ipl-logo

Why Is The Philadelphia Convention Still Relevant Today

789 Words4 Pages

The constitution may help the government run smoothly in the current day, but to reach agreements on it, founders first had to workout many conflicts at the Philadelphia Convention. The Philadelphia Convention, also known as the Constitutional Convention, resolved many conflicts based off of representation in parliament and a lack of a basic rights list in the constitution. These resolutions can be seen in many events or meetings throughout history, such as specific arguments between the founders. Resolutions to the Philadelphia convention also show up in our amendments and Bill of Rights. In addition to the resolutions staying current through the means of amendments, there are also many current events that support these results.
Within the …show more content…

Today there are several examples of these compromises, such as our current bicameral government system and African Americans rights. During the convention there was a dispute between the larger and smaller states about reputation throughout the legislature. These differences resulted in the Connecticut Compromise, which led to the creation of of the House and the Senate. This event is still relevant in the United States today because this is still our system we use throughout our government. Still consisting of the House based on a state's population and the Senate which is a set number of members. Another current example is African American rights, during the convention southern states argued for slaves to have some sort of representation in population counts. Resulting in the 3/5th Compromise, Fugitive Slave Clause, 13th amendment, and the 15th amendment. However one of the most influential documents in U.S. history was drafted due to disputes occurring during the Convention, the Bill of Rights. This document is still used in American society today to describe the rights of citizens. Even though the Philadelphia Convention ended up being a major dispute between the thirteen founding states, the compromises that were made throughout would still hold true in American society …show more content…

The Virginia Plan was proposed in order to settle disagreements among states over the issue of representation. Due to the extreme differences in population between the states, larger states wanted representation to be based off of population, while the smaller states wanted representation to be equal for all states regardless of population. Today the U.S. government still uses population as a way of representation in parliament. In addition to the Virginia Plan, the 3/5’s Compromise was also created as a way to settle conflicts. This compromise was reached, because southern states wanted slaves to count as part of the population and order to get more representation, while the northern states did not. Therefore, they reached the conclusion that every five slaves would be counted as three people. However, the thirteenth amendment then goes on to abolish slavery. As well as the thirteenth amendment being current, the Bill of Rights also resulted from the convention, because some were apprehensive to sign without a list of basic

Show More
Related

  • The Summer Of 1787 By David O Stewart Sparknotes

    1497 Words  | 6 Pages

    The state representatives often failed to see the big picture, and think with the nation’s best interests first and foremost. Fortunately compromise was found and Roger Sherman brought together the Connecticut Compromise, which focused on settling the large and small state dispute. Only after three fifths and trade compromises could be agreed upon over the major arguments was the constitution made a viable option, and then

    Read More

  • Provisions Of The Northwest Ordinance

    482 Words  | 2 Pages

    Virginia Plan, or the large state plan, proposed that each state would have a number of votes based on the population. The New Jersey Plan, or the small state plan, asked for an equal number of representatives regardless of the population of the state. Obviously, smaller states would benefit from the small state plan and vice versa for the larger states. The Great Compromise combined the two plans by creating a House of Representatives which drew representatives from each state based from the state's population and the Senate which consisted of two elected senators from each state, regardless of the population. Both the House of Representatives and the Senate took action in politics and both the small and large states were satisfied.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Virginia And The Constitutional Convention

    333 Words  | 2 Pages

    This plan state that their should be equal representation regardless of the population of the state. Because of this, there was the Great Compromise. Roger Sherman proposed an idea that combined the ideas of the Virginia and New Jersey plan. This was combined in a bicameral legislature, or a two house system. Bicameralism is two houses.

    Read More

  • What Issue Or Issues Precipitate The Constitutional Convention In 1787

    1119 Words  | 5 Pages

    The issues that precipitated the Constitutional Convention were the fact that “ … the framers sought to create a new government capable of promoting commerce and protecting property from radical state legislatures and populist forces hostile to the interests of the commercial and propertied classes.” The delegates were empowered to revise the Articles to meet the country’s needs, but they took it into their own hands and created an entirely new constitution. In my opinion, the Constitution of 1787 was legitimate in the social sense but was not legitimate by legal standards. The only reason that this new constitution was accepted was because it was what the United States needed at the time so the majority of the citizens agreed upon keeping it.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

