It is preposterous and illogical to assume that Marie Antoinette, the foreign Queen of France, was indeed a traitor responsible for the turmoil of the country because she was simply a wealthy woman of power made out to be a villain of circumstance by people trying to rationalize a situation in which they did not fully comprehend, which ultimately turned out to be a simple place of blame.
During the period leading up to the Revolution in France there were certain expectations as to how a woman should behave, and Marie Antoinette did not meet any of these expectations. In fact, she exhibited the opposite behaviours as women were expected to be meek, submissive, and loyal. Marie Antoinette on the other hand was out-going, confident, and loud. In his book called Emile, Rousseau argues that women should take a more active role in the family by raising and educating the children, but not be involved outside the home. Even though many women disagreed, no one cared enough to change this. Although most women in France worked as peasants, shopkeepers, and laundresses, they were defined by their gender and matrimonial
…show more content…
The revolution was inevitable because the people were unhappy, and no person in a position of authority cared enough to do anything. Although it is understandable why the people revolted, the lengths the people went to personally attack the Queen was clearly excessive, as she didn’t do anything wrong. Yes, one can argue that she lived a very frivolous lifestyle and spent a lot of money, but she was just a young intelligent girl from Austria who married into wealth and an unhappy marriage, who had no position of authority in politics. So how could she possibly be responsible for the turmoil of
The first reason the revolution is justified is that the colonists had no representatives in parliament. Parliament was a branch of the British monarchy that created laws and acts for the colonies and the U.K. The problem was, not one representative in parliament was from the colonies and knew the conditions there. Parliament was absolutely clueless. Most of this,of course, was the King’s doing.
In his work, When the King Took Flight, Tackett used a description of the humble inn keeper Jean-Baptiste Sauce to detail how an average citizen shaped the political course of France and, for that matter, the future of royal authority in Europe. Tackett used accounts from the period to detail his narrative of events surrounding the King’s capture in Varennes, France. According to Tackett, Jean-Baptiste Sauce recognized the King and his family and housed them in his home to prevent them from fleeing abroad. The actions of this concerned average citizens ultimately led to the King being forced to return to Paris. Once there, events quickly compounded until eventually the King and his wife Queen Marie Antoinette were both beheaded in 1783.
The stereotypical view of women is that they should have multiple children, clean, cook, and be obedient. Women had no authority or independence, women who were married couldn’t own property, or work unless given permission from their
The Revolution was caused by the British and their taxes. The british just taxed the colonists to gain more wealth, and it wasn’t because they really needed the money for important things. The colonists were tired of the british making them spend extra money on things that they had felt were essential for life such as paper and tea. Because of this, they revolted. The Daughters of Liberty decided that they wouldn’t buy
The next chapter highlights the gendered division of labor and the difficulty to keep a family as a slave. Chapter six and seven moves on to the eighteenth century and shows how women have improved in areas such as more political participation and increasing social class of
She views the French Revolution as an act of liberation. The driving force behind the revolution came from the poor. The needs of the poor were not being met so they overthrew the government without a plan to found a new one. The American revolution was successful because it had the plan to reform government. It was driven by the idea of a new form of government rather than meeting the needs of the poor.
Men believed that women served only one purpose which was to take care of the household. Being a wife and a mother was considered
Women were the nurturers of their family. Beginning in 1605 when women began arriving in the colonies, they cooked, cleaned and raised their children to the best of their abilities. Women had little to no education and most could not
The life of a 19th-century industrial worker was far from easy. Even in good times wages were low, hours long, and working conditions hazardous. Trying to fix the issue, many Europeans suggested much needed solutions to this problem. Over the course of the 19th century Europeans suggested that there should be equality between men women and social classes, that there should be a peaceful reorganization of social classes, and a revolution or a change in government. During the Industrial Revolution, as more factories were being built, more people were willing to do work as long as they got paid.
Women wanted to work and pursue jobs just like men did, except women couldn 't work. Based of their sex and gender people thought women needed to be a stay at home, homemaker. They thought that they needed to
Gender roles in the 1900s were expectations that society had to follow in order to have balance. However, women were the ones who carried the weight of the load in the family. In the article "I Want a Wife" by Judy Brady gave an overview of the expectations women had to undergo in society. A wife had to to keep everything in check from the care of the children to having everything prepared and ready, and filling the needs of everyone else.
They both believed that women had a very distinct role in society which was to be cheerful and follow and respect their partners. They also believed that they had little to no role in society or education and should only focus on being a good housewife, because of their inferiority to men. These ideas are continuous in the time period of the Protestant reformation through the Enlightenment because many of these ideas have been voiced by enlightenment thinkers. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant are two of the enlightenment thinkers who continued to express the ideas that women were inferior to men. Rousseau and Kant both believed that men and women
In The Family Romance of the French Revolution, Lynn Hunt examines the significance of the family and politics in relation to the French Revolution. Looking at ideas of romance that transferred over into family life, Hunt is able to investigate a shift in ideology that played a part in precipitating the French Revolution. Lynn Hunt attempts to make an intervention in the historical literature of the cultural history of the French Revolution. Lynn Hunt is a historian of the French Revolution and Professor of History at University of California at Los Angeles. More broadly, Hunt is interested in the changing of ideas and political spheres in 18th century Europe.
The French Revolution of 1789-1799 aimed to spread Liberty, Equality and Brotherhood through France and through Europe. It wished to create a French Republic and it ultimately resulted in the overthrow and executions of the King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette. It failed, however, to secure voting rights for women. Despite this, participation of women in the Revolution was clear. However, the question remains - just how did women help the Revolution, and how important were their roles?
CHAPTER I Mary Wollstonecraft criticism on traditional philosophy on concept of women Introduction: In this chapter I would like to discuss and present Mary Wollstonecraft`s criticism on traditional philosophy on concept of women. Feminist critique: Feminist criticism is concerned with "...the ways in which literature and other cultural productions reinforce or undermine the economic, political, social, and psychological oppression of women". Feminist criticism is also concerned with less obvious forms of marginalization such as the exclusion of women writers from the traditional literary canon: "...unless the critical or historical point of view is feminist, there is a tendency to under-represent the contribution of women writers" (Tyson