One of the most influential leaders of the 20th century once said "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.” Obviously Winston Churchill was not wrong at all. When we consider the other forms of government such as: communism, monarchy, dictatorship, and compare them with democracy. Democracy will be definitely one of the best form of government. On the other hand some of the most powerful countries such as: China or Russia believe that authoritarian regimes or different forms of democracy are better for their economic growth. This leads me to the question:"Is democracy the only option for governing"?
My grandparents believe that socialism is better than democracy.
…show more content…
In democratic state we can choose the government, but there is no other reason why people could not be as free under a dictatorship as in a democracy. In addition it is important to set up dictatorship or socialism in economically underdeveloped countries, which are not ready for the democracy. Otherwise these countries will not grow and prosper. Those two forms of the government help to achieve social stability and do not create economic inequality. We also need to change the form of democracy in Europe and create something between democracy and socialism. Name of this government would be ‘’Socio-Democracy’’. In ‘’Socio-Democracy’ ' everything must be ruled by a strong leader, who care about the middle class and is willing to pick a fight with the enemy. This leader speaks for the entire country, but people if are not satisfied they can vote for a new leader. Everyone is required to work and if someone is unemployed government will assign them a job. It would be great if we could copy the Russia 's form of socio-democracy. Hopefully we will present socio democracy better forms of government soon, but until that day comes I have to admit that the democracy is not the best form of government, but it is the best we
People will be able to vote freely and focus on those who are the most widely known citizens. Therefore it seems as though a republic is more capable of controlling the effects of
However, that may not be entirely the case, as Paul Cartledge explains, “There is no one 'democracy ' but rather a multiplicity of them”. Cartledge is correct in this explanation, due to the fact that Democracy has changed tremendously within the U.S.. Democracy began with the idea of civilian government, and within Thomas Jefferson
According to writer, James Mott’s Is the United States a Democracy?, “In the strictest sense of the word, the system of government established by the Constitution was never intended to be a "democracy” This is evident not only in the wording of the Pledge of Allegiance but in the Constitution itself which declares that "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government" Moreover, the scheme of representation and the various mechanisms for selecting representatives established by the Constitution were clearly intended to produce a republic, not a
This type of democracy, where the people, no elected officials, decide on the laws and policies was not a good plan for the country. Although
The people have the right to choose their leaders through election , whom they want to rule their government. Since the ruling leaders are selected by people through election, leaders feel an obligation & social responsibility towards their citizens . Due to the fact that elected leaders are bound to face an election after a certain tenure period, democracy prevents monopoly of ruling leaders. Leaders will do their best for the people, if not, they may not remain in power after their tenure ends. On the other hand , in absolute monarchy , the government system is led by a single monarch who generally rules the country until death and are not chosen or elected by the people of the country.
When you look at the literal definition of democracy in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, there is a decently large explanation. When looking at this definition and trying to decide whether the Athenian democratic system was truly democratic, one would have to go with the answer no. While it has been stated that Athens is the “cradle of democracy”, and that it was better than any of the other governments in the world, it was still a work in progress. The Athenian democracy, while it did give more power to the people, still left a lot of citizens out. The current American democracy may have steamed from Athens, but they do not really have that much in common.
Even our founding fathers didn 't want a democracy, because they thought it would cause disarray and issues. The United States of America is not truly a democracy for those
In Democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville, it talks about democracy in America and its strengths and weaknesses. Having seen the failed attempts at democratic government in his home country of France, Tocqueville wanted to study a stable and prosperous democracy to gain insights into how it worked. His studies led him to conclude that the movement toward democracy and equality of conditions was a universal phenomenon and a permanent historical tendency that could not be stopped. Since this democratic trend was inevitable, Tocqueville wanted to analyze it in order to determine its strengths and dangers so that governments could be formed to reinforce democracy 's strengths while counteracting its weaknesses. Even though Democracy in America
Both forms of government tend to use a representational system — i.e., citizens vote to elect politicians to represent their interests and form the government. In a republic, a constitution or charter of rights protects certain inalienable rights that cannot be taken away by the government, even if it has been elected by a majority of voters. In a democracy the majority is not restrained in this way and can impose its will on the minority. Most modern nations are democratic republics with a constitution, which can be amended by a popularly elected government. This comparison therefore contrasts the form of government in most countries today with a theoretical construct of a democracy, mainly to highlight the features of a republic.
3. Compare and contrast the idea of democracy in Ancient Greece and Rome. Which system was more democratic and why? Democracy is the modern day standard for governmental systems. However up until 500 BCE, the concept of Democracy was a foreign concept, and the great civilizations of that era were run by monarchs, aristocrats, and religious leaders of sorts.
The concept of leadership was prevalent in the ancient world. It had a place in the way the people of ancient times governed their lives. Greece, and especially Athens, is the cradle of democracy in the western civilization. Athens owes the first penal and civil law code to Draco. An outstanding statesman and poet called Solon acted in Athens at the same time as Draco.
When there are fixed and elected representative a more responsible government is formed. People under this type of system can discuss matters and problems thoroughly to come up with sensible decision. Weakness as democracy:
Democracy- the best form of governance; is evidently disputed in modern day politics. The disagreement has been carried on for centuries, as seen in Plato 's Republic and Pericles Speeches. According to The Republic, democracy cannot be implemented as the common man lacks the in-depth knowledge of vital spheres of bureaucracy such as economics, military stratagem, international conditions, and the niceties of law. However, this form of governance is viewed in a much more favorable light by Pericles in Thucydides ' History of the Peloponnesian Wars. He believes democracy is all beneficial to every sector of society and should be run for the general well-being, serving the ultimate goal of equality in justice.
Table of contents: 1. Cover page: Page 1 2. Table of contents: Page 2 3. Introduction: Page 3 4. Body: Page 4 5.
In an ideal democracy, voters will vote for the politicians and policies that can bring the most benefit to themselves, while the rules of the society cares about how to maximize the social welfare as a whole. However, in reality, people find