    959 Words  | 4 Pages

    he Constitutional Convention was composed of men of strong principal; men with firm opinions and the education to support those views. Their patriotism and analytical prowess fueled the Convention and its countless debates, resulting in months of writing and perfecting the document that serves as our nation’s foundation. The delegates’ intensity caused them to continue haggling over details up until just days before the Constitution was completed. Such was the case on September 14th, 1787, a mere three days before the Constitution was sent off for ratification. Several issues were raised for discussion that day, including that of impeachment, the publication of all the proceedings of the lower house of Congress, and the appointment of a national

    Read More

  • Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    At the Constitutional Convention, our founding fathers met to reconstruct the Articles of Confederation, not knowing that they would create the United States Constitution, an entire new format of government. They wanted to create a government that was powerful yet restricted in certain ways, in order to create equal representation for all people. Three main compromises were made at the Constitutional Convention. These compromises were The Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the addition of the Bill of Rights.

    Read More

  • How Did The Constitutional Convention Still Impact American Today

    259 Words  | 2 Pages

    Constitutional Convention On May 25, 1787, 55 delegates met at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. They met to revise the Articles of Confederation. They did this to make sure that the American People of the time period were happy with the government. The events of the nation’s history still impact the American people today.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Great Compromise

    298 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the countless debates, the Great Compromise was what the convention would come into agreement with representation by population in the House of Representatives “The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one Representative. ”(add footnote) The smaller states were pleased with equal representation in the Senate “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senates from each state and each Senator shall have one vote.”(add

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    1372 Words  | 6 Pages

    One such heated debate involved the topic of representation in the new government. Under the Articles of Confederation there was a simple “one-state, one-vote” policy (The Articles of Confederation, n.d.). In framing the new Constitution, many of the larger states wanted this to be changed to a proportional concept. The delegates from these states argued that due to their larger areas they contributed in greater amount to the nation than did the smaller states, and should therefore have a greater representation and influence. The Constitutional Convention already agreed that the number of delegates in the House of Representatives, being elected by popular vote, should be in proportion to the number of people they represent.

    Read More

  • The Constitutional Convention: The Vote For Abolishing Slavery

    645 Words  | 3 Pages

    After completing the process of the Constitutional Convention, I have learned an exceptional amount of information that can be used to take on the real world. During the convention there were many factors that impacted how the convention was run, and what choices were made. The preliminary discussion topics, the lessons learned, and the factions represented in the convention all modified the ending result. Each of the preliminary discussions with other factions prior to the convention were very important to the final decisions made. Slavery, a very important topic during the convention, was one such example that branched out into other different issues including slave trade and the abolishment of slavery.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution Dbq

    831 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The Virginia Plan was the idea of having 3 separate branches of government, and representation was to be based on the state’s population. On the other hand, the New Jersey Plan suggested that each state should be equally represented and would limit the powers to tax and regulate trade” (Crouse, Kaitlyn. " Constitution" October 2017. PowerPoint File.) Finally, the Connecticut Compromise, or Grand Compromise, settled on having two houses in Congress, the Senate and the House.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Philadelphia Convention Of 1787

    768 Words  | 4 Pages

    The ⅗ compromise wasn’t a good decision, but neither was it a bad decision. Without the three-fifths compromise, the Southern States would have cededed succeeded. However, the Southern States such as Virginia had more population when the ⅗ compromise was put into play. Therefore, they had more representation. Four of the five first presidents of the US were from Virginia because of this compromise.

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Dbq

    844 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Constitutional Convention was a meeting held in Philadelphia in 1787 to frame the Constitution. During this convention, the thirteen original states or colonies were the first to ratify this document. Under the Articles of Confederation, many leaders believed that the central government did not have enough authority. Therefore, instead of amending the Articles of Confederation, delegates, from different states, drafted a new written document with rules and regulations for a new federal government. In this government, three branches of government were formed: legislative, judicial and executive.

    Read More

  • The Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention

    1593 Words  | 7 Pages

    One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.

    Read More

  • Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay

    487 Words  | 2 Pages

    This helped guard against tyranny because when this compromise happened, both big and small states had equal representation in the Senate equally, (Both big and small states had 2 representatives). In the House, a bigger state will have more representatives. (Doc D). This helps guard against tyranny because since both big and small states have equal representation, none of the states can become tyrants.

    Read More

More about Why Is The Philadelphia Convention Still Relevant Today

Open Document