Racial profiling is mainly used by law enforcement officials as a way to knit out who their criminal suspects could be. Racial profiling is not benefitting anyone and has affected many people. Racial profiling has affected many lives for many years, especially people of color because law enforcement officials have often arrested, interrogated on the wrong person because of Racial Profiling. It is believed that the Racial Profiling is mainly towards the African American and the Muslim religion. Racial profiling became very high and important to do ever since September 9, 2001 because of the attacks on the World Trade Center. The prohibition of Racial Profiling Acts are not necessarily effective, because law enforcement officials still continue …show more content…
In the Bush Guidance book it states, “Racial profiling in law enforcements is not only wrong, but also ineffective. Race-based assumptions create negative racial stereotypes that are harmful to our rich and diverse democracy, and materially impair our efforts to maintain a fair and just society”. In Guidance Regarding the use of race by federal law enforcement agencies these set of rule created by then President of the U.S, President Bush, states that using Racial profiling is ineffective and wrong. And the whole point of this guidance is to TELL law enforcement agencies that they shouldn’t racially profile anyone. This only states that Racial profiling is ineffective, throughout the text, only small “what-if” examples are written and these examples are hypothetical. Throughout the text, it does not directly stop racial profiling, These hypothetical examples are not exactly related on how to end Racial Profiling. And even after Brush’s legislation of that Guidance Book there were laws made that contradicted what he thought. Take Arizona SB1070 for …show more content…
Post 9/11 islamophobia was created and has continued to rise everywhere and especially in airport security. “Look at the 9/11 hijackers,” Kelly exclaims. “They came here. They shaved. They went to topless bars. They wanted to blend in. They wanted to look like they were part of the American dream. These are not dumb people. Could a terrorist dress up as a Hasidic Jew and walk into the subway, and not be profiled? Yes. I think profiling is just nuts.”4 Racial profiling is, in Kelly’s words, “ineffective” because it assumes that terrorists are not going to adapt to changing circumstances, and, as a result, puts the police one step behind the enemy. Racial profiling focuses on an “unstable” trait—a trait that can easily be switched”. Racially Profiling all muslim as a terrorist is ineffective because, if a terrorist were to come to the U.S or anywhere, they are not dumb enough to walk in and show their intentions. Terrorist will blend in and try to pretend to live the american dream. So racial profiling is ineffective. Racial profiling will not stop, and the many security checks that one has to go through at the airport and the extra security checks that people that look middle eastern have to go through is taking it to a whole nother level in the racial profiling area. Airport security and even attendants will racially profile middle eastern people because they look like “a potential terrorist”. Racial profiling is unnecessary and ineffective because yes, people will try
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
In the essay, “Arrested Development: The Conservative Case Against Racial Profiling” written by James, Forman, Jr. Forman main claim is to address Conservatives who believe that racial profiling is effective, when it is actually doing the opposite of its intended purpose. Racial profiling degrades many people and causes more harm than good, especially young students who are already unconvinced of law enforcement. Forman persuades his audience by using statistics, stories from students, and his own personal experience.
One of the problems with racial profiling is that it is ineffective, It can be proven to be ineffective by a statistic in Chicago that shows were racial minorities were searched four times as often, but Whites were found with contraband twice as often (12 Racial Profiling Pros and Cons). Racial profiling is also patently illegal, it violates the U.S Constitution’s core promises of equal protection under law and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures (Racial Profiling). Discriminatory omissions or selective enforcement is mentioned by Macdonald in “The Myth of Racial Profiling” and also by the American Civil Liberties Union and is a problem with law enforcement that dates back to as early as the 1950’s and 60’s when southern sheriffs did nothing about groups like the Ku Klux Klan. A more recent example would be when the local police failed to respond to an African American man’s repeated complaints about property damage and being attacked after moving into a white neighborhood in Maryland, The man was eventually arrested because for shooting his gun while trying to disperse a mob outside his home. Racial profiling also is unethical and can raise racial tensions, it is unethical because it targets specific groups, while this may help narrow down a suspect pool, it also can target people who have committed no crime at all.
