Nero’s choice of Apollo the Musician places more difficulties on him than if he had also chosen Apollo the Hero. The musician Apollo was often seen as effeminate, as during this time in the literary genre, plays and operas were on the lower level of cultural entertainment. Yet, Nero chose this representation for a reason. Even Ovid claimed that Nero’s looks and choices were “stuff for women.”
Nero’s focus’ did not fit with traditional Roman ideals and morals. Nero was very concerned about personal appearance, and very different priorities. Where other emperor’s focused on military strength, which fits well with the trope of heroic Apollo, Nero did not. Nero instead was more focused on being a patron of Arts. This passage from Suetonius
…show more content…
His interest and goal of being a patron of the Arts could have worked but, for this time period, Nero took it too far. He crossed that line. He went too far into a Hellenistic direction, and this caused upset with the Romans. Suetonius further critiques him by saying, “Astrologers had predicted to Nero that he would one day be repudiated, which was the occasion of that well known saying of his: ‘A humble art affords us daily bread,’doubtless uttered to justify him in practising the art of lyre-playing, as an amusement while emperor, but a necessity for a private citizen” (Suetonius, 219). This is critiquing Nero’s focus on the arts because he is the emperor and his support and patronage of the arts should not include his own performance of …show more content…
Nero’s choices of theatrical performances were also a part of his downfall. His performances would often draw attention to negative events that were either in the relatively close past or were echoed by current events. But, even his theatrical performances were not Nero’s only poor choices.
Nero appeared to have taken all the negative qualities of Apollo the Musician: decadence, leisure, etc. He would often host events, but events that did not presume taste level, or sophistication; everyone could “get it.” In this Nero was performing to the masses versus performing towards the elite, and this again has to do with his choice in Apollo representation. Apollo the Musician appealed to the lower-classes while Apollo the Hero appealed to the elite class.
The other personality trait of Nero’s that did not appeal to the elite class was the constant, unsubtle, blunt allusions to Nero as a god or equal to gods. Suetonius wrote that, “Since he was acclaimed as the equal of Apollo in music and of the Sun in driving a chariot, he had planned to emulate the exploits of Hercules as well; and they say that a lion had been specially trained for him to kill naked in the arena of the amphitheatre before all the people, with a club or by the clasp of his arms” (Suetonius, 226). Although Augustus alluded to his favor with the god, Apollo, Nero did not. He claims to be an equal of the god,
Occupation: Emperor of Rome Born: December 15, 37 AD in Antium, Italy Died: June 9, 68 AD outside Rome, Italy Reign: October 13, 54 AD to June 9, 68 AD Best known for: One of the worst Emperors of Rome, legend has it he played the fiddle while Rome burned. Biography: Nero ruled Rome from 54 AD to 68 AD. He is one of the most notorious emperors of Rome and is known for executing anyone who didn't agree with him, including his mother.
Historical Investigation - Emperor Nero Adnan Baroudi Assess the significance of the emperor Nero to the city of rome Emperor Nero, one of the most notorious figures in Roman history, continues to captivate and intrigue scholars and historians to this day. Born Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus in 37 AD, Nero rose to power as the fifth emperor of the Roman Empire at the tender age of 16. His reign, which lasted from 54 to 68 AD, was marked by a complex mix of artistic passion, political intrigue, and ruthless tyranny. Nero's legacy is shrouded in controversy, with some regarding him as a tyrant and others as a misunderstood ruler.
Pompey and Caesar two of the greatest rulers of the Roman Republic, they were two halves of the first triumvirate. Both of these men had various vices and a virtue that played an integral part in their military and political careers. So how did humanity, greed, and pride made them powerful and feared; yet victims at the same time. This contradiction of being powerful but yet a victim gives way to how Pompey's own pride and greed got him killed, versus Caesar who was ultimately defeated by his own humanity. Pompey was a great military leader and who held great influence.
Augustus which was the name of a man that was strong and selfless and created a way of life without a dictating idiot like most colonies of rulers. He had change the way of life in Rome. This is his very own story Augustus was a very successful man. “He created a city police.
