Imagine being a student that got their driver's licence taken away for getting to many tardies and not having up to par grades, and driving is the only way you can get to school. While to some this might seem like a good punishment, this would make it even harder for you to get to school on time, if at all. A punishment meant to help you, would end up hurting you. If we have a no pass, no drive law this would only make the dropout rate worse. I do not think that we should have no pass not drive laws and that instead we need to get to the source of the problem and help the students that are struggling. The first reason that we should not have a law punishing students that we are trying to motivate to do better is because this will only hit the surface and not go deep enough to find the source of the problem. Senior researcher for the National High School Center, Yael Kidron, stated that “The problem with no pass/no drive laws is that they do nothing about the reasons that students do not go to school in the first place.” (pg. 5) There are students that are homeless and this won’t help them find a safe place to stay that allows them to get to school. For students that are struggling academically offering tutoring would help them a lot more than taking away their driver's license. This quote shows how no pass no drive would not work …show more content…
According to Russell Rumberger, “Getting their bodies in the building doesn’t mean that they are going to learn anything. It is much better in my view to be putting resources and energy into making schools better places for kids.” (pg. 5) This shows how instead of passing a law that punishes students for failing, we should help them by making schools have more resources for them and to stop making schools only friendly to those who succeed. By doing so we could help students without punishing
In this letter, the author argues that all students should be required to take the driver’s education course at Centerville High School which is a mandatory program sponsored by the high school to solve the teenage driving problems in the town of Centerville. He supports his argument by presenting some evidence, however, there can be a number of flaws in his argument, rendering it unconvincing. First, the author assumes that Centerville High School students should take driver’s program because several accidents in and around Centerville have involved teenagers. However, the evidence the author needs to provide that the accidents may have been caused only by Centerville High School students.
Today well over 50% of the states in America have a “No Pass, No Drive” law, and these states are experiencing great success in terms of education. A “No Pass, No Drive” law, or NPND, is the official name for the law that requires students to pass with a ‘C’ average before driving. There is no better way to provide a strong reasoning behind the support of NPND legislation than to observe the effects in states that are currently happening. One of the biggest arguments against NPND is that it gives students on the verge of dropping out one more reason to go through with the decision. However, this argument is very flawed because NPND actually does the exact opposite.
Should this only apply to sicknesses that might cause death or just any common illness? Should people with bad colds who just want to get home run through any light that impedes them? My reasons for ignoring the law are creating a dangerous precedent and securing a loophole for violating almost every traffic law on the books. If I do this it would become harder for us to continue to write the legal story of our society in a consistent manner. My personal agenda is breaking with the overall flow of the narrative of our legal system.
In “Turning off the School-to-Prison Pipeline,” Henry Wilson notes that the zero-tolerance policy has become a significant contributor to the raised number of young individuals being marked as a failure and eventually lead up to belonging in the justice system. Schools have become one of the biggest contributors to the raised number of young individuals being sent to prison in America. “Prisons spawn a new generation of future prisoners: there are more than two million children with at least one incarcerated parent, and these youth are five times more likely to end up in prison themselves” (49). Due to the 80’s and 90’s increased crime rate, people began to fear those in urban areas leading to the increased penalties for juvenile offenders.
In Carl Singleton’s article, “What Our Education System Needs is More F’s,” he argues that students aren’t receiving the failing grades they deserve. School systems are to blame for the lack of quality in America’s education. No other recommendation for improvement will succeed. The only way to fix the American education system is to fail more students. According to Singleton, the real root of the issue is with the parents.
As claimed by The Horizon, the student voice of Indiana University Southeast, John Renfrow states, “Because of ever-increasing prices of permits, more students are evading parking passes which often leads to tickets or towed cars.” The rise in prices of parking passes only makes for more parking violations because the students who don’t want to buy one or can’t afford one, as a result rake up on expensive parking pass fees. Sadly, parking passes have come down to be just another burden put on already stressed out students who drive to school. Ultimately, students are being put in a negligent situation all because schools are requiring unnecessary charges risking their students’ ability to get to school.
No pass/No Drive Argument Essay There has been a debate on whether California should consider legalizing the no pass/no drive law. This crucial punishment is for teen suffering in school, and teen thinking about dropping out. But is forcing teenagers to give up their licences to drive really a good thing? What would the punishment be for kids without cars- would there be any?
Parents can regulate gas money and driving restrictions to encourage good habits. Lawmakers should not raise the minimum driving age. Doing so would cause travel issues among families. Teens have outside obligations that require driving to various locations. Parents need to be able to supervise young drivers to influence positive future driving behaviors.
America’s high schools are in desperate need of help. Students should feel there is a purpose in going to school and getting an education. They need to be more motivated to go to school. The amount of tests students take in High School is ridiculous. Students need to take less standardized tests.
If you raise the driving age limit, many of these teens would lose there jobs by being unable to arrive to work. When teens have careers they gain responsibility and money. Why would we want to rob them of these opportunities? These teenagers are contributing to society just as much as any adult currently is. If we raise the driving age, we would loose thousands of hard working young men and women.
There would be less problems if kids didn’t drive under the influence. If you drive sober it saves your life and the other family’s life you could have ruined by running into them while under the influence. Personally I disagree with underage drinking. This is just my opinion but I have many reasons for it. I feel that
Teens may get jobs in this age and need to drive to there work place. If they have no licenses then they will not be able to get back and forth to work, and who wants to get up and go get there kid at ten after there evening shift? Kids will have to grow up sooner to be smarter later. They need to learn now about their driving habits. My second reason
Intro: Imagine waking up and getting ready for your day in a car that picked you up with no driver. I support self driving cars because i feel it will improve the future of driving. Self driving cars will save cost on insurance and healthcare facilities. Also self driving cars will help disabled and elderly individuals and will take the danger of driving out of the equation.
What are the Defensive Driving Procedures for School Bus Drivers? Meta description: School bus driving is a challenging and risky concern. Let 's check out the defensive driving procedures for school bus drivers, which aids them to elude adverse situations Defensive driving skills comprise practices that assist the drivers to drive the vehicle through challenging conditions. Consequently, it is essential for the school bus drivers, especially due to varied reasons.
Teens that don’t have a curfew could also held reduce DUI accident rates by being designated drives for their parents, family members or anybody else that could use the help. So, by opening up the “no curfew” it would help save many many lives.