Banning books has always been a big debate if it’s acceptable or not in the field of language arts… most Americans believe people should have the freedom to choose what they want to read. By banning books, our basic rights as US citizens are kind of taken away. Book banning affects the people who read books to the people who write them. I feel that most people banned or try to ban books because they want to protect others from different ideas and information. Banned books are basically books that are thought to be “unsuited” for their intended age group and are therefore challenged by parents to be removed from a school or any local library shelf.
Imagine if one of your favorite books was challenged or banned wouldn 't you be mad? One of my favorite books titled The Hobbit was Banned and I found this out during the middle of October. Banned or challenged book are books that people think are offensive in some way to them or others. A person 's decision to ban a book can impact others and themselves because other people will never get to read that book, therefore making people mad at that person for banning the book. They 're a lot of people who would think banning a book is ridicules like Calvert Clay.
The Great Gatsby According to Ebook Friendly books are banned or challenged for moral, political, religious, or commercial reasons. A Challenge is wanting to take a book down based on a group of people or a person. Most challenges are unsuccessful though (Banned & Challenged). There is may reasons why books are challenged but most of the time is to protect children from information that may seem inappropriate to them at the same age. Books like The Great Gatsby was and were challenged because of material that is considered “sexually explicit, contained offensive language, or may be unsuitable for any age group.
The last reason banning books is a problem around the world is how it isn't hurting anyone unless they read it and it's those that aren't such a big fan of them. Books should not be banned just because a few others don't like them. Around the world it makes so many upset that libraries are doing that. It isn't fair that others can't read what they enjoy without books being banned. It could be a problem if younger children are reading them, and it has sexual talked, cursed words, but, they could do something about it with under age
Censorship of Books Today, many books are often challenged or banned in the education system. Books often get banned for a variety of reasons such as vulgar language, sexual references, racism, etc. Lord of the Flies by William Golding is often banned by school systems for various reasons. The banning of books keeps certain ages of people from reading content too mature for their age, but it also limits the teaching material of educators. Often, novels, such as Lord of the Flies, are banned from schools unrightfully as they have a very meaningful theme that adolescents should learn.
Claim: Furthermore, books should not be censored and readers should be able to choose how to read and how to learn Understandably, some books may be inappropriate for certain individuals to read. This would be why books would be banned in the first place, to protect children from choosing a bad book. However, Jamie Leigh says, “…when it comes to censorship, is that one individual disagreement—or even widespread dispute—over an idea or form of expression does not justify restricting access for others to the same information…” Also, many books are banned for unjust reasons. For instance, To Kill a Mockingbird was banned for promoting white supremacy ("WHY WAS IT BANNED?"). However, this well written novel does no such thing.
For example, the sodomy laws in the United States banned oral and anal sex; if we think about it more thoroughly, members of the LGBTQ community were mostly engaging in those sexual activities. Therefore, those laws were made to constrain their liberties. The LGBTQ community has been a group of individuals that has been discriminated against for some time. Christians, masochists, and just society in general discriminates against these groups causing laws to be made against them. But because laws like the 14th amendment exist, the antagonists of the minorities have to cover up their hatred with laws that constitute to sex.
By examining the offensive aspects of the book, I think that it's questionable to whether or not this book should have been banned in some schools. First off , I think that one of the reasons that the book has been banned is because of the violence. Although some kids can handle gory scenes of the book, some find themselves frightened because of some scenes.One line that gives a good example of this is where in one page it states, ”Taking the kids from our districts, forcing them to kill one another while we watch” . While some find this as making you appreciate that you didn't have to go through something like this, some view
Suppressing books is an unfair choice and shouldn 't be allowed , actions against suppressing things needs be put to a stop . Books being banned has the potential to continue to decrease , people around the worlds intelligence. Banning books shouldn 't be allowed anywhere around the world globe, it shows censorship and negative publicity toward the press and author 's of literature. Banning literature is suppressive and unfair to all people. The first amendment states freedom of the press doesn 't seem that way in today 's society.
They will hear about an awful topic that is expressed in the book and flip to the page to see what it says. This is not acceptable because they are not reading the whole book and just judging a book by its cover. They don't feel like they have to read the book because of one bad word or offensive section in the book. They will hear from a source that an offensive section is in the book and tell the school to get it
One more reason I believe banning books are wrong is because, you get more choices. Librarians say that they want kids to have as many reading choices as possible, but by them banning books they can have as many options to pick what they interested in. However, if kids get interested in a series and it is banned in their school library because it is more “mature” that gives the limited options. Jaquan was in the library trying to choose a book he was interested in but he couldn 't because the book he was looking for was banned. Some people say that racial slurs are why they ban some books, but most kids are gonna learn about racial slurs in their social studies class anyway.
Book Banning I think that the root problem with the book banning/burning was the level of maturity in the certain individuals affected. Both of these books were not made for children. I think the people in charge that banned Mr Vonnegurt’s book could have done better with their solution and the people at the Biloxi school came up with an adequate solution to the problem. An example is the book by Kurt Vonnegut, but they were still taught in the classroom. Then the directors of the school destroy his work of art because it was not kid friendly, even though they were the ones to put it into the school curriculum.
(“About banned books and censorship” 3). Twilight was banned because schools believe the content is too sexual and goes against religious beliefs (Dickson 1). Religious activists also didn’t like that the younger fan base wanted to become vampires themselves (“The Twilight saga” 4). Vampire books in general accumulated a host of complains in 2009 (Stephenie Meyer joins rans ranks of ‘most challenged’ authors 3). Schools wanted to make sure the students to make sure the students realize it’s fictitious and don’t’ have a wrong grasp on reality (Dickson 3).
MIS Book Council Midtown International School should not create a book advisory council. Censoring books can create a bad vibe that can lead to drugs and pornography. Press is also being limited about serious topics that could save lives. The book advisory council would counteract the constitutions first amendment. Finally if you don 't tell the kids what is happening in the bad things somewhere in the world then they will not understand right from wrong.
Crank was a book that was banned and censored, which Hopkins disliked. She shared her thoughts on this dispute, “If you don 't like the content in a book, don 't read it. If you don 't want your child to read a book, take it away. But you do not have the right to decide “appropriateness” for everyone” (Hopkins