Why Is Utilitarianism Too Demandinging?

Utilitarianism is a philosophy which states that an action, a law, or a rule is right only if it produces the best outcomes which is established in the Happiness Principle. It states that ethics must bring about the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This creates many problems for management. Primarily, management is not concerned with whether an action, a law, or a rule is right but with whether it delivers profitable outcomes for the company. Also, management’s best outcome is not geared towards the greatest good for the greatest number of people but towards products delivering on ROI (return of investment). Managerial action inside companies tends to focus on the very opposite of the Happiness Principle as management seeks

Altruism, is defined as ‘a philosophy and social movement which applies evidence and reason to working out the most effective ways to improve the world’ (Singer, 2015). Since for the utilitarian only the best is good enough and hence there is no room for doing less good than you possibly can. If one fails to do what is best in terms of total well-being, one is simply doing it wrong (Bykvist, 2009). In Jacques Lacan’s theory of subjectivity. Illustrating on Lacan’s notions of ontological lack and fantasy, it states that this anti-humanism may provide a challenge of the critical aspirations found in the studies of Human Resource Management (HRM) that have maintained an impossible gap between the humanity of the human subject and the inhumanity of the managerial preparation. Turning the traditional critique around, the article explores the consequences of confronting the inhuman core of humanity itself instead of maintaining the humanity of the human by exposing the inhumanity of HRM. Quoting Lacan, it questions the idealism of ‘the human’ and asks what it would mean to critical management studies to focus instead on the imperfections and shortcomings of prejudice (Johnsen,

Altruism, is defined as ‘a philosophy and social movement which applies evidence and reason to working out the most effective ways to improve the world’ (Singer, 2015). Adopting happiness as a measure of well-being: like any other measure of well-being, happiness cannot be considered in isolation from concepts of justice, rights, and dignity. This is true at the level of individual choice as well as policy decisions; a moral person does not pursue his or her own happiness without at least minimal respect for other people, and an ethical government does not pursue the aggregate happiness of its citizenry with no thought to how it is generated or distributed (White,