Was Julius Caesar a hero or a villain? Was he greedy for land and money or was he just trying to help the Roman Empire? I believe Julius Caesar was a hero and a reformer because of all the astonishing things he did to help the citizens of the Roman Empire. First of all, Julius Caesar was an unbelievable military leader and emperor.
Multiple sources say that Julius Caesar was the top military general and the best ruler the Roman Empire has ever had. According to romanempire.net Caesar gave an advantage towards Romans by having his tactics the way they were because they requied more men to use them. Even though he was able to supply more jobs for Romans, that was largely offset by the costs of the wars. He was said to have caused a large economic disruption and a large number of deaths. Even though this had happened he continued using his tactics against enemies to win as many battles as possible to reach his
Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln were similar in a lot of ways. Both were very famous political ﬁgures known for dealing with civil wars amongst their countries. They also both supported the common people and wanted to advance their countries to be more modern. Caesar updated the Roman Calendar and contributed to many reforms that helped the common people of his empire. Lincoln was a supporter of stopping the expansion of slavery which won him the popularity of the northern states.
Throughout ancient history, there have been many considerable and loyal rulers. However, there is one ruler that left a mark on his nation. Augustus Caesar impacted history and made Rome the powerful and supreme nation that we know to be today. Octavian was a fair but devoted leader. Augustus had many contributions to Rome such as conquering many lands, bringing peace to the lands, and being respectful towards his people.
We have read about Rome’s self-proclaimed valiant and persistent character (Morey, 1901), and this attitude must have been bolstered by their victory over Carthage. Rome had taken on its biggest rival up to that point, and won. It is not unreasonable to think that the confidence of its people and leaders was strong enough to encourage ever greater expansion in the future. If you think you can win, you have gone a long way toward achieving future victory. Conversely, if you had taken on an opponent with the help of one of the world’s greatest military leaders (Hannibal in this case) and suffered a defeat, you confidence would be diminished significantly.
I think Rome lasted as long as it did because, they had a complex Society they were able to conquer neighboring empires and give them a chance to govern them self as long as they paid taxes, give troops to Rome in the hope of becoming Romans. Roman way of building roads ,water systems was another key to success the army or officials could reach anywhere in Rome in days. Rome army was one that could fight for years on end and could fight individually using legions to conquered no matter how many romans you killed in battle they would just raise another army an learn from mistakes and example of this is Hannibal he was able to beat the armies of Rome but could not beat Rome itself they would just raise another army and keep fight. The Roman Empire eventually sent anther legion to his home which is where he lost no army could out last and supply as many troops relentlessly and Rome did.
During the Roman Empire, Dictator Julius Caesar had such a great impact in the world. Just to name a few, Britain, France and Germany became Roman states because he had a large influence on them. One of his most popular saying is “I came, I saw, I conquered”. Caesar's quote means that he knows he is powerful, he wants to rule the world and have every country to become a roman state. Many people from the Senate become scared of Caesar because they see that he is almost unstoppable.
Both Carthage and Rome fought long and hard for the victories of the Punic Wars. . The Punic Wars were an example of Rome's great wealth and size, and Cartridges leaders, strategies and government. Hannibal strategies, bravery and determination led him to be very successful in the first Punic War, but because of his lack of support from the council and small army, gave rome a great leg up, leading them to victory. If Rome's wealth and size was removed they would not have had conquered Carthage.
1. Slave Society is any society where slavery was practiced. It is a society where slavery affects everything, which means it stood at the center of the economic production, and the master- slave relationship provided a model for all social relations. The south benefits from being a slave society because it boosted its economy. This can be seen where the idea of more slaves was equivalent to an increase in cotton production and their prices rose accordingly.
Slavery was an exceedingly frequent and common practice in ancient Roman times. Thus it is to be expected that it would have been implemented in many different aspects of the Roman culture including theatrical performances. An example of this is seen in the play Prisoners by Plautus, one of Rome’s most famous comedy playwrights. One item of significance that Plautus reveals to us in his play is the theme of relationships. There are many different kinds of relationships that take place within the play, however, he focuses particularly on master-slave relationships.
Agriculture dominated the south with its ability to produce exceptional wealth for plantation owners. However, they were in need of labor and so they “made all men their slaves in hopes of recompenses.” (Doc. F) Many Englishmen brought over indentured servants from Europe who served as the foundation of the labor force for plantations. Soon enough, ¾ of the population in the south colonies were made of indentured servants.
In Roman comedy, like in Greek comedy that came before it, Roman writers enjoyed to poke fun at social norms. Augustus sought to protect the Roman Empire’s longevity and in doing so elevated the power held by the paterfamilias. In a Roman family absolute authority is held by the father or the head of the household. The power of the paterfamilias was unrestricted and enabled him as the head of the house to control every aspect in the lives of his family. Most dramatically the form of this power was exercised in vitae necisque potestas or his ability to sentence his family members to death.
How did slaves affect the daily Roman economy? The slaves had a very important role in roman society, either by their significant number or by the effect they had on the roman economy. Roman in early days, despite the existence of slavery culture, did not rely on their slaves, mainly because of their insignificant number or because of the roman culture of self-reliant and self-efficiency. As their republic grew larger, and they involved in more wars, they captured and enslaved the defeated people.
It is clear that slavery existed in all cultures at this point in time. The use of codes and laws in regards to slavery in the early centuries influenced Roman and Germanic culture, as can be seen in Slave Law in Roman and Germanic Society. On one side of the Mediterranean, in Egypt and Mesopotamia, slaves were people who were repaying debts, being sold in light of financial hardship, war captives, or criminals being punished. Slaves worked on various tasks, including farming, and administrative work.
Even though Imperialism led to slavery and other bad things, we benefited by getting a better healthcare, education, transportation, and lots more. Imperialism lead to exposure to other cultures, religions spreading, free resources for mother countries, languages spreading, and more workers that lead to a growing population. Imperialism influenced some of the religions in paces today. It also helped mother countries with getting new materials. One thing that Imperialism influenced was exposure to other new cultures and more religions being spread.