A prosecutor plays an important role in the courtroom. A prosecutor is a lawyer that represents criminals who has violated a criminal law and people against a person. A prosecutor 's role is to also represent the state or federal government. The prosecutor has more control in their role in the courtroom from the first appearance of the accuser up until the accuser get acquitted or sentenced. The criminal justice rely solely on the prosecutor 's to have the power and authority to negotiate a plea bargain deal with defendants.
Philosophical assumptions are often referred to as background or domain assumption (Bohm and Vogel, 2011). These theories are constructed of three types of philosophical assumptions. The first philosophical assumptions are the ethical assumption. It defines what is good and bad, right or wrong for an individual (Bohm and Vogel, 2011). The nature and obligations of an ethical assumption are to attack crime by using existing social institutions (Bohm and Vogel, 2011).
According to the story, the human understanding of justice is that it revolves around the actions assumed by the law rather than the actual outcomes. The idea of justice constructed upon the process accepted is based on the simple fact that it ensures that all the pertinent issues are addressed. Additionally, if the process is not followed correctly, it’ll become too complex to explain to the accuser how an action done good to them will now make up for an action done wrong to them before. This idea should be applied in today’s culture because the public is accountable for serving justice and it is obligated to follow the correct process in doing so appropriately.
Utilitarianism is the act committed, ways to prevent new crimes, and how to stop from repeating the crime. Last virtue ethics is character of the person, it is to achieve civil peace through moral virtues, and it helps rehabilitate or reform the offender. If Nifong believed that the defendants were in fact guilty then he could use the evidence he had against them. He had enough to support the beliefs that he had; therefore, if he believed them to be guilty, he could have gathered enough evidence to support that belief rather than hide the proof favorable to the defendants. I do not see the moral permissibility to bring charges to FedEx.
The Juries protect people’s rights and liberties through the teamwork with a judge. By working together in great effort they come down to one reasonable idea. Responsibility for justice mostly lies upon honesty and fairness of juries therefore people must rely on jurors for their own protection. Furthermore, a movie ‘’Twelve Angry Men” is great example of juror’s absolute honesty and sense of fairness in order to determine defendant committed a crime or not. The juries justify a defendant because of well clarified facts and the evidence of a murder that they find out by hard team working and their serious attitude toward a
Ethical dilemmas in policing is a serious concern. It is important for officers of the law to have ethics and morals in order to not be corrupt and then become bias against others. Ethics helps officers know when to use force against citizens and how much is appropriate. As long as people have power and authority over others, they will always be faced with ethical dilemmas.
One such argument can find its’ basis in the fact that the attorney-client privilege has the potential to protect guilty men and women. An example can be found in the Buried Bodies Case, when Robert Garrows confessed the murders to Frank Armani and the information was kept confidential. Thus, protecting Garrows, a guilty man, from any punishment at the time. Many would also argue that even if the crime is not privately confessed between the client and their attorney, it hides reliable evidence that could otherwise be used to convict the unjust. Another strong argument that can be used is the fact that, in court, you must be truthful.
”$. Someone might argue that the prosecutor is doing nothing more than his/her job and that they are following the guidelines laid out for him/her by the government. While part of that is true, an individual’s implicit biases could cause them to exercise their discretion in a way that is unjust and cruel. That is why law-makers must also step up and propose legislation that
Lawyers would have to specialize to a much greater degree to be able to maintain their current case load. Lawyers could also generalize their practice based on Courtroom Work Groups and Prosecutors taking specific cases. (How the Prosecutor Decides Which Cases to Charge. Retrieved from https://www.nolo.com).
I believe this will be an ethical dilemma to deal. When my desire as the worker is to help the client work to the best of his/her interest and the need to respect his right to act in a way that the client feels best for him, may interfere with my job. Also, I consider confidentiality
Serving the public is the main duty of serving in this profession not only in a negative light by punishing those with the law but, also upholding justice, security, and protection to society. While providing these needs we must always address them without bias or discrimination because we live in a
Defense attorneys have an obligation as an officer of the court to follow the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, they are also bound by attorney-client privilege. These two roles can produce ethical conflicts between their profession and
The role of a solicitor, apart from providing legal advice, is to behave as a professional; with an ethical and disciplinary conduct. They are obliged to acquire a moral attitude, for a good example of the society. As Professor Rodell identified, it is the lawyers who run our civilisation for us. Achieving this, they ought to obey the SRA Code of Conduct 2011, which including principles and indicated behaviours. This essay will analyse a problem scenario which regards to a solicitor’s omissions, lacking to follow specific principles of the code.
The theory of right and wrong characteristics or good and bad behaviors is concerned with morality; its role can shape an individual’s personality which can affect his or her call of action. It is only natural that we should have some kind of sense of duty and physical forces from our experiences that make us have moral laws. It’s an aspect of humanity which helps them make rational decisions and it also serves as guidance for mere goodness. Our existence defines who we are as an individual because of our values that help us see past our wrongdoing and helps improve our future. This can be seen in Sophocles’ story of “Antigone,” Antigone’s character portrays a strong individual who is loyal and values her family more than the society.