Essay On Lying Is Better Than Skepticism

It is possible to be either a liar or a skeptic, but not both. Of course, it is also possible, and quite preferable to be neither.

IS IT WORTH TO TELL A LIE? Can anybody say “Throughout my life, I have never told a lie?” the answer is absolutely “No, I lied before” or “I lied many times that I cannot remember the number of lies”. Nobody can imagine a person who is completely truthful. In most of the incidents, people in fact do not understand that they tell a lie. Lies are so common place, they almost seem like truth. Actually, it seems like a truth to the eye of liar because liar’s world accepts it as a truth. We all accept our own truths in our own worlds. However, lies are not very harmful or serious problems. In addition to this, telling a lie is sometimes more appropriate than telling the truth. In my opinion, it is sometimes better to lie than tell the truth. First of all, it is sometimes better to lie than to tell

The idea is common in all walks of life, however, its most common existence can be found in many philosophical works. In the examining the idea of skepticism, it is important to understand why it exist. A quest to answer a common question as to the purpose of doubting the reality of specific things, is one that may or may not be worth beginning for many. Simply put, accepting reality for what it is, is the safest way to approach most situations. However, because of the existence of realism, materialism, empiricism, rationalism and idealism the validity of skepticism must exist on some plane. Early philosophers took a more broad approach to examining things from a skeptical point of view. For example, being a skeptic about a certain religion, does not necessarily make one an atheist. The true skeptic will not write off other beliefs or apparent truths. True skepticism must be void of conceit and