ipl-logo

Why Is Human Nature Inherently Good

995 Words4 Pages

“Human nature is neither demonic nor angelic”, a statement made by Mark Passio is an expression which I do not quite agree, because to me, it seems that man is inherently good. Generally, there are 3 schools of thoughts with regards to the nature of men. These include human nature is inherently good; human nature is inherently evil; and human nature is neither inherently good nor evil. Humanity is justified by how we perceived the world. With the recent happening in Penang, Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng has ordered that all stray dogs shall be put to sleep so that the people will not contract the rabies virus if they were to be bitten by the strays. However, many people including the non-governmental organisations formed by animal lovers had opposed this action. Some people deemed him as being cruel, while some see his action justifiable. Although his order may seem inhumane, but his intention was good. He wanted greater good for his people and thus he had no other way but to contain the spread of this virus by culling the strays. Hence, I believed that man is inherently good. This is supported by Plato and Aristotle that considered man as a rational animal. Jean-Jacques Rousseau agreed with Aristotle that men are able to distinguish what is right and what is wrong. Rousseau believed that what differentiate men from animals is our capacity for moral choices. …show more content…

Every man has their own way of thinking. Machiavelli presumed that men are bad and changeless. This is evident by one incident in China whereby a victim named Wang Yue was knocked down twice, lying in her pool of blood but no one came to her aid. This caused an uproar towards the whole Chinese nation because the world was shocked

Show More
Related

  • What Is The Lottery By Shirley Jackson Used To Illustrate The Truth About Human Nature

    1025 Words  | 5 Pages

    Over the centuries, the most challenging question to find an answer for; is about the human nature. Are people born with evil nature or good nature? However, until today, no person can find the truth about humanity. In fact, almost all people defend about the goodness in their souls and believe that they are far away from wickedness, although wars, murder and violence show strong evidence of evil in humans. In contrast, Shirley Jackson in her short story argues that evil is firmly rooted in human beings.

    Read More

  • Lord Of The Flies Extrinsic Analysis

    534 Words  | 3 Pages

    I believe good is intrinsic, while evil is extrinsic. Intrinsic means essential. Extrinsic means not part of the essential nature of someone or something. Everyone is born with a friendly soul but they have the ability to learn to become evil. Some people in life may seem along the lines of evil since they were born.

    Read More

  • Lord Of The Flies Inherently Wrong

    867 Words  | 4 Pages

    Some people might say that humans are inherently good but that is untrue. Humans are selfish and greedy, and they do not always do the right thing. Young boys who are not punished for doing bad things will become narcissistic and stop thinking about others. In essence, it is clear that all humans have the capacity for evil and, if put into the right situation, will act on their own needs and do anything for their

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Pizan And Machiavelli The Prince

    1056 Words  | 5 Pages

    Then for Machiavelli he talks about how a prince should show no fear instead for him to show that he is the one with power. That a prince's people should fear him. Both authors go on to talk on how their people react based on the prince and princesse act. The authors then go on to explain how they should view and run their people. Both authors also reflect the fact that the way their people are going to act towards them is mainly based off of how they treat them.

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson And Niccolo Machiavelli's The Morals Of The Prince

    762 Words  | 4 Pages

    Machiavelli argues the perfect prince will be both feared and loved by his people, and if unable to be both he will make himself feared and not hated. Machiavelli believes it is much safer to be feared than to be loved because people are less likely to offend and stand up against strong characters, also people are less concerned in offending a prince who has made himself loved. Accordingly, Machiavelli believes generosity is harmful to your reputation and the choice between being generous or stingy, merciful or cruel, honest or deceitful, should only be important if it aids the prince in political power. All in all, Machiavelli believes the ruler must be a great deceiver and do what is essential to uphold power over the

    Read More

  • Qualities Of A Good Man In Machiavelli's The Prince

    1284 Words  | 6 Pages

    In Machiavelli’s book, The Prince, he maintains a harsh perspective on reality. His advice on how to maintain power leaves no room for compassion or generousity. While some may believe that these are qualities of a good person, Machiavelli believes these qualities lead to the downfall of rulers. He acknowledges that, in reality, it is impossible for someone to have qualities of a good person and simultaneously a good ruler. Machiavelli’s realistic outlook causes him to emphasize that it is better to maintain power through fear, rather than compassion.

