Imagine if one of your favorite books was challenged or banned wouldn 't you be mad? One of my favorite books titled The Hobbit was Banned and I found this out during the middle of October. Banned or challenged book are books that people think are offensive in some way to them or others. A person 's decision to ban a book can impact others and themselves because other people will never get to read that book, therefore making people mad at that person for banning the book.
They 're a lot of people who would think banning a book is ridicules like Calvert Clay. One point he made was when he they take the time and effort to file complaints rather just averting their eyes or cautioning their own children. I agree with this because if you know it has something offensive, you could just avoid it. Then there would be no need to even get the book banned for your selfish desires. Another point he talks about is how parent looks at what child are reading and if there appropriate or not. I agree with this because once they find something bad or offensive in the book that they don 't want kids reading the book and then get the book challenged. Instead, I would just tell my child what books to read or pick a benefiting book for them to avoid any bad influence from another book. According
…show more content…
J.R.R Tolkien was famously known for, “The Hobbit (1937) and The Lord of the Rings (1954-1955).” Tolkien was notably”a major scholar of the English language, specialising in Old and Middle English.” This would help him in his writing for his famously know stories like The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings.The Hobbit published in 1937 was noted “a success and has not been out of children’s recommended reading lists ever since.”which I would agree because it has a lot vivid imagery and good sense of adventure for anybody to read at any age and it is one of my favorite books to read. Moreover, I believe a book decision to challenged is based on the reader 's standpoint on it and if they enjoy the
According to the American library association "A banning is the removal of those materials. Challenges do not simply involve a person expressing a point of view; rather, they are an attempt to remove material from the curriculum or library, thereby restricting the access of others. " American library association. I would like to point out that if you read this book you will understand right away why this book is banned in schools and libraries and an author from comic book legal defense fund spoke with a superintendent at
Book banning is something that has happened for a long time that dates back to the book burnings. Banning books is something that is unnecessary, controlling the way kids think, and an almost tyrannical way of doing things. Book banning is not holding real concern for kids and does not encompass what actually is unsuitable for students, but encompasses the ideologies of the people who have the power to ban books. People who have such power do not base it off legitimate concerns but base it on their own personal religion and opinions.
Book banning is for censorship if It's for censorship to tell your kids what they can read and what they can watch, and it should, there, they're right to know if they should read that book or not censor it for your own child. Those advocating a ban complain typically that the book in question contains graphic violence, expresses disrespect for parents and family, evil, lacks literary merit, is unsuitable for a particular age group, or includes offensive
Book banning has become an ignorant and anti-progressive practice, most frequently seen in schools, often in an attempt to ‘protect’ children from certain ideas or concepts they are likely already familiar with.
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.
The First Amendment states, “…abridging the freedom of speech or of press…” When a book is banned, it is denying the freedom of an author to express him or herself and is denying a person the right to access that book. Although banning books is the freedom to express an opinion against the book, it would hurt the author that wrote the book and make them feel inferior. Taken from I Am Very Real written by Kurt Vonnegut, “You have insulted me, and I am a good citizen, and I am very real.” In this, Kurt Vonnegut is showing how when one of his books was banned, how offended and hurt he was by that one action. The people banning the
Children just like us have a mind of their own and should be able to make their own decisions by themselves to either pick up the book or to leave it alone. Censorship does not exist in public places such as stores even though children enter stores everyday these kids have learned the decency of what they should or should not do they learned what they want and what they do not want what they like and what they do not like that should be a reason that children should be able to make censorship their choice.
Books should not be banned from schools and libraries, everyone should be allowed to be informed on what’s happening in the world and learn about diversity, despite a book having unpopular views. Opponents claim that all books should be monitored and banned if they give off unpopular opinion or can possibly hurt the public. 1.) One
One of the reasons why I think that books shouldn't be banned is because I feel like Parents may control what their own children read, but don't have a right to restrict what books are available to other people. Parents have all the right to control what their own children read but when they are trying to limit other kids from reading what they don’t allow their kids to indulge in it becomes a problem. kids should have the freedom to do anything that's made for them
Rough Draft Essay #2 What do you think when you hear something has been banned or censored? Most of us think this “Oh that’s great” because it had content that wasn’t okay for people to see. Today in modern society books are banned/censored because people see them as not appropriate for people to see. The banning/censoring books isn’t the best idea because some books are banned just because they have content that is seen a “mature” or “illegal”.
First, this text states, “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics” (Procon.org). To explain, parents are banning books from schools because they do not want their children to be exposed to these inappropriate topics. Moreover, banning these inappropriate topic books would be a great deal for parents and their children. Furthermore, the same text states that “Keeping books with an inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from
Books are just that, books, that everyone has the choice to read or not to. Concern is understandable, as parents are still the guardian which is why permission slips to read said banned books will be put into place. Though banned books will not be entirely removed. Removal of one banned book would lead to the removal of all banned books. As almost every book has an opinion that somebody will not agree with.
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
Although unconstitutional, it is reasonable to understand a parent’s perspective on the ideas of book banning. Books that contain “explicit sex, violence, drug use, and the like” such as Fifty Shades of Grey and the Twilight Saga have increased in popularity among mass