But with DirecTV, AT&T would not only be a nation wide TV player, but will also have access to Latin America. With all of DirecTV’s customers and new bundles providing more services, AT&T will increase its revenue and will have more to pay its stakeholders. Another problem AT&T was facing at the time was the lack of premium content on its TV service. With increasing demand of premium content on TV, AT&T customers would start to look into different services that provide it. With DirecTV, which is way ahead of AT&T in terms of content licensing, after the deal, AT&T would be able to get way better bargaining leverage for getting good content.
This would help china get more population because the more resources that you have, the more people will want to live in China. This would again let them get even more resources, meaning they would get an even bigger population. This cycle would repeat forever if they kept being tolerant. A bigger population would allow them to get better technology. The people who go to China for the resources might have lived somewhere that was more advanced than China.
Fracking should not be banned but instead developed as a means to improve the world. Fracking should not be banned due to the economical boost it gives the U.S economy and other economies using fracking. It has provided thousands of jobs to those who would otherwise be jobless. Fracking has helped the U.S and other economies become more energy independent. To stop fracking would make the U.S and other economies more energy independent on nations in the Middle East and since the Middle East is in turmoil, it is vital for the U.S economy as well as other world economies to be more energy independent.
However, there are a number of controversies over the use of nuclear energy with some supporting its use while others opposing the use of nuclear energy. Despite the controversy on whether to use nuclear energy as an alternative, nuclear power has proved to be safe, reliable, clean, and inexpensive. Therefore, Nuclear energy should replace other forms of power around the globe because it is more environmentally friendly, cost effective, and safe for use and to exist with human beings compared to other forms of energy being used today. One of the main benefits of nuclear energy over other forms of energy is that it is a clean way to produce energy. Nuclear energy does not result in the emission of any of greenhouses gases and other poisonous gases for instance, nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide.
Although currently methods of obtaining energy may not significantly alter lifestyles throughout the world, society needs to remain attentive to consequences of non-renewable energy and seek productive ways of accessing renewable energy to help improve the environment and conserve fossil fuels. For many years, fossil fuels provided a cheap and reliable source of energy, but in recent years, scientists began to question the safety and supply of the energy sources. Many scientists attribute the controversial topic of Global Warming to the high amount of carbon released from fossil fuels. If Global Warming concerns scientists about the environment, one of the options to reduce the amount of Global Warming stems from a transition to renewable energies. Along with the environmental effects of fossil fuels, rates at
In addition, thorium is chemically more stable and more proliferation resistant than uranium. The benefits itself do not directly impact the utilitarian view, but the effects from these benefits do. Such effects are a safer outcome in the event a nuclear meltdown occurs, because thorium releases less radioactivity to the atmosphere. These results provide a greater net positive consequences for utilitarians because it positively affects people in the event that an accident were to occur; thorium fueled reactors can contain the radiation much easier than uranium fueled
Energy is the lifeblood of industrial economies and the key to new developments for developing nations. Secure energy is a matter of reliable, adequate, and affordable supply. Higher oil and gas prices have not only been painful for many economies, but a spate of price disputes has also brought the vulnerability of supply into sharp relief. Nuclear power is increasingly seen as a way to reduce dependence on foreign oil and natural gas, to combat rising energy costs, and to achieve ever-elusive. Nuclear energy is a clean, safe, reliable and competitive energy source.
People believe that the infrastructure will struggle to hold the larger population and consider this a very real excuse not to allow an increase in population. While it is true that traffic will congest, the solution is very obvious; simply build new infrastructure. Luckily the government will have the ability to afford the new roads and flyovers due to the extra tax money from immigrants in their new jobs, plus the money saved from immigration enforcement. To say that it is an unnecessary cost is ridiculous as improved infrastructure is always an advantage. Multinational corporations see these countries as more attractive locations to establish branches of their business and so the cycle of more money going into the economy
In addition to this, it would also undo injustices done in the past. Legalizing marijuana would give a huge boost to the economy. This is because “Legalizing and regulating marijuana will bring one of the nation 's largest cash crops under the rule of law. This will create jobs and economic opportunities in the formal economy instead of the illicit market (“Marijuana Legalization and Regulation” Why Should We Legalize? ).” In addition to making the economy stronger, it would also help the American
The first benefit is that I will power the machine using solar panels that will be on the surface and will be connected to the machine underground. I think this is a benefit because the machine will use clean energy that will not pollute the air and will be very good for the environment. Another benefit is that the machine will save lives and money considering the damage an earthquake can do without a warning. This is a benefit because we do not want people to die or be troubled by hospital bills that they would have to pay if something went wrong in an earthquake. My last benefit is that it will create more jobs for people to work because there will have to be maintenence done to the machine and people who need to keep an eye on it in case it shows any activity.
If businesses are earning more, they will need to hire more employees to keep up with the increased sales from the minimum wage consumers who have increased the spending because they have higher earnings. This in turn causes businesses to sell more products. If a business has a jumpstart to more sales, they may discover that they need more employees, producing more job opportunities. Causing employers to recruit more employees to supply the demand of labor, which will be needed due to the increased sales. Currently, the Government provides millions of house with some type of assistance.
With technology growing like it is today, finding different ways to use cleaner resources should be easier than ever before. Large companies could even have to pay if they don’t lower their CO2 emissions. This would help motivate them to create a better environment (Source C). Hopefully these companies use renewable resources to help the environment without giving up
From the first glance, the rise of the federal minimum wage is beneficial to everyone. It will improve living standards and the country’s overall economy, create more job opportunities, and reduce the poverty rate. However, after analyzing some economic theories and reading presumption made by qualified economists the idea of increasing the federal minimum wage will not look as good as before. Oppositely to benefits the raise may adversely affect standard of living, cause layoffs and fewer hirings, or has negative effect on poverty rate. Both points of view show the significant impact that the raise of the federal minimum wage may cause and both of them are partly correct.