Some legislators think raising the driving age would be safer. Teenagers have a high percentage of accidents. Insurance for teenagers is extremely high. Vehicles are expensive, so this would save parents money. The legal age should be changed because young drivers are irresponsible, teenagers need more practice driving, and they are too easily distracted.
Because of safety concerns, many states have increased the age at which teens can begin to drive. Virginia’s state legislature is considering raising the minimum driving age from 16 to 18. I believe that the minimum age of drivers should not be changed. If Virginia’s legislature changes this law, it will cause problems. I believe that the age of driver’s license requirements should not be raised because the teenager will not have to rely on their parents to drive them wherever they need to be, it will give them experience, and it will teach them to be responsible.
The drinking age should not be changed to 18 due to a lack of maturity, the statistics and consequences of underage drinking while driving, and the effect alcohol has on the adolescent body. Being 18 means that you are only about halfway through being fully developed.(2) Tony Cox, host from NPR News, says, “That critical parts of the brain involved in decision-making are not fully developed until years later at age 25 or so. ”(3) Based on this information, teenagers decision making skills would lean toward seeing the positive side of drinking instead of the negative consequences. The drinking age should be 25, because at this age, people won’t fall under influence from their peers like it occurs with teens.(2)
Because of safety concerns, many states have increased the age at which teens can begin to drive. I looked forward to getting my license and getting it has been a very good experience. Teens can also learn to work on their vehicles when something goes wrong, which can prepare them for the future. States should not increase the age at which teens can drive because driving gives teens more freedom, driving allows teens to work, and driving teaches teens responsibility.
Should the drinking age really be lowered when it could do more harm than what it already does now? Many people are protesting the drinking age to be lowered to 18 because that's when people technically become an adult. But humans are not reaching their full potential due to the drinking age has been already too low. The drinking age should be raised because scientific studies show that the human brain is still developing until the age of 25.
It has always been a part of cultures everywhere around the world and there is nothing different in today’s world. One major argument against raising the drinking age is that lowering the age does not reduce the fatalities attributed to drunk driving, on the contrary the amount of deaths increase as the drinking age is lowered. The article states that people who are younger still have a developing mind and they are still careless in the activities they do. According to the article the 21 age limit for alcohol has saved over 23,000 people since the drinking age was raised in 1975. Another major argument is that kids or teenagers will do what they want regardless of the rules that are in place.
21 and older: not younger Image being called at midnight being told your child died in a car accident because of a drunk driver. As a matter of fact, an estimated of 5,000 people under the age of twenty-one die every year from drunk driving (NIH). Why would we allow more younger groups of people to drink, if they have already shown that they are irresponsible? The drinking age should not be lowered to eighteen because it encourages reckless behavior, causes developmental issues, and teenagers are not mature enough.
If you raise the driving age limit, many of these teens would lose there jobs by being unable to arrive to work. When teens have careers they gain responsibility and money. Why would we want to rob them of these opportunities? These teenagers are contributing to society just as much as any adult currently is. If we raise the driving age, we would loose thousands of hard working young men and women.
People believe the drinking age should stay at 21 because an 18 year old has less tolerance as compared to a 21 year old. It may be true, but you don’t really know how much you can handle as long as you try it out. Tolerance doesn’t come with age, tolerance come with realization of responsibility and there are people that are more responsible at 15 than some are at 25. In conclusion the drinking age has its pros and cons, but the drinking age should be lowered to the age of 18 for many reasons.
Lowering the legal drinking age to eighteen would cause major health problems in the future. Having the age at twenty-one has saved over 500 lives per year. The main cause of car crashes is driving under the influence, not phone or electronic usage of any kind. Alcohol poisoning is a leading cause of death in countries with a lower legal
As I think raising the driving age to 18 is a benefit with less harm.while not raising it will harm lives.therefore,it should be discussed. Futhermore,traffic accidents is affecting the lives of the future generation. I think raising the driving age to 18 plays a part in preventing massive car crashes. As its being found that the underage drivers are more likely to go into car accidents than adults ' 'Those who favor raising the driving age say that statistics show teenagers are more likely to get into accidents than adults ' '.(Palicz).I assume if we raise driving age to 18 such incidents will decrease. I also believe adults are more prepared for driving than underage
The teenage driving age should not be raised because of the safety and emotional health it provides. Teenage driving allows young adults to gain independence. Teenagers spend a lot of time at sporting events, sports practices, after school activities and hanging out with friends, which requires parents to bring them
After all, it will only add to the total loss of life from the various errors performed by sixteen-year-old kids. It is unseemingly to keep something that has time and time proved itself to be appalling. It is for this reason that eighteen should be the age at which adolescents are given cars. The legal driving age should be raised to eighteen because it will keep the streets safer, drivers will be more mature, and it is foolish to oppose this indubitable truth.
So establishing the raised driving age, again would be redundant. In conclusion, raising the driving age would be pointless. Delaying the inevitability of car crashes and dependence on another driver are just a few of the many reasons why we should not raise it. It’s just perfect the way it is.
Most teenagers think that being able to control the car while speeding means that they drive well. Increasing the driving age will significantly condense car accidents. While some people say teenagers can develop independence, the driving age should be raised to 21 because the level of obesity is high, teenagers are immature, and car accidents are increasing rapidly. Firstly, teenagers are the ones who are most likely to act in such reckless and