There should not be zoos. Thousand of animals every year struggle with the same problem, being locked up. Although this may seem like a questionable argument, this is a major problem in this world and it needs to be fixed now. In this essay there should not be zoos because they make animals unhealthy, they treat animals badly, and animals are better off in the wild. The first reason why there shouldn 't be zoos is because they make animals unhealthy.
Zoos have been around for a very long time. One of the reasons zoos started was because people were destroying the habitats of these animals. Hunters, poachers, people who are building things like houses, hotels, etc., are all examples. Although many zoo’s pride themselves in take care of and protect sick, endangered, or injured animals, then rehabilitating them back to their home, zoos need to stop taking animals and keeping them away from their habitat for long periods of time just so they
Zoos are ethical because they provide their animals with a good life, they can save animals, and they are a good place to visit to. First Body Paragraph To begin with, the first reason of why zoos are ethical is because they give the animals a good life. The first piece of how zoos give their animals a good life is they treat them good. According to an article, A good zoo provides their animals with an enriched habitat in which the animals are never bored. They also are very cared for and have plenty of of space for the animal to live in(Lin).
Zoos can help us learn about animals and help endangered species grow in population. Without zoos how will we ever be able to get close to a wild animal and learn about their natural habitat? If a animal is about to go extinct then how could we help them while they are being hunted? A zoo is a great way to hold endangered species so they don’t go extinct, and you can adopt a animal and give the zoo money to help them.All of this show that zoos should not be closed. Many people may still disagree but they should agree because zoos can save a animals
(Rex) Children could learn the importance of life. If zoos were not existed, they have less opportunities to touch animals. According to Robert Cramer, “Zoos have many other positive reasons for existing besides education: they advance veterinary medicine, they increase our understanding of animal behavior (which helps in conservation), they contribute to conservation efforts, they provide wholesome entertainment, they create jobs, and they participate in breeding programs that help ensure that if animals do go extinct in the wild, we will still have genetically viable specimens in captivity.” Actually, there are a lot of things that only zoos can do. Taking all into consideration, zoos play an important role in our lives. .
Or have they? Imprisoning animals is wrong and cruel. Zoos should be shut down because many people think that zoos provide education to humans and conservation for animals but on the contrary, they take away their survival skills by providing sources, ultimately forcing them into dependant state, relying on humans; never being able to survive in the wild where they are still taken from. In addition, many people say that zoos protect, helping the animals, however, some animals that are not wanted are threatened by zoos,
In fact, most animals in zoos aren’t endangered, this is because zoos are almost always attracted to the more “popular” animals meanwhile, they are ignoring smaller animals who actually need protection. The animals in zoos are all most never released back into their natural habitats, and in rare cases when they are, they have no sense of reality because the zoo has taken care of their every basic need, animals do not survive for long by themselves after being released, they are unfit to cope with life in the wild. If zoos really wanted to save animals from extinction, they would be helping protect animals natural habitats, not keeping them in
Zoos were originally used to satisfy people 's curiosity to the natural world, which shouldn 't have been criticized. But with the mass-production of poor-quality zoos, alongside with it, the damage of captive animals and the safety hazard for visitors plunge zoos into the dilemma of facing elimination. What 's more, possible malfunction of zoos and the appearance of more animal-friendly zoo alternatives factor in propelling the phase-out of zoos, since it almost loses its original purpose that is to generate learning outcomes. Don 't let us go to zoos; don 't let our joy override that of
Also, these animals are supervised by zookeepers and staff who are willing to help them in the event of emergencies. 2. Education and research opportunities are available. Zoos allow children and adults to observe wild animals up close, an opportunity that is normally not possible for many people. Having exotic and large animals secured in enclosures, these places also allow researchers and scientists to perform studies to better help us understand the way animals work.
Zoos do not educate nor do they empower or inspire children to become conservationists”(Jenson E.). This proves to be significant because although some say zoos are educational they prove of no worth to the amount of information we as humans obtain. Also when children see how these animals were taken out of their natural habitats and put in synthetic homes it can damage the kids. For instance, there have been cases of bacterial infections that could possibly put the children and adult sin danger. On example of this is e. coli bacteria which can be found in some reptiles areas in the zoo.