Response to Context Staples has a good point with how wrong the discrimination is and how it is never right to judge someone based on their looks. Although, there are certain cases when a person has to choose a defense mechanism such as fight or flight. The woman that he first experienced the discrimination with was very outmatched compared to the larger
Marshall Cohen, in the article, “Going for the Look, but Risking Discrimination,” claims that hiring attractive college students will attract more clients. Cohen supports his claim by stating consumers will want to shop just to see the attractive employees. Cohen’s purpose is to convince the reader why hiring attractive employees is a good idea because it can make the retailer marketing increases. Cohen writes in a formal tone consumers. I disagree with Cohen because hiring only “good looking” people is discriminative, unfair, and unjustifiable.
This can lead to the individual gaining a lot of aggression and tend to leads to violence. So discrimination should be widely avoided to prevent the some of many effects that can occur. National initiatives promote anti discrimination in many ways. Firstly in all health and social care institutions there must be a code of conduct which every employee must comply with. These consist
that he could not have a lady like her representing his company. Was that really equal opportunity, when situations like this happen all the time? The best way to put it is in the words of David K. Shipler, “The American ideal embraces an equality of opportunity for every person but not an equality result,” (Shipler 88). An example of this was stated above, this woman could not get the job based on the way she presented herself even though, that was the best way that she could. Job inequality is not just by the way one looks, but research shows that with the new technology emerging, people are having a harder time getting jobs because of
Age, disability, pay, genetic information, and harassment are all considered to be part of discrimination. The most common and known types include religion, race, and gender. There are many different ways that someone’s life can be impacted in an adverse way because of who they are, and who can be themselves in a world where they are constantly being treated differently? Millions of people, all different races and religions, have been judged based on skin color and what they believe in. Starting in Berlin, Germany,
After reading “Why Looks Are the Last Bastion of Discrimination” by Deborah L. Rhode and “The Makeup Tax” by Olga Khazan, both readings focus on the concerns of appearance discrimination. Appearance discrimination can be validated, yet it cannot. For instance, it is valid to appearance discriminate an individual when an employer is interviewing him or her because it is the first quality employers examine. An employer is often likely to not hire an individual if he or she comes into the interview wearing informal attire, in contrast to an individual showing up to the interview with formal clothing. Nonetheless, it is not okay to validate appearance discrimination when it comes to an individual’s weight. In “Why Looks Are the Last Bastion
Everyone in the world has judged someone based on their looks. If we all took the time to learn about each other, the world would be a better
This is just another illustration of what society thinks a woman should look like. The endeavor of this what to wear, what not to wear is one that will go on forever, for every generation of women to enter the
Discrimination is a big problem, and people get treated differently because of their race, religion, ethnicity and much
Racial discrimination is still a concept seen in the modern day. Racial discrimination is the unequal treatment towards a group based off of their race, color, or ethnicity. “A 2001 survey, for example, found that more than one-third of blacks and nearly 20% of Hispanics and Asians reported that they had personally been passed over for a job or promotion because of their race or ethnicity (Schiller 2004),” writes Devah Pager and Hana Shepherd in their article The Sociology of Discrimination. This proves that racial discrimination is still present during the process of employment. Citizens not only experience discrimination in the work field, they also experience it at school, stores, movies, theaters, or while seeking health care.
Everyone has an unconscious bias about race, and other physical attributes and as a result, the work world is also affected by the biases (Paige Daniels). We live in a society that values race and the way people look over hard work and dedication. In my passage journal, I considered which statements on the list I identified with and explored and why that is so. I originally chose this article because I found I was able to relate to a majority of the statements McIntosh listed, but not all of them. People are oppressed due to race and other physical attributes, but I think that one’s culture also has a large affect on how they are judged and treated.
For example, a major injustice is evident given that researchers exclusively carried out this study on African-American males and did not fairly distribute the studies among all races. Additionally, medical researchers purposely targeted highly impoverished area to find participants for the study. While prevalence may have been higher among this group, the lack of any other test subject demographics indicates possible discrimination in proceedings towards this particular
From history of hundreds of decades, we have witnessed the great progress made by human, in technology and in society. But injustice always exists everywhere in this world. Injustice and unfair treatment could not be erased from the world easily. Just like the situation described by John Steinbeck, the immigrants faced injustice. But there are too many injustices that even worse in the world. In general, there are 5 main injustices in our world.
The high school students in the article “Student protests over growing gender-equal dress codes” took action against dress codes that discriminate the young adults for clothes that aren’t “of the norm.” “Not only have students been disciplined for violating dress codes, some say they've faced discrimination. A high school boy on a cheerleading team in Ohio was denied lunch in early February for wearing a bow in his hair. Boys at West High School in Columbus, Ohio, then wore bows in their hair to show their solidarity for him.” This particular student was part of his school’s athletic team and his fellow students looked at him different because he decided to wear what the other members of his team were wearing.
Any girl who has attended a public high school understands the daily dilemma of dress code. On those scorching hot days as the school year approaches summer, many girls can be found scavenging through their closet for a “school appropriate” outfit or one they won’t melt into a sweaty puddle in. Her dresses will show too much leg, her tops will inappropriately expose her shoulder or collar bone, and her shorts will be too short — at least that 's what the school says. Dress code in modern day high schools should be boycotted because they are a violation to student and parents rights, sexist, out of date, a double standard, and they disrupt a female students education. It 's fair to agree with a policy that claims stringent dress codes increase the emphasis on academics and reduce the pressure of socioeconomic status; however, these dress codes violate the students First Amendment right to freedom of expression and the parents’ Fourteenth Amendment right to raise their children in their own way.