This showed the Roman people that Augustus was not about to enter them into a war for his own personal gains. It also allowed him to be seen as a peacemaker instead of a warmonger and that was vitally important to the Romans since they had suffered through civil war for the last seventy years. The people would remember Augustus as a man who protected their interests and looked out for them instead of just using them as fodder to attain more glory. This was precisely what Augustus wanted because the more people praised him for not chasing glory he actually gained more personal glory. Augustus found a way to mask his glory seeking behind other ideals and motivations and this is something that can be seen again several centuries later during the
In contrast to Caligula’s reason of madness in the case of Nero there was no sign of reason only that he as well suffered from a mental ailment in more ways than one the illness was a family trait since, yet Nero’s actions were to differ from Caligula in persecution of Christians, the endless depraved sexual encounters with both gender and lastly the way he governed showed that he loved the arts, and the theater thus giving the history some art works as well for coins. Covering the way his rule was not his own but his mother’s and tutors when they were gone, and he was clear to rule he killed or divorced his wives, but his actions always effected the Roman empire. In particular in 64 A.D, the Great Fire that set Rome ablaze for six days a historian Tacitus the saw four districts of the city burn in stating, “The city four were undamaged, three were destroyed and in the seven
Nero Was taught and given a very good education by the philosopher named Seneca, Seneca is a major philosophical figure of the Roman Imperial Period(Vogt, Katja). Nero came to the throne at the age of 17, because the death of Agrippina’s son, but as soon as the event was made public, Nero went to the courtyard, on high gaud himself, between the hours of 6 and 7 o’clock(not sure if it was am or pm), because the omens were so disastrous that no earlier time of the day was judged properly(N.S. Gill). Some of the good things that Nero did as an emperor were, that he reduced taxes, he gave impoverished senators better pay, and Suetonius says Nero devied a method of forgery prevention, and he replaced public banquetes with grain distribution(N.S. Gill; AncientHistory, Nero).
Introduction. Greek mythological heroes, and Roman mythological heroes share similar trades, however are different in many ways. These similarities and differences can be identified when looking at the means for the creation of a hero, and a hero’s life. This essay will discuse the similarities and differences in Roman and Greek heroes by anylysing the primary and secondary sources they feuture in respectively. Firstly will context be given, secondly the secondary sources in which the heroes feature, and lastly the spefic Greek and Roman hero will be compared.
Augustus asserted himself as a powerful and benevolent ruler through a variety of means, including his building program, propaganda, public appearances, military victories, and moral reforms. Overall, Augustus established himself as a powerful and benevolent ruler through a combination of building projects, propaganda, public appearances, military victories, and moral reforms. These efforts contributed to his image as a great leader who brought peace, prosperity and stability to Rome. The Forum Augustum and Virgil's Aeneid use Roman history and myth to represent the Roman past and reinforce Augustus' rule as a legitimate continuation of Rome's past glory.
(Tacitus, Annals 15) While Tacitus provides a detailed and vivid description of the fire and its destructive impact on the city, Suetonius offers a more personal and intimate view of the event through his portrayal of Nero's actions and behavior during the crisis. Suetonius is known for his vivid and detailed accounts of historical events and figures. In Suetonius’ Nero, he describes the emperor's erratic behavior during the rebellion, including his decision to abandon Rome and flee to a villa outside the city. Suetonius also portrays Nero as being consumed by fear and paranoia in the days leading up to his suicide, with the emperor reportedly hearing voices and seeing omens of his impending doom (Suetonius,
The great Empire of Rome, the greatest power to have ruled the Mediterranean. The Roman empire thrived in the time of Julius Caesar around 47 BC. Caesar had made Rome into an empire, but after he died, Rome started its downfall. It was unthinkable. The great Roman empire’s reign was over.
Although Caesar, as the upcoming ruler of Rome in Julius Caesar, should be portrayed as the ideal leader of the play, he actually has too arrogant of a character to be so. Therefore, Shakespeare places honor in Brutus and allows Brutus to have the role of the idealistic leader of the story. Although Shakespeare writes this play in a controversial time period during England’s political turmoil, he allows the audience to be able to choose the true ruler of loyalty to the crown or the honor of a noble man through the understanding of the two contrasting character
Nero didn't approve of Stoic philosophers, therefore, he had exiled Gaius. Gaius was well-known for his writings and had written 21 discourses about various philosophical and day-to-day life decisions that one would have to make during those times. Gaius's primary philosophical belief is that combating selfishness and preserving the whole human race would create the ideal society. Marcus Aurelius was a notable Roman Emperor in 180 AD. He is considered by many to be the last of the "five good emperors".
Publicly, Julius Caesar is invincible and tries to portray himself as a great leader who is able to do all things in greatness and nobility for Rome. Caesar is always careful to present himself as steadfast even in front of his close friends but even more so to the public. For example, when Caesar wanders through the streets, his presence commands respect, and he offers the best version of himself. His “I am the greatest star” speech shows that he puts in effort that’ll make him look superior to others, “ But I am constant as the northern star, Of whose true-fixed and resting quality, There is no fellow in the firmament.