Catcher in the Rye
There's a very large controversy over should catcher in the rye be banned or not and why so? Catcher in the rye was wrote by J.D. Salinger and he put many rude addresses in the book as well as some swearing but nothing too graphic or extreme. However there are many points in the book where he uses the lord's name in vain which I imagine would anger many religious members and parents because they don't want their children to accept that kind of language or behavior. Just one of the many times he uses this type of language for example when ackley says “stop calling me ackley kid god damn it.” (25) Honestly what would banning this book do, except keep us from learning about it in school? Very few teachers ever teach this book and if a parent doesn't want their child to read it they can just have a word with the teacher. The only thing it would if the book were banned is keep us from having to read and write about this book in class. You can still go to a public library or a bookstore and read it. This book is an extremely famous book, I’m not sure why but many people love this book. Catcher in the Rye has been bought and sold for over fifty years and if younger generations want to read this they should have the right to do so even if it is a somewhat
…show more content…
He kinda seems like he says those words so much because he doesn't know other ones or is too childish and those words scare him. For example near the end of the book on page 201 holden sees the f-word written on the wall and it makes him furious but he's almost to scared to wipe it off the wall because he thinks that someone would catch him wiping it off and think he wrote it. This event makes holden look immature and shows he doesn't like foul language when it passes a certain point do to his
In the film, Holden decides that an art piece is too explicit for his taste, so he takes it down. When he is questioned about his decision, his answer is “I’m Holden. What do you expect?”. The reason the actor said this statement with a nonchalant attitude is simply because Holden in The Catcher in the Rye, responds to everything with a nonchalant attitude. In The Catcher in the Rye, when Holden’s ex-teacher is giving him a life lesson, Holden’s response is “if you get on the side where all the hot-shots are, then it’s a game, alright- I’ll admit that.
It just makes no sense to take something that got recognized for how great it is and then not let anyone see it or read it. It’s a shame it really is that they will ban a book just because of one or two people's complaints. Some may say that it doesn't matter how good the book is but if the content is inappropriate then it should not be read, but they are wrong. Really the appropriateness of the content doesn't change the quality of the
However, in my opinion this book should not be banned. The biggest reason Of Mice and Men has been repeatedly banned and challenged is because of the impression that it’s promoting
“The state of kids publishing is such that it’s perfectly reasonable to be concerned about what agenda-driven and/or prurient content they’re peddling.” (Hemingway) This means it is very reasonable for everyone to be concerned about what the kids and young adults are reading. If parents are not concerned about what their child is reading, their child will follow many bad influences from books they have read. There are many influential books such as The Outsiders, by S.E Hinton that should be banned.
Many books have been placed on the banned book list, they have been placed on the list because concerned people fear that certain books have and leave an effect on the reader. America’s classic novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, has been placed on the banned book list ever since it was first published. To Kill A Mockingbird should absolutely remain on the banned book list because it shows racism throughout the entire book and teaches the reader that being prejudice is alright. As you read the novel To Kill A Mockingbird you notice that it is very racist. Throughout the novel you notice that it repeatedly uses the “n” word.
The book sheds a tear as it is banned by administration for students to read. The Catcher in the Rye should not be banned for summer reading for incoming sophomores because of its “explicit” content. After high school, out in the real world, life experiences are not censored or banned to protect you. You must experience life and all that comes with it.
Now, we aren’t as serious as they are in the book about reading and censorship, but now parents are complaining about books like Of Mice and Men, and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, because of the language that is used. People need to read these books, so that they learn the history, and it should make them uncomfortable because it was not a good time in history and they need to learn about how racist and terrible it was for some
This book should be taught to High School students across the country, and it should not be a banned book. To Kill a Mockingbird teaches students morals, and ethics. The book is still partially accurate to what some people go through even in today’s world, and what the books reads is still a part of history that should not be covered up and tucked away. To Kill a Mockingbird should still be taught in school systems, and should not be a banned book because the novel focuses on a part of history that should not be ignored.
The book should not be banned because it is a valuable tool for educating young people and promoting empathy and understanding.
This book should not be banned even though it portrays so many violent moments because it shows us the horrible reality of racial prejudice and discrimination. The Jews had to go through terrible things. For example, Elie “didn’t know that this was the moment in time
Hello, my name is Zac, and today I will be speaking to you all about why To Kill a Mockingbird should not be banned in schools. To Kill a Mockingbird is a novel written and published by Harper Lee in 1960. The novel takes place during the three years of the great depression in the fictional town of Maycomb, Alabama. The novel deals with serious issues of rape and racial inequality. To Kill a Mockingbird should not be banned in schools because students such as myself need to exposed to the themes that are in the novel because the novel’s themes have relevance in today’s society.
The realistic fiction novel, “Catcher in the Rye”, by J.D. Salinger demonstrates that separation can be a negative form of self-defense. When you refuse to face your feelings and omit yourself from parties and hanging out with friends, you’ll feel worse about yourself and how you’re feeling on the inside. The effects of separation will eventually show if you even deny that you are doing it and cause you to have a negative attitude. The narrator of the story is Holden Caulfield
To Ban Or Not To Ban? That Is The Question? “Although Of Mice and Men is a literary classic, it is also a frequently banned book in many schools and libraries in the United States. This book has been either banned or challenged for over twenty years from a variety of different schools and libraries.
Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with
I could puke every time I hear it” (9). Most people probably would not notice such a tiny aspect in the conversation, but this word is a red flag to Holden. Holden picks up that Mr. Spencer does not usually use this word, and he is only using it to impress him in this situation. His criticism of his acquaintances shows that he emits a persona that he is better than everyone else, and no one is immune to his criticism. By showing that no one is immune from Holden’s criticism, it reveals that Holden can be critical of himself as