The restaurant Munchy’s is banning students from noon to three and that is unjust to teenagers. Munchy is claiming that teenagers are noisy and will disconcert the adults. The business is banning them to bring more adults in due to the data that said adults provide the maximum amount of the money. Teenagers are angry though and are planning a protest. Munchy has a populous amount of advocates, but however there are an abundant of others who oppose the idea and think it is unjust. Therefore businesses should not be permitted to ban people based on their age.
It is unjust to ban someone who may have done nothing wrong because of their age. They should not assume all teens are loud and will disconcert adults. He asks the adults a very offending question to those who may go there for a nice study place to “Aren 't you tired of eating lunch surrounded by noisy high school students?”(source 1 10). He is assuming all teens are loud and disconcert the adults from securing them with a satisfying amount of work done, which is unjust to those teens who may just want to go to their favorite old-fashioned spot for lunch. It is alright to ban someone for doing something they
…show more content…
Teenagers are not the only loud people either. It does not matter the age one is they still can be loud including business men or women. Assuming that teenagers are loud and annoying is not fair to them, especially if they never did anything wrong. Munchy is trying to bring in customers, which is great, but he should do it another way so he will gain more customers and the teens can continue to go, especially since if one person or a group is too loud he can kick them out. “Business people are ALWAYS on their cell phones, having loud conversations themselves” (source 4 13). The people who are loud should recieve a warning before being banned and then the business people who can also be loud will be pleased too. By focusing on that both sides will be pleased and could increase munchies profit
The students were sent home and suspended until they returned to school without the armbands. The District Court originally ruled that the school authorities’ fear of disturbance was reasonable enough to warrant the suspension of the students. The Supreme Court however, stated that fear is not enough to overcome an individual’s right to freedom
As seen in previous cases like Tinker vs. Des Moines, students have the right to political say, unless it causes disruption at school of students are promoting something that goes against the law. In the case of Tinker v Des Moines the students were not promoting anything illegal but showed their thought on the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands (Tinker). Argued in court by Kenneth W. Starr in the Morse v. Frederick case, he gave the idea that the foundation for school censorship was the case of Tinker v. Des Moines (Morse). The Justices responded back saying, that case was a different scenario as the students weren 't doing anything against the law while Frederick was encouraging the use of marijuana which was illegal (Morse).
The Westboro Baptist Church has received vast amounts of criticism for their picketing. In Louis Theroux’s documentary about The Westboro Baptist Church, a child protester is hit in the head with a soft drink, and the picketers are frequently chased away from their picketing. This is what regulations should be placed upon a group, regulations enforced by fellow Americans. This does not express that children should have drinks hurled at their head in the instance of a disagreement. However, the government should not be the ones placed with the authority to dictate the span of Americans free
Freedom of speech must always be used to an extent. We may not allow students in schools to say whatever they please without any consequence. Also, as we are siding with the Tinkers, we must not send the wrong message to students. We are not displaying that whenever a student has a stance, to go against the school’s government and to make this a national ordeal.
Rule: The Court held 5-4 that no the First Amendment does not prevent educators from suppressing, at or across the street from a school-supervised event, student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting
“The last time I was at Munchy’s, ALL the noise came from loud, annoying business people who were either on their cells or arguing with each other.” This quote proves that the students are not the only ones making the noise so they should not be the one to blame. The issue at hand affects all teenagersin school since the supposed banned is against all teenagers. Even though the ban was only brought up that one day all the noisy teens were there. Even though Munchy’s want to ban teenagers because they are loud, Munchy’s should not ban teenagers from going because business owners are equally loud, make more money during the fall, and it is a violation of their civil rights.
Banned books in the classroom Banned books there are plenty of them in the United States of America, and some schools can‘t read books we have read here at our school. How would you feel if maybe one of your favorite books was banned and say you couldn’t share it with your friends to enjoy and learn from, or books that are used in the classroom one year and not the next. When it comes to banned books and such we need to look at what banned books are with also what challenged books are and what their difference is. What are some of the cases that have come about with banned books and challenged books in schools, and why they were banned and challenged, what can we do to be the help of banned books in the classroom, and also what we can do about
The first reason Munchy’s has decided to ban teens is to bring a stop to the chaos they are causing in the restaurant. The teens are causing chaos by being noisy, obnoxious, messy, and by playing loud music. Plus, the teens are taking over every restaurant downtown. Munchy’s believes that everyone deserves a midday break from their loud and super busy lives
Munchy's Ban on Students Argumentative Essay Rough Draft Should a business have the right to ban teens just because of their age? I think not because anyone should be able to enter a business that is kid friendly. Teens or anyone at this matter brings in money for the business, so I don’t see why a business would want to not allow an entire age group from being allowed in their business. This restaurant named Munchy’s wants to do so because they think teens are scaring away customers.
Working At McDonald’s Summary In " Working At McDonald's ", Etzioni claims that fast food chains are terrible and don't give significant working background or order to kids. Etzioni contends that restaurants such as KFC, and McDonalds no matter how successful are bad jobs for kids and teens. Etzioni gives brilliant defense to his contention and gives illustrations to bolster his point. He can't help the way that McDonalds trains its representatives and abandons them with no space for creativity.
Open campus at lunch time is a huge advantage for high school students, and is a great punishment as well. The student's responsibility to come back to school on time will have consequences if students don't follow it. This will help them realize that the word is run by rules and if people don't follow them, there will always have consequences. Students will be gaining responsibility for collage and the real world after that. To succeed in life people need independence, maturity, and responsibility.
“ [The drinking age] is unfavorable because it forces youth to consume alcohol in unsupervised places that are risky and consumption may be abused.” The idea is, if the drinking age is lowered, youth will be able to drink in open, public places that can be supervised by others. By being public, it would decrease the risky behavior seen with alcohol in private, unsupervised settings. Pomata also asserts, “The age restriction inspires undesirable activities just as the National Prohibition Act did.” Some undesirable activities that are associated with underage drinking include the making and distributing of fake ID’s.
What if a kid committed a crime and didn't get sentenced as an adult for a murder? If you don't agree that kids or even teenagers shouldn't be sentenced to jail i think you're wrong because what if they did the crime to your kid or a family relative. I believed that they should be sent to juvenile hall or jail because a teenagner should be able to think what they’re doing and have the mentality that they're doing something really bad. For a kid it is a 50/50 because i also believe that they should know what they are doing is bad but then again they are kids.
Your class has listened to a radio discussion about how adults can be a good influence on younger people. You have made the notes below: Ways adults can influence how younger people behave: giving rules setting an example offering advice Some opinions expressed in the discussion: “Sometimes it’s fun to break the rules!” “If you admire somebody, you try to behave like them.”
Is Social Problems Among Teenagers An Increasingly Worrying Phenomenon? Nowadays, social problems are one of the major concerns in society and the condition got worsen year by year, mainly contributed by teenagers. Social problems emerged due to influences of the bad cultures from other countries. Teenagers cannot identify and differentiate between good and bad conducts.