ipl-logo

Why Is Human Testing Wrong

436 Words2 Pages

Human experimentation is not okay! Human experimentation is not okay, because if that person 's experiment goes wrong they are dead and never coming back to life. So many things could go wrong in that situation. The person could die or something else bad, ruining that person 's whole life both physically and emotionally. In my opinion, no human should be tortured just for a science experiment.

So many times in the past human science experiments have gone wrong. During World War II, the Nazis would do science experiments on their prisoners, sometimes torturing them for fun. Also to test things they would do during the war. The stuff scientist have put into humans are not good for the body and does very bad things to you. When doing the

Show More
Related

  • Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment

    1007 Words  | 5 Pages

    There are too many contraventions to the code of ethics that are set up for present day experimentation. As mentioned earlier, upon reading this story, I was completely disgusted. I was specifically outraged at the man who conducted this experiment; How could he do this to those innocent people? How could he let this happen? So, I did some additional research, because this story had literally upset me to the point of tears.

    Read More

  • Was Henrietta Lacks Be Allowed

    656 Words  | 3 Pages

    Is it right for one's life to be manipulated for the use of scientific research or is it just a evasion on the person's privacy. Henrietta Lacks was a African American with cells that intrigued many people, she was diagnosed with cancer leaving her to be cared for at her local hospital, where she would later die due to the extremity of the illness. While at the hospital she was unaware that the doctors there were experimenting on her taking cell samples from her body, to help find a resolution to multiple diseases. The people who examined Henrietta manipulated her and the rest of her family to gain information on her cellular structure to be ahead of others looking to achieve the same objective. Henrietta Lacks cells should have never been evaluated because it's an evasion of her freedom, a danger to her personal health, and cause conflicts.

    Read More

  • Outlook At Chapter 14 In Bad Blood Tuskegee

    1003 Words  | 5 Pages

    There are now laws that require every study to be examined and approved by committees before any experiment involve humans is

    Read More

  • Unethical Human Experimentation

    886 Words  | 4 Pages

    Human experimentation can be extensively characterized as anything done to a person to figure out how it will influence him. Its principle target is the procurement of new exploratory information instead of treatment. In the event that a trial is at last advantageous to others or even to the subject himself, this doesn't imply that treatment filled a critical need. Humans have long been used as subjects for a variety of experiments.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Bad

    725 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over 100 million animals are used as test subjects in the world, with approximately 26 million of them in the United States. Sadly, a majority of the time the products that are being tested on animals are not even effective once human trials begin. Consumers might object that if the products were tested to be safe on animals then they would be safe for humans. Yet, 92% of the times the products actually work in animal trials they are later deemed too dangerous or uneffective for people. Which means that most of the animals used in scientific testing are being abused for no apparent reason.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lack

    1835 Words  | 8 Pages

    There are over 100 million animals harmed in US research labs every year. Ninety- two percent of the tests conducted on animals do not actually work when used on people (animal testing). Why use animals at all when researchers can just use humans...incarsaterated humans. In the book “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” researchers used HeLa cells on men in prison to test the effects of the cells in the human body. Chester Southam put an ad in the Ohio State Penitentiary newsletter for twenty-five volunteers for HeLa cells research.

    Read More

  • Unit 731: Medical Experimentation On People

    796 Words  | 4 Pages

    Medical Experimentation on Humans Medical Experimentation on humans is Extremely controversial for some people. Many people believe that Medical experimentation is extremely unethical. Unit 731 was an Extreme Experiment,” Around 14,000 victims, referred to as ‘logs’ by their captors and including at least eight Allied prisoners of war, were murdered in unit 731 between 1936 to 1945 ” (Hill).There was no exact number of how many people died when Unit 731 happened.

    Read More

  • Inaccurate Animal Testing

    582 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal experimentation is also ineffective method. The main reason why they are inaccurate is because of the huge differences between humans and animals. Many times animals have been tested on a drug and the drug was considered not harmful. But, was then later tested on a human and the human died. Animal testing is just killing animals for no reason because there will always be the first human to test a new drug or cosmetic.

    Read More

  • A Change Of Heart About Animals Analysis

    627 Words  | 3 Pages

    I think that scientist and psychologist shouldn’t be able to do unnecessary experiments on animals. The first reason that I think they shouldn’t is because most of the time these animals don’t survive these procedures. It isn’t right to instantly end an animal’s life, as well as its wrong to end a human’s life. On top of these innocent killings us human’s show little to no remorse. Most people believe that animals don’t suffer or feel pain but according to Victoria Braithwaite even fish feel pain.

    Read More

  • The Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing

    604 Words  | 3 Pages

    Millions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.

    Read More

  • Why Animal Experimentation Is Unethical

    1066 Words  | 5 Pages

    Animal experimentation is unacceptable because it is unethical. The article “Animal Experimentation” it states, “many people object to the use of animals in scientific studies because the animals are denied their freedom and often suffer serious injury and discomfort.” People disagree with animal experimentation because the animals do not have the freedom to choose. Animals cannot speak for themselves to tell whether or not they want to get tested on, because of this then the animals that are tested on suffer a lot of discomfort and injuries. Another reason why animal experimentation is unethical because it is unreliable.

    Read More

  • Human Experimentation Persuasive Speech

    460 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another reason why I am for human experimentation is because what if we have the cure to let's say cancer but we can't do human experimentation. Just imagine we have the cure to cancer in our hands but we can't use it for dumb reasons. Think about it without all of the human experimentation we have already done helped us out when we had pain or when we were hurt.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay Why Animal Testing Is Wrong

    1111 Words  | 5 Pages

    Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay: Animal Testing Should Be Banned

    1566 Words  | 7 Pages

    It is obvious that, animals are physiologically, metabolically, and anatomically different from human beings, therefore, they will react differently from human beings. Consequently, how can results from animal experiments be reliable and work on humans yet thy react differently? It is possible for the tests to fail on humans because of the anatomic and metabolic difference. And using them for experiments so as to use the same experiments on humans is very wrong. Let us stop this cruel procedure on animals because we are denying them a normal life yet, it is not yet proven that after the process is done on animals, and it can work well with human beings (Lund et al.

    Read More

  • Human Experimentation Persuasive Essay

    944 Words  | 4 Pages

    If someone searches human experimentation online it will tell you that human experimentation can be broadly defined as anything done to an individual to learn how it will affect him or her afterwards. Experimentation on a human being is the experimentation of humans to help find cures and to help fight off things like illnesses or diseases. It can also help provide us with the medicine and knowledge of what medication should be used to treat the injury or illness medication treats things. Like headaches, sore muscles, injuries, and many more things. There is a lot of debate over human experimentation and whether it is right, if it works, or if it is needed at all.

    Read More

More about Why Is Human Testing Wrong

Open Document