Imagine if one of your favorite books was challenged or banned wouldn 't you be mad? One of my favorite books titled The Hobbit was Banned and I found this out during the middle of October. Banned or challenged book are books that people think are offensive in some way to them or others. A person 's decision to ban a book can impact others and themselves because other people will never get to read that book, therefore making people mad at that person for banning the book. They 're a lot of people who would think banning a book is ridicules like Calvert Clay. One point he made was when he they take the time and effort to file complaints rather just averting their eyes or cautioning their own children. I agree with this because if you know it has something offensive, you could just avoid it. Then there would be no need to even get the book banned for your selfish desires. Another point he talks about is how parent looks at what child are reading and if there appropriate or not. I agree with this because once they find something bad or offensive in the book that they don 't want kids reading the book and then get the book challenged. Instead, I would just tell my child what books to read or pick a benefiting book for them to avoid any bad influence from another book. According …show more content…
J.R.R Tolkien was famously known for, “The Hobbit (1937) and The Lord of the Rings (1954-1955).” Tolkien was notably”a major scholar of the English language, specialising in Old and Middle English.” This would help him in his writing for his famously know stories like The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings.The Hobbit published in 1937 was noted “a success and has not been out of children’s recommended reading lists ever since.”which I would agree because it has a lot vivid imagery and good sense of adventure for anybody to read at any age and it is one of my favorite books to read. Moreover, I believe a book decision to challenged is based on the reader 's standpoint on it and if they enjoy the
Book banning has become an ignorant and anti-progressive practice, most frequently seen in schools, often in an attempt to ‘protect’ children from certain ideas or concepts they are likely already familiar with.
Books should not be banned from schools and libraries, everyone should be allowed to be informed on what’s happening in the world and learn about diversity, despite a book having unpopular views. Opponents claim that all books should be monitored and banned if they give off unpopular opinion or can possibly hurt the public. 1.) One
Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.
Although unconstitutional, it is reasonable to understand a parent’s perspective on the ideas of book banning. Books that contain “explicit sex, violence, drug use, and the like” such as Fifty Shades of Grey and the Twilight Saga have increased in popularity among mass
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
According to the American library association "A banning is the removal of those materials. Challenges do not simply involve a person expressing a point of view; rather, they are an attempt to remove material from the curriculum or library, thereby restricting the access of others. " American library association. I would like to point out that if you read this book you will understand right away why this book is banned in schools and libraries and an author from comic book legal defense fund spoke with a superintendent at
Children just like us have a mind of their own and should be able to make their own decisions by themselves to either pick up the book or to leave it alone. Censorship does not exist in public places such as stores even though children enter stores everyday these kids have learned the decency of what they should or should not do they learned what they want and what they do not want what they like and what they do not like that should be a reason that children should be able to make censorship their choice.
First, this text states, “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics” (Procon.org). To explain, parents are banning books from schools because they do not want their children to be exposed to these inappropriate topics. Moreover, banning these inappropriate topic books would be a great deal for parents and their children. Furthermore, the same text states that “Keeping books with an inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
A parent or the student should be the one who decided whether or not the book is appropriate. Also, when a child is sheltered from the world, a book with just a bit of adult material could help them understand what really happens. It could prepare them so when they do become older and get a job, the world doesn’t put them into complete shock. Taken from Common Reasons for Banning Books, “…it is important that the reader makes his/her judgments on the book.” To elaborate on this, another person shouldn’t tell a student what and what not to read.
Rough Draft Essay #2 What do you think when you hear something has been banned or censored? Most of us think this “Oh that’s great” because it had content that wasn’t okay for people to see. Today in modern society books are banned/censored because people see them as not appropriate for people to see. The banning/censoring books isn’t the best idea because some books are banned just because they have content that is seen a “mature” or “illegal”.
Books are just that, books, that everyone has the choice to read or not to. Concern is understandable, as parents are still the guardian which is why permission slips to read said banned books will be put into place. Though banned books will not be entirely removed. Removal of one banned book would lead to the removal of all banned books. As almost every book has an opinion that somebody will not agree with.
Children should not learn about such things until they are old enough. Kids can be influenced by the things that they are taught at a young age. “Keeping books with inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from reading those books or prevent authors from writing them.” Many people think because they are banned means you can not read them. People can still read these books just not at a young age, this also should not stop authors from writing books such as To Kill a Mockingbird.
Every child deserves a proper education. Banned books are depriving students of a well rounded, culturally aware, literary education because of the culture that is discarded, the history that is being withheld, and the education that young people could get through these banned books. The point of history is to learn from it and learn from others mistakes, but how can we do that if we are not allowed to learn it. As teachers shouldn’t you be teaching us how to make judgment calls like understanding that Mark Twain was a racist, but a man of his time and that doesn’t change him being an amazing writer. We cannot learn things such as that if we cannot even read most of Mark Twain’s books.
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.