IS EUROPEAN UNION AN EFFECTIVE FOREIGN POLICY ACTOR? : LISBON TREATY AND AFTER.
The European Union remains a relatively recent player at the global level. It is a politico-economic union consisting of twenty eight sovereign member countries. European Union has helped to promote peace, stability and economic prosperity throughout the European continent. The European Union has been built through a series of binding treaties and all the member states of the European Union have continuously tried to adopt common policies on an increasing number of social, economic and political issues. The Union is the latest stage in the process of integration that began after the world war two by the six founding western European countries, in order to foster
…show more content…
Well, there are however a number of factors that make European Union an influential power at global level. Some of these include, EU member states share a customs union; also share a single market in which goods, capital and people move freely; they share a common trade policy, a common agricultural policy. Nineteen European member states share a common currency, the Euro. The details of the above mentioned factors are provided below. Economically, the EU has established a single market throughout its territory; nineteen member states have joined the monetary union known as the Eurozone, thereby using a common currency, the Euro. In terms of EU’s economic strength, it could be said that in 2012, EU had a combined GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of 16.703 trillion international dollars, a twenty percent share of the global gross domestic product (in terms of purchasing power parity) or in other words, 20% of the world’s …show more content…
He specifically mentioned “Without hard capabilities to back up its diplomacy, Europe will lack its credibility and influence”. Twenty one out of 28 member states of EU are members of NATO. According to the NATO chief, EU lacks in transport planes, air-to-air refueling and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance assets and without these European Union won’t be able to strengthen its European Defence and Security Policy which in turn would affect its foreign policy
At the end of World War II, Western European powers sought political stability after a period of turmoil and devastation. Germany was divided into two spheres of influence: East Germany, controlled by the Soviet Union, and West Germany, controlled by the Allies. Western Europe attempted to unify in the post-war economy, and various views arose regarding this potential unity. The unification of Western Europe was met with opinions that were largely motivated by a nation’s own economic and political interests.
At the end of the Second World War, the European economy was devastated and the continent was in despair, and there was no political or economic stability in the region. Secretary Marshall believed that a politically stable and an economically strong Europe could serve the best interests of the United States. In June of 1947, Marshall revealed his mega plan for his European economic recovery program, also known as the “Marshall Plan”, which would, modernize industry, boost trade and make Europe prosperous continent again. The plan was a big success that laid the framework for a rebuilding of war ruined Europe and the formation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Marshall was not only dedicated to building a strong defense to safeguard the freedom and security of our nation, but also determined to find peaceful solutions to world conflicts.
There is a great deal of risk in the strategy spoken by President Reagan because of the imbalance between ends, ways and means. Lykke provides a conceptual framework and vocabulary for describing risk in strategy in his “three-legged stool” model. His main point is that a balanced strategy is solid, but if ends, ways, or means are not aligned, the strategy incurs risk (Reading C203 D, p. 4). In the spoken strategy there is especially an imbalance between the ends, ways and means to the desired end of a unified and free Europe. The ways in the strategy is only directed towards the city of Berlin.
In the mid-eighteenth century, many European powers wanted to expand their influence to other parts of Europe and to the rest of the world and also to gain new territories. To accomplish this, they had to overcome many issues. They had to make alliances with the natives of the new land, cooperate in trade with other powers, overcome diplomatic negotiation, and lastly make peace agreements. The natives of the new land would play a key role in establishing European powers.
Introduction In his Farewell Address, delivered on September 19, 1796, Washington articulates a position of non-entanglement in foreign affairs. “It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world” (Washington) As the young nation recovered from its war of independence and worked to secure its own internal cohesion, Washington did not believe that the states could withstand another war, which foreign entanglements would necessarily provoke, given events in Europe in the 1790s, most notably, the French Revolution and its related foreign wars.
Former U.S Secretary of Defense Robert Gates spoke to University of Colorado Boulder students this past Tuesday as the first speaker of the Leo Hill Distinguished Leadership Speakers series. Gates is best known for his position as Secretary of Defense from 2006-2011, where he served for eight different presidents including serving under President Obama 's term. He has received many awards including the governments highest civilian award, and The Presidential Medal of Freedom, awarded by President Obama himself. Gates history includes the following positions which include: President of Texas A&M, Director of CIA, Assistant Presidents to White House, second lieutenant in the U.S. Air Force, President of the National Eagle Scout Association,
Although he is a supporter of staying neutral in foreign affairs, he does believe in the idea of good faith and justice towards all nations. “Taking care always to keep ourselves by suitable establishments on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.” (Agel 1997) He states that these connections will only dilute the government’s judgment in its foreign policy. These relationships will draw the U.S into wars that have nothing to do with the safety and prosperity of America.
Did the EU’s goal of shared peace between lots of different cultures and people work out? The European Union, also known as the EU is a supranational organization that consists of 28 different countries. The EU was made to bring together countries that were torn apart by the war and to create peace between those countries. The EU works toward shared goals and issues yet remain separate countries all the same. The benefits of being a member in the European Union does not outweigh the costs due to loss of sovereignty, social unrest and peace, economic issues, and cultural identity with the diversity of languages and cultures.
Absolutism is defined as political power that concentrated to one person or a group and opposing or shared power doesn’t exist and reigning over the country. It’s opposite of constitutional government, therefore it lacks constitution and parliamentary system and political responsibilities doesn’t exist. In my opinion, absolute ruler should have a strong military power, have a wisdom and knowledge, and enlighten his/her country. The best monarch that fits to all these condition is Frederick the Great, who was King of Prussia. First reason is Frederick the Great had a great military power.
He thinks the United States shouldn’t be in other nations, and they shouldn’t be fighting battles with other nations. He prefers peace and
(par. 37) The president was referring to groups such as NATO that would stay together so that evil powers could not invade or tear down other countries. President Eisenhower thought that together the world is much stronger that if each country works by themselves. During the 1950's the United States put an importance on things like marriage and having children.
The African Union has succeeded in developing cooperation and unity inside Africa as a whole, taking into consideration its efforts towards reducing conflict and improving democracy. The African continent is working towards not only in peace as well as security, but is also blooming in areas such as culture; education; trade both in and out the African continent and continuing to place importance on the growth and empowerment of women. It is dedicated to giving strength to people centred within the Union through active communication of the programmes of the African Union, the branding of the Union and engagement of Member States and other stakeholders in defining and performing the African agenda. The African Union works hand in hand with leaders and diplomatic heads from the United States of America, European Union. It gets aid from other countries around the world to deliver on its promises of peace and health for all African citizens which so far has been
Member of the EU, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, G8 and the United Nations Security
Together with the Community itself (the 'primary column '), the CFSP and JHA constitute the second and third of the 'three mainstays ' of the EU. The EU is said to stand like a sanctuary on three columns: the Community; the Common Foreign and Security Policy; and co-operation in the field of Justice and Home Affairs (recast in the 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam as Police and Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters). These columns are of unequal quality. The Community (basically the supranational organizations and
Brian C. Schmidt’s (2002) chapter, “The History an Historiography of International Relations”, covers detailed aspects of the field of International Relations regarding its history and problems it has faced over its evolution. This essay will argue that Schmidt is able to effectively identify and address difficult issues posed in the International Relations field of work. This essay begins with a brief summary of Schmidt’s work and ideas. Next, the essay will discuss Schmidt’s views on the specific evolutionary issues of lack of coherency and identity behind the history of International Relations. Leading on from here, the essay will display Schmidt’s ideas on presentism and its impact on International Relations.