Why Shouldn T College Athletes Be Paid

The NCAA will bring in billions of dollars in revenue from the March madness tournament each year, and the collegiate athletes don’t get a penny out of it. Division one College athletes should be paid at least minimum wage, while playing their sport and attending school. Pursuing this further, most division one athletes have been working at their craft since about grade school or even before. While putting in countless hours to perfect their craft they also have to attend school. If you add up the time spent on practice, training and games, it’s estimated that college athletes often "work" the equivalent of full-time hours for the universities they play for.There are over a million other athletes all with the same goal

He says the main problem with paying NCAA athletes is the fact that universities cannot afford to do this as many of them do not make money already, fewer than 2 dozen to be exact. Nocera says every sport of every university should have a salary cap, much like the NFL or the NBA. This idea would not cost as much as paying every player any amount. He says that the salary cap should be set with a player minimum and if you combine all of the players’ minimum salaries that should be half of the salary cap. This would add stratigies in basketball to get a bunch of players at the minimum and then one really good player with the remaining budget.

If college athletes were to receive payment, the money would most likely not be spread out evenly among the sports. College athletes can put as many as 60 hours a week at games and practices (Majerol 15). This causes the athletes to put less of a focus on their school work to focus on their athletics. Many of the top athletes never even finish their degree after playing for four years (Cooper 12-13). College athletes are encouraged to sign up for easier classes.

College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.

The NCAA should indeed pay their D1 athletes. Exploitation means treating someone unfairly to make money off of them. The NCAA is a business that gets away with exploiting athletes for billions of dollars. The National College Athletic Association makes money because there is a low supply for college level athletes, yet a great demand to see these athletes perform. So the NCAA, in a way monopolized the scant amount of college level athletes.

Should college athletes be paid? I selected this article because I honestly thought they did get paid and I wanted to read more on the topic.In this essay we will discuss the pros and cons of college athletes getting paid.I am on the pro side of this debate. Here is why. Here are the pros of paying college athletes; from the text; “Big time college football and basketball programs generate billions of dollars a year in TV and marketing contracts, ticket sales, and merchandising.” So, the athletes should be paid because the programs fabricate brobdingnagian amounts of money and they do not even pay the people who are actually the crux of the money making process.From the text; “There’s an issue of fairness,” and “The question that’s being raised here is . .

Specifically, this is focusing on how these college athletes do not get paid and why they should be paid. College athletes take many risks and make personal sacrifices in order to bring in revenue for their school, for this reason, they should be paid employees. The first reason in why college athletes should be paid is that college athletes take many risks. Depending on the scholarship, if an athlete is injured and unable to play they can lose their

Most people ask this question when starting to apply for college: Why should a 2.5 GPA athlete pay nothing for classes he probably will not even going to attend, while a 4.0 GPA full-time student has to work two jobs on top of all their classes to pay for their tuition and housing? This question has so many things untrue with this statement. This is a stereotype. The truth is that public and private schools give more money away for academic scholarships and aid than the athletics. While sports are a big part of the school’s background, the athletics department does not receive much money for that sport.

Alyssa Gonzalez #10 Ms. Graham Writing 25 February 2016 Should College Athletes be Paid? Do people ever wonder why college athletes do not get paid? Everyone needs to know why college athletes should not be paid. Many reasons include, often college athletes are already given scholarships, college students can sometimes be financially irresponsible, it may be difficult to distribute the money equally to each player, and it may be difficult to figure out which athletes get paid and how much? One compelling reason why college athletes should not be paid is because college athletes are often given scholarships.

NCAA should not have a say in it. Another big aspect to look at is the coaches. Some coaches get paid millions of dollars per season. How is it fair to the athletes knowing their coaches make that much, but they do not make a penny. When the NCAA is throwing that much money at coaches, would it not be okay if the player got a couple thousands of

They think because an athlete has a scholarship that their food and living expenses are covered. Scholarships will cover the cost of tuition and books but will not cover anything else. Some scholarships will only cover a small amount of a student’s tuition so that the student will have to take out student loans to be able to attend college. There are some athletes that could possible still be paying off their student loans fifteen to twenty years after graduating from college. In Rich Hofmann’s newspaper article, “Jim Delany, the commissioner of the big ten, talked about wanting to consider the possibility of paying scholarship athletes a stipend of somewhere between $2,000 and $5,000 to cover the full cost of attending college”, but nothing was ever set into place.

A growing debate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association is whether or not student athletes should be paid. The controversy began in 2011 after three hundred coaches and athletes signed a petition to pay college-level athletes, and since then other athletes have made several more arguments. The NCAA has rightfully denied all of the requests, saying they include too much. To pay student athletes could be hugely expensive for colleges, especially because they would not only pay for each athlete’s degree and equipment, but also provide a salary and give bonuses revenue for tournaments. Moreover, college athletes should not be paid because there is not enough money, it takes away a student’s focus from schoolwork, and not every athlete is guaranteed a professional career after graduating; however it is argued that it they are already paid in a way.

First, scholarships aren’t being benefited from due to the lack of time the athlete has. Second, student-athletes often end up with low paying jobs, so a pay rate in college could help them out after finishing school. Third, college sports have profited millions of dollars off of these student-athletes and they only receive a scholarship. Make it or break it, one former athlete works a minimum wage job, while a rookie in the professional league is making millions. The lesson learned is that college athletes are being exploited.

The National Collegiate Athletic Association claims that college athletes receive ample education but the athletes are out of class significant amounts of time for practice and travel (Alessi). Colleges take away scholarships and give them to other athletes when ones eligibility in a sport is over to bring the National Collegiate Athletic Association more money (Watkins 90). Normal people are paid for work while a college athlete works hard every day and receive no compensation. College athletes have to be successful academically and athletically or they can even be stripped of their scholarships (Watkins 89-90). Doing this requires extensive amounts of time and effort by the college athlete.

The NCAA has been known for (National College Athletic Association) awarding a large sum of $1.5 billion in athletic scholarships each year (Lewis and Williams 22). Such benefit allows athletes to earn the priceless value of a education for free (Roberts). Not only that, but by obtaining an degree an individual adds almost $17, 089 per year to a future career pay (Schneider). Studies have concluded that these degrees are almost unearned. According to former tutor at the University of North Carolina, students conduct “alleged academic fraud and corruption” through easy grading and “so-called paper classes” (Neuhauser 11).