    Read More

  • Human Nature Inherently Evil Analysis

    155 Words  | 1 Pages

    Human nature I believe is evil. This might sound a bit harsh in some ways but subsequently, Humans are definitely prone to do bad things. This feeling was also experienced by some philosophers that we have studied this year, Philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature is inherently tainted. He believed that people will act immorally based on the extent on their corrupted nature if left without order. This might explain why anarchy leads to higher amount of crime and bad deeds, because there is no controlling leader.

    Read More

  • Age Of Absolutism Dbq Essay

    930 Words  | 4 Pages

    Machiavelli wrote about a fictitious prince, describing how he is a terrible being who has no respect for people who have a lower status than him. He is described as being selfish and untrustworthy. His writing about this prince was supposed to replicate princes and kings that were ruling and open he reader’s eyes to real issues occuring. In Document 1 there is an excerpt from The Prince, written by Machiavelli, telling about how terrible the Prince of England. Document 1 states, “For all men in general this observation may be made: they are ungrateful, fickle, and deceitful, eager to avoid dangers, and avid for gain, and while you are useful to them they are all with you, but when it [danger] approaches they turn on you”.

    Read More

  • Are People Born Inherently Good Or Evil

    812 Words  | 4 Pages

    This question has been asked for hundreds of years, are humans born inherently good or bad? Some might argue that as people mature, society’s influences ultimately determine whether or not that person will end up being good or bad. These people suggest that humans are naturally born of good intent. Many studies show that this may be true. In another case it can be argued that some people are born with a natural instinct to do bad things.

    Read More

  • Erasmus Vs Machiavelli

    1034 Words  | 5 Pages

    Machiavelli believed that men will follow a ruler as long as the ruler serves their interests, and a quick to turn against the ruler unless they fear great punishment. Machiavelli would say that it is best to be feared rather than loved as long as the fear does not cause hate, which he believed to be perfectly possible.

    Read More

  • Differences Between Mencius And Hsun Tzu

    797 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Man’s Nature Is Good and Man’s Nature Is Evil, Mencius and Hsun Tzu argue about the true meaning of human nature. Mencius believed that humans are inherently good and Hsun Tzu believed that humans are naturally evil. Is it possible humans can be both good and evil? When it comes to whether human nature is good or evil, most people will choose one or the other.

    Read More

  • Plato Vs Machiavelli

    429 Words  | 2 Pages

    He believes anyone can rule a polis if they have virtu. Once a ruler, a simple rule to follow to maintain power and not to be hated by the people, is to “not take away a man’s possession or woman”, Machiavelli believes the people will not feel threaten by following this rule, thus maintaining a stable polis. He expresses how “human nature never changes”, and that people are self-interested and they can turn against you once you are not profiting them. A good ruler must have the strength to do whatever it takes to obtain and maintain power, which essentially means that even if they have to hurt some of the people for the benefit of the popular mass, then they shall do so for the greater cause. Both Plato and Machiavelli believe that there must be a government in order for human kind to survive.

    Read More

  • Are People Born Good Or Evil Essay

    937 Words  | 4 Pages

    The understanding that some people are good or bad widespread all over the world.” The evil comes from human history and continue until today” and even today this statement has existed. Moreover, when people want to explain why people do some evil acts, the discussion often end with words like “people initially are born evil”. However, some other people argued that people are born good. Because of these many critics has debates such as: are people born bad, good or just like naked board without any morality.

    Read More

  • Principality In The Prince

    1652 Words  | 7 Pages

    According to him, rulers should know their respective limits when it comes to the force and violence they inflict. Machiavelli believes that maximizing betrayal, deception and other cruel acts aren’t considered talents. Although these methods are effective in gaining empire, these don’t help in getting glory. Therefore, using violence and cruelty may be necessary but should have limits. The prince must know up to what extent his violence should be inflicted upon and he must do it all at once to avoid the hatred and resentment from his

    Read More

  • Is Human Nature Inherently Good

    1075 Words  | 5 Pages

    Hence, I believed that men are fundamentally good. This is supported by Plato and Aristotle that considered men are good because they are born rational. Jean-Jacques Rousseau agreed with Aristotle that men are able to distinguish what is right and what is wrong. Rousseau believed that what differentiates men

    Read More

More about Why Is Human Nature Inherently Good

Open Document