We may often hear others saying that “how can females combat or be as physically capable as men”. Women in the army will decrease its fighting efficiency, since training standards will inevitably be lowered. (Sowin, Joshua , 2013) For instance, Officials from the West Point Academy inform that after women were allowed to serve in the military, men are no longer required to run carrying heavy weapons, which was considered a norm before. However, the truth is that we are somehow stereotyped because of gender differences, which socially constructed. The service can be used to prove that women can also be physically capable and achieve what men can achieve.
The gender role in military as women categorized and stereotyped by men has never been easy. Military does not require muscular or gender power for leadership in combat or command positions. Some men believe that women in command will weaken the military tradition or military in context. The gender role of “women” and “soldiers” proved to many that is uncontested in World War I and II when women served as auxiliaries. Women have a long history of service in the military.
What i think about Women in combat is that it should be allowed. If women can fight or do anything of the source then they should be allowed in the military. Because what if a women wanted to serve in the military and then all the sudden they cant. Some men say that women shouldn’t be in the military because they don't know what they are doing and they have no experience and they could get hurt easier. Women have to at least try to prove they can be in the military.
If your a women you always have the fear of not being strong enough up against someone else. But in combat that 's one thing that the commanders focus on. Strength matters, to your commanders, partners, and to your army. If you decide not show that you have it, it won’t take but just a second and they’ll kick you out. Women have the strength and ability to do combat, but they just don’t show it as much as men
The perks of this acceptance would be career advancement, military readiness, and effectiveness; unfortunately, with helpful pros comes the unwanted negatives. Physical ability, tradition, and overall efficiency are just three to list, there obviously are more; however, these would prove to be the most prominent. All in all, women should be accepted into the military draft, because not only would they benefit the country in political and global ways, but the acceptance would also help those that live within this nation. Women make up just as much, if not more than the population that men do within the United States, and going by age not all men will be drafted into the military
Although the MDGs were created to raise awareness of the problem, a recent MDG Progress Report indicates that there still remains a huge gap to closing gender equality worldwide. Women are still treated like second-class citizens. The chances of finding a woman that is being oppressed or shut down are relatively high. This sudden gap of inequality can be induced in any way: forcing her to do something she doesn’t want to do, sexual violence, social or legal barriers, aborting an unwanted child or even get an equal salary. However some believe that women should not receive the privilege of gaining equality or
Elaine Donnelly claims that “Women lose more duty time due to medical issues, including pregnancy. Theiry absence may be disruptive in combat units, where concentration and mutual trust are essential for survival” (Source B). However, this claim is not true most of the time because women in the military are less likely to become pregnant unexpectedly. According to the U.S. Army Medical Department, changes have been made in the last few years so that all military women who enlist “must have a positive pregnancy result documented by a healthcare provider/lab” (Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center). The significantly lowers the chance of unexpected pregnancy and other medical problems for women serving in the military.
Two are taken captive.”(Women in the military), this shows that women can be liabilities to the group if they are not properly prepared. The moral or the mood of fighting groups have also been altered as a negative effect of allowing women into combat positions and fighting groups. There have multiple studies and tests done that “conclude that allowing women to serve in direct combat units would reduce cohesion and subsequently combat effectiveness. Therefore, the Army’s policy excluding women from direct combat is justified…”(Women in direct combat) this study shows that allowing women into the groups adds tension between soldiers and reduces the success rate of the group all together. Similar tests have been done that include particular branches.
Until recent times in the U.S., men would be the only partakers during war. It seemed revolutionary to finally allow women soldiers and front liners. This “breakthrough”, however, already took place Almost 80 years ago in Spain. During this time the women left in the towns formed their own militias and remained on standby until they were needed. Even if they weren't on guard, women help out by manufacturing supplies and such.
The implications of this being; if the group scores higher LESS test results post exercise, should landing mechanics post fatigue be implemented into an athletes training routine with the goal of preventing potential injury in the future, regardless of injury history? Elsewhere, a study by Wesley et al., (2015) looked at the differences in LESS Scores post fatigue between different sexes. The key findings of their study being; women consistently demonstrated higher LESS scores than men, with both increasing post-exercise. It was also found that a relatively short period of intense exercise was sufficient to cause significant changes in landing mechanics. The methodology of Wesley’s’ study involved fatiguing the subjects using a number of drills including; cutting, weaving, bounding, squat jumps and step-ups with the instruction for the athletes to perform the drills at ‘game-speed’ or a high intensity, however this is at the subjects discretion with encouragement from the testers being their only motivation.