Yes or no, I will show you my view of it. I do not think Common Core is necessary. However, I think that with Common Core we are able to increase our understanding of a specific topic. Unfortunately, Common Core teaches an unnecessary amount of methods and ways to do simple tasks. The fact is, Common Core is used to teach students to think deeper and explain more. STAR was “a mile wide and an inch deep”. Common Core is “a meter wide, and a kilometer deep”. According to Dr. Terrance Moore, Common Core confuses “education” with “job training”.(1) Common Core says that uniform standards increase test scores. In certain cases, such as Finland and Singapore, that is true. But in Portugal, Italy, Greece, and Russia, which all have uniform standards, rank lower that the United States of America.(1) I think that Common Core should be taken out of all the state standards. Of the people surveyed, 100% said that they did not like Common Core (See question 2 above). Common Core is used to expand a …show more content…
Common Core is used to give students a mass of high pressure tests and high stake tests. The tests creates an environment which sometimes makes kids want to cheat to get higher grades. 11 teachers and administrators were fired for a cheating scandal in Alabama.(1) Common Core limits parents and students control over the standards. Only 15 percent of the standards are able to be changed by the states. The other 85 percent cannot be changed in any way by the states, students, parents, and teachers.(1) Common Core use non-fiction texts and limit the amount of fiction texted used. Common Core math standards do not prepare students for STEM fields. They are behind in math and the recommended path does not include calculus, a senior class, till college.(1) Calculus is needed for all STEM fields. It also collects data on children’s
Additionally, the United States ranked twelfth in college completion rates, a drastic decline for the former global leader of college completion (Kraft, 2014, p. 5). Pennsylvania adopted the original Common Core Standards at first, but then switched to their own state-specific version. The Pennsylvania academic standards are very similar to the Common Core. As stated by Kraft (2014), the PA Common Core is about 90% of the original Common Core (p.2).
Many school districts and teachers have openly stated they do not agree with the Common Core standards and wish they did not have to implement them, but to get the funding the school needs they do. With curriculum changes currently happening all around the country, wherever the reader is have heard about the upcoming changes and have formed their own opinion on it. This is the closest anyone could get to the Colorado situation without actually being there. Common Core is such a controversial topic that many people think over reaches the federal governments grasp on education (CBS, 2014, para. 22). The states hold the power of education, which is why, up until now in history, there have been no national standards.
“A basic Common Core idea is that the standards are supposed to emphasize depth over breadth, ensure students really master concepts, and build on previous learning (“scaffolding” is the term some educators prefer) (Paulson).” In other words, content is not taught by the “mile wide and an inch deep” idiom that represents what has been employed in the past. Instead, students are given more time to learn content specific objectives which provide a more solid foundation for future
Sawchuk, S. (2012). Many Teachers Not Ready for the Common Core. Education Digest, 16-22. http://proxy.ashland.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=82981829&site=ehost-live Beginning this research I stumbled on this article which discusses the successful implementation of the Common Core Standards.
In 2009, governors and state commissioners alike came together to formulate the development and implementation of the Common Core State Standards. Through membership organizations such as the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) (http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/frequently-asked-questions/), they were able to create a system that represented a clear-cut caliber of expectations meant for students in kindergarten to grade 12. Over the past several years, new amendments have been added to keep up with the standard that 48 states have adopted into their school systems, although the adoption of the policy was voluntary (http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/frequently-asked-questions/). Despite majority of the states in the U.S. having decided on the policy already, there has been conflict amongst the parents of the children who are subject to the rigorous and exhausting amount of tests they must take to keep up with what is fixed into their school systems. The argument against test-taking is a controversy in itself as many believe
Common Core is the federal government’s largest attempt to establish nationwide educational standards for all students in all grade levels in the subjects of reading and math. Proponents of Common Core argue that the standards ensure that students are ready for college or career success upon high school graduation. The standards can also serve as a diagnostic tool to gauge the academic standing of individual students, schools and districts. Resources can be better allocated towards individuals and schools that may be underperforming. Progress can be measured by assessing the extent to which individuals and schools meet the standards.
It was discovered that in education there were certain areas that were universal and common among learning. The two main subjects of concern were English language arts and mathematics. Common core is the new curriculum implemented now in school systems to develop learning. Common Core Standards are a clear set of shared goals and expectations for the knowledge and skills students need in English language arts and mathematics at each grade level so they can be prepared to succeed in college, career, and life. Although, Common Core seems to be here to stay this article addresses concerns in reference to content, instruction, and assessment.
Nevertheless, schools are facing hard times and taking the loss right where it hurts, the pocketbook. Many states signed up for the new curriculum within only two months, which was not nearly long enough to make sure that the new learning standard was fit for them. By signing up, these states agreed to buy tests and upgrade their technology to administer the tests. All of this added up to thirty dollars per student, more than what half the states can afford. “Common Core Causes Collateral Damage” reveals, “Just last month, Maryland announced it would need $100 million to get schools up to speed to administer the tests”(McShane, 2).
Anybody can guess the right answer but a child must first know how to analyze then solve the problem. Common Core standards suggest that their is one way and one way only to get the answer. The answer they want that is. Even when it comes to English their is always a set of guidelines to follow. According to the former President of the Modern Language Association, Gerald Graff, thinks the English /Language Arts standards are "unnecessary and nonsensical."
Common Core has a set of standards, each student must follow. “..implementing the Common Core Standards in English Language Arts and math,
The broad themes of the math standards require learners to be able to problem solve, reason abstractly and qualitatively, construct arguments and critique the reasons of others while, the English Language Arts (ELA) require learners to analyze (how, why), read, integrate and evaluate (literally and figuratively), question and critique. These skills require students to exercise higher order thinking through guidance instead of being told- traditional teaching methods (Conley, 2011). These standards were not mandated by the federal government but by state; as a result, a state can chose whether or not to have the standards govern their education system (Karge & Moore,
Common Core is forcing teachers to teach students Core standards, but these standards aren’t what future grades want/need. In Common Core isn’t preparing students very well for college or career, new report says, the author
Common Core’s standards are created with basic skills in mind, and according to David Scott Clegg “Students today…require a healthy balance of intellectual development -the acquisition of basic skills and knowledge…with the development of social-emotional intelligence” (Clegg). Common Core is not providing this “healthy balance” that Clegg discusses; Common Core is instead promoting a non-individual ideology which is against the first amendment of this nation. Under Common Core a student can be deemed “slow” from a failure of a standardized program, when in reality the child may be a gifted musician and is being told that they are not intelligent enough. This student will then have to give up their love of an activity in order to take special classes which may only worsen the student inability to test well, due to the lack of a creative outlet. Common Core also requires computer usage for many parts of the program.
School’s are using standardized testing for the wrong reason. “A standardized test is any examination that’s administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner. There are two major kinds of standardized tests: aptitude tests and achievement tests” (Popham, 1999). The most common examples of aptitude tests are the SAT and the
Recently, the Common Core State Standards were developed and kids were going to be tested more than ever. However, all of this education reform has been a failure because our testing scores have not improved, the testing makes children suffer, and it doesn’t improve how teachers teach. Education reforms has had little effect on our testing scores. The average score for a 17 year old student doing a reading test in the beginning of school is 285 and over 40