Racial profiling is ineffective because most descriptions of suspects are too vague and when police set up a description of what a criminal looks like, if they were to base it on the race of the criminal the amount of people who would fit that description is immense. The Boston Marathon Bombing is an example of this. When the police were on the lookout for possible suspects, they were looking for any brown men who were wearing backpacks. Elahe Izadi wrote an article titled "Racial Profiling Is Ineffective in Catching Terrorists" in which she discusses the flaws of racial profiling. Izadi points out, "Even if the public had known whether the suspects were white or "dark-skinned," that piece of information was still too vague to be useful—how
Racial profiling has become a national issue starting in 2015 (“Racial”). Judging someone for their race has been a problem ever since a minority group has been noticed. Racial profiling has spread over all over the world. Racial profiling has been a problem through the years, if the human race can learn what racial profiling is, advantages of the profiling, and the disadvantages.
When minority groups feel that they’re under constant suspicion, they’re less likely to trust police with information that can be vital to solving crimes. This is one reason some law enforcement groups oppose racial profiling. Research has shown that African Americans are more often stopped by the police than White Americans. Also, there have been cases where Hispanics, Arabs, Asian and even religious groups such as, Muslims being targeted. There have been some police departments that have created a non- racial profiling policy such as, The Houston Police Department, they have established a policy concerning the prohibition of racial profiling.
Racial profiling is morally wrong: I cannot stress this point enough racial profiling is morally and ethically wrong. It degrades the American psyche by treating its citizens as second class citizens. It generalizes,it paints with broad strokes that minorities are criminals and worthy of profiling. Not to mention that profiling by The United States is Hypocritical a country that promotes liberty,freedom and ideals of justice should not violate it 's citizens civil liberties,such as racial profiling does. Now,i will give a now famous example about racial profiling gone bad.
Racial profiling puts minorities under constant supervision and forces them to live in fear. African Americans are unable to walk a few steps in certain neighborhoods without being stopped and questioned. Similarly, Muslims and Arabs are unable to travel without being held in customs, for long hours, all while being battered with questions. All individuals should be judged fairly and without any bias. Furthermore, no individual should have to live in fear that the color of their skin would be judged before their actions and
Racial profiling is treating another person differently or unequally based on their skin tone or race. This profiling not only has to stop in law enforcements but it needs to stop all around the world because we are all seen as equal to whatever higher power there may be, and that we all bleed the same color. Police officers will neglect their duty to protect the citizens, meaning every one of any color, and search or arrest you based on your ethnicity or appearance, as well as your classmates coming to the assumption that just because your skin is anything other
Racial profiling suspicious people of specific ethnicities will create a safer place because if the police were to arrest these people then the crime rates will drop, creating a safer place. " Modifying airport profiling procedures to include scrutiny of race, gender, and age has the potential to impact fundamental consultation rights" (MacDonald). If the police were to use racial profiling as a major part to justify if a person was guilty of a crime, that would create a safer environment. Racial profiling should be allowed for the police to use because it is easier for them to track down criminals.
There are many reasons to why racial profiling is wrong. It doesn’t work, it causes death and injuries to innocent people, and it’s just humiliating and offensive to the people. Many people everyday are affected by racial profiling. Even though
NAACP 4805 Mt. Hope Drive Baltimore, MD 21215 Mr. Barack Obama President 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, Racial profiling has become a big issue in the U.S. I believe racial profiling is discriminatory. Racial profiling is defined by The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights as “targeting of particular individuals by law enforcement authorities based not on their behavior, but rather their personal characteristics.”
Racial profiling is a huge controversial topic in law enforcement. Officers should be banned from using it to build a criminal case. Racial profiling is police that can racially profile and cam contact, search, detain, or arrest persons which was solely based on the person’s race or ethnicity rather than the individual’s behavior. In society today, the issue has been becoming more of a problem and is causing issues for the
Racial profiling The policy making iron triangle can affect many people, especially people who deal with racial profiling in the U.S. Racial profiling is a serious issue in the U.S. that affect many people of many different races. A story about a half-Jewish and half-Arab women will give an example of how racial profiling affected her and what action she took to stand up for her rights. The iron triangle can help people who have been affected by racial profiling make a difference on the legislative level.
Racial profiling is a very important issue that individuals in society face every day. This problem occurs in low income or poverty-stricken areas throughout cities and communities across the nation. Hundreds of anecdotal testimonials allege that law enforcement officials at all levels of government are infringing upon the constitutional rights and civil liberties of racial and ethnic minorities through a practice called “racial profiling” (Ward, 2002). So what is racial profiling? According to the National Institute of Justice, racial profiling by law enforcement is commonly defined as a practice that targets people for suspicion of crime based on their race, ethnicity, religion or national origin (National Institute of Justice, 2013).
Racial profiling is used in different ways and is a problem that needs to be solved in the United