the Catholic, Anglican and Presbyterian churches. The objective of this school system was to teach young aboriginals how to integrate themselves into the “normal” Canadian life. In other words, this whole system was a major cultural genocide.
Canada is a nation known for the multicultural population. It is seen as an attractive destination for the great social policies adopted by the charismatic leaders the country was able to create. Since the 1800’s, Canada’s immigration laws were severely restricted to non-whites, nevertheless, the country has now evolved to encompass all ethnicities equally. Canada’s identity, especially since the 1950’s and onwards, experienced rapid growth and change. This can be seen through the following examples: Immigration, Pierre Trudeau and the F.L.Q crisis.
Significance of Constitution Act of 1982 Canada has earned the title of being a peacemaking nation which is well deserved and known in the international community. It supports equality among everyone, protects and guarantees the rights of its citizens, and is considered a role model for protection of human rights around the world. However in Canada’s history, it’s society was once filled with prejudice and there were many discriminatory laws. This was evident in many historical events such as the mistreatment of the First Nations people, and the unfair Chinese Immigration Acts. Those laws had a very negative significant impact on the people.
Over the course of a 40-year period in the 20th century, over 1 million immigrants came into Canada through Pier 21 in Halifax. In 2011, immigrants accounted for more than 20% of British Columbia’s population. The first Indian immigrants came to Canada in 1903; the majority of them were brought over as agricultural workers. 100 years later, Indo- Canadians represent 4% of the current population in Canada and Indian immigration to Canada is growing at an unprecedented rate. The changing political and social landscape of Canada, which helped to shape the immigration system, is responsible for the unequaled growth in Immigration to Canada.
In the 20th century it was apparent that huge changes occurred in the world. In Canada, there were many ups and downs that contributed to how the present was shaped. Both of the world wars were terrible, but fate had brought these battles to diminish the economically poor times. After the second World War, Canada’s identity was shaping into the one we see today. The war changed Canada in various aspects, such as how Canada was part of a cause to support other countries in need of help, how the economy was advancing, and Canada’s part in peacekeeping missions across the world.
Trudeau’s multiculturalism concept became the hallmark of his government’s domestic policy and, arguably, the one with the greatest lasting impact on Canadian society. Trudeau’s multiculturalism mentality for a Canadian citizenry was a radical departure from the two-founding nation myth mentality that previous Canadian Prime Ministers had reinforced as a policy, primarily as a means to placate Quebec. This concept, that immigrants could come to Canada and become Canadian citizens while keeping their cultural heritage and traditions, was a stark departure from the previous policies, emphasizing either French-Canadian or, to a greater extent, British-Canadian heritage. In addition, prior to Trudeau’s multiculturalism concept, the Canadian government emphasized that immigrants were to abandon their cultural heritage and traditions, in order to obtain full citizenship. This even applied to the French-English conflict.
Canada has a little piece of almost every culture in the world, shown through the large amount of people moving to Canada from every continent in the world. The multitude of cultures is displayed through the plethora of festivals held throughout the country every year, such as the Folk Fest, Edmonton Food Festival, Heritage Festival and the International Film Festival, all bringing in various cultures and traditions from around the world. Canada has all of these festivals due to the large amount of immigration that was even shown in Anita Rau Badami’s essay my Canada, when she and her husband had moved from India to Vancouver. Canada is one if not the most desirable countries to immigrate to, not only for the living conditions but because of the ability to keep your culture and not have to assimilate to a “Canadian” culture. Thanks to immigration Canada has become a great model country to look at for cultural diversity and cultural acceptance that any country can look at and try to model in their own
Imagine being ripped apart from family members, culture, tradition, and labelled a savage that needs to be educated. Imagine constantly facing punishment at school for being one’s self. Unfortunately, these events were faced head on for many First Nations people living in Canada in the late 20th century. These First Nations people were the victims of an extensive school system set up by the government to eradicate Aboriginal culture across Canada and to assimilate them into what was considered a mainstream society.
Over the past few decades, there has been many distinct perspectives and conflicts surrounding the historical context between the Indigenous peoples in Canada and the Canadian Government. In source one, the author P.J Anderson is trying to convey that the absolute goal of the Indian Residential School system in Canada has been to assimilate the Indian nation and provide them with guidance to “ forget their Indian habits”, and become educated of the “ arts of civilized life”, in order to help them integrate into society and “become one” with their “White brethren”. It is clearly evident throughout the source that the author is supportive of the Indian residential school system and strongly believes that the Indian residential School System
In Canada today although a very open and well-known nationality ‘Mixing pot’ there is still signs of racism in different aspects of the home, family, workplace, and religion. It can be seen in all of the said topics and how it affects those impacted by racism. The lesser attention is given by teachers to certain students and inter students relations, The home life of families within a certain neighbourhood or community as well as social groups and the judiciary system and how that concerns the punishments and crime in Canada. The reduction of payment in the workforce and some exclusion of certain racial groups in various religions. Working towards eliminating the racial differences and creating a more welcoming society and sense of togetherness in Canada.
A national policy of multiculturalism since the 70’s has resulted in obvious diversity,