Why Nations Fail Book Review

1974 Words8 Pages

‘Why Nations Fail’ by Daron Acemuglo and James Robinsons (RA) is one of the most highly praised books in social science in the recent years for it focused on explaining world inequality, despite the fact that this book gave no direct answer to why are some nations rich and others poor, divided by wealth and poverty, health and sickness, food and famine? But, have wished that this book existed several decades ago for nations and states would have known the roots and how to solve the problems in their nation before certain problem became a vicious cycle. In this book review, I will input the common content of book reviews—summary, analysis and conclusion.
In the earliest times, there is no absolute concept of territory but people at that time …show more content…

Democracy is not bad unless people would fall out of discipline. Leading is not selfish until a leader would gain all the praises, wealth, goodness and riches of a country. And a country would never fail if the leader listens to his people and accepts suggestion from them. After all, what happens in a small town of a country could affect the totality of their country. It is not also good it a country lets one problem stay for too long. If a problem could be solved as soon as possible, then a country could prevent another pending problem.
As a future teacher and upon reading Robinsons and Acemoglu’s Why Nations Fail, I have learned that not everything you learned long ago is the absolute truth (invalid source: geography, climate, culture and ignorance). And not all you watch from TV is the general and absolute truth (China’s real status). And of course, what you read is what you become. I will recommend the book to my family and friends and to the strangers who’ll become my new friends, we never know, maybe one of them will be the next president of our country, At least he read the book before he sat at the

Open Document