Why Online Tracking Should Be Stopped
Isn’t it horrible advertisers can follow you from site to site, even if you sign in to your computer anonymously? Not just that, they can tell if you own two different devices, keep track of your purchases (on and off line,) and share that with other people for money. Allowing advertisers to collect data (information) on innocent people does not let them give the public a better experience, it simply invades their privacy (their personal information) in ways they do not want. Because advertisers treat you differently because of the sites you go on, the lack of authority for online advertisers, and powerful cookies that can track information about you that you don’t want shared, online tracking is a awful thing.
…show more content…
In 2012 a large online travel agency called Orbitz gave Mac users more expensive hotels than PC users(Hill). Later on Staples only gave price discounts to people who used their mobile device within 20 miles of a competing store(Hill). This is horrible because they give some people and advantage over other people just because of something they did in the past or some attribute they have. Also, search engines will tell companies to give you ads for flights to or hotels in the Bahamas, even if you had a vacation there years ago and hated it! Another horrible thing about online tracking is that you can not tell a website what you are not interested in, so past attributions can hurt you in the future. Online tracking is not acceptable because websites will treat you differently then other users just because of the sights you go on or the computers you
And it should stay like this since our private information is precious to us. And for it to be ripped out of our hands, and given to local, and state governments at large can be problematic. For example, using our precious information for something other than protecting our country, can cause certain restrictions, and regulations that are would be used on any type of socialization within the internet. Take Germany, Germany social media is targeting hate speech within social media platforms. And it is called the "Enforcement on Social Networks" the communication that is considered hate speech will be removed within 24 hours after enough complaints come in.
Lastly If people can break into your computer or banking account then with certainty they can break into tracking devices! True, it does help parents and guardians know where you are but also let 's other people you don 't know and trust know where you are! The article, "Big mother is watching" Written by Teennewsweek states, "At first devices is used for applications we all agree are good, but then slowly it is used for more than it was intended." Used more than it was intended, that is exactly what I mean. Bad people can get a hold of your child find out where you live ,and even worse kidnap your child.
This completely takes away a person’s right to privacy. The government has access search anyone’s internet or library records. Taking away someone’s right to read what they please also takes away the freedom of writing about controversial topics since anyone who reads it is intimidated by the government (Jacobs and
In the article “Figuring Out the Future of Online Privacy”, Heather Kelly states couple difficulties companies face to reach a efficient level of privacy in the future. First, companies must serve the right balance between advertisers and customer’s privacy concerns. For example, it is important to attract consumers to use their browser, but it is also important for them to serve their advertisers, because the money are flowing in from the advertisers. Second, “do not track” has been difficult to enforce, even though most major browsers offer the option of “do not track”. To be specific, there are ways to make it official with the help from World Wide Web Consortium, but advertisers and other third parties are refusing the deal.
The NBC video “How Your Every Move Can Be Tracked Digitally” really opened my eyes on how much vital information is collected daily about us on our electronic devices. As technology, has grown and seems to be the way of the future more research must be done to keep our privacy private. People have grown concern about the ability to determine what we want to share and what we refuse to share. The way your tracking information is used has pro’s and con’s. A positive aspect would be the customer demographic accommodates to the individual person’s interest and likes.
But as a whole, I disagree with what Plotz’s discussed in his article, he argues that “Losing privacy has made it much cheaper to use a credit card, or buy a house”(Plotz, 69). I believe many would rather have their more privacy on financial matters than lower credit cards rates and having it be easier to purchase a home. Further, this quotes puts others opinions and motives in perspective. “The first flaw of privacy: People care a great deal about their own, but not all about anyone else’s.
These limitations are necessary in keeping the balance between being beneficial and exploitation. “Less obviously harmful are online companies’ unauthorized uses of consumers’ private data to make money through the sale of that information to advertisers and other commercial websites, or through the tracking of consumers’ physical movements or web browsing patterns†(Abbott). The indicated is a violation of the people’s rights. They include but are not limited to the fourth amendment which touches upon the right to unreasonable search and the first amendment which states the rights to freedom of speech, religion, press, and assembly. In light of these rights, organizations, laws, and other parties have taken strides to prevent the law-making bodies from overstepping.
Therefore, it is important to have the proper tracking software to maintain the
The companies also sell people’s private information to make a profit, which is making people’s private life into a “product.” Although customized advertisements are useful for buyers and positive for corporations, targeted ads invade people’s privacy because tech companies manipulatively use people’s browser histories to endorse products, and secretly sell people’s personal information for revenue, turning individuals into
I agree with you everyone should have the right to privacy to secure and protect themselves from others.
The documentary “Do Not Track” was new and interactive for me to learn about the facts, and issues of digital privacies. I figured out the minor thing that there was an irony, the documentary aware about privacy and data tracking, but they use our data to create research data of their questionnaires responses, people`s behaviour and After watching 7 episodes from “Do Not Track” documentary, I recognized that due to the appearance of the digital revolution and social media, the production of data increased rapidly among the people. Since the usage of the computation and mobile devices became familiarization for them, the number of leaving their data footprints has been increasing drastically. Nowadays, we have billions of information and knowledge
So it really boils down to if the economic gains from this trade outweigh its questionable ethicality. Saying the collection and sale of information that is going on in the internet is widespread is a large understatement. Most of the free services offered on the internet are completely dependent on this trade. Ira Rubinstein a staggering advocate for privacy has discovered that some of the companies that undergo this trade are Google, Facebook, and Youtube. Google alone accounts for the staggering “25 percent of all recorded internet traffic”, with more than “60 percent of all web-enabled devices” using their service in an average day(Rubinstein 1).
When signing up for a social networking account or an email service, one does not expect that information to just be checked without their consent. According to an article written by Molly Wood, “Google said in a 2013 court filing that users had no reasonable expectation that their email communications are confidential” (Wood 3). If any comment would make someone trust a service less, such as Google, it would be that comment. No one expects their information to just be given away at a moment ’s notice, if someone is not openly talking on a discussion board that they know everyone will see, then that person expects that conversation to be private.
The internet is becoming more and more invasive, and sites are tracking what people share, like, and search. In the article, “Facebook Joins Google as One of the Most Unethical Companies” A.C. Cargill explains how Google tracks web searches. “Every search you make is tracked, attached to a “profile” of you based on your IP address” (Cargill). Tracking people’s every move on the internet is extremely invasive, but it is impossible to avoid while user the internet. Google tracks searches; even the website's user click on to obtain information about user, which is used to tailor what users see and do not see.
Technology is growing at a fast pace and every day we see a new product or service that is available. Many times it is hard to even keep up with the latest phone, computer, game console, or software. There are so many different gadgets to choose from and even the internet is on information overload. As a result, we can no longer truly expect to have privacy.