Exotic animals need care and the time when not taken care of these animals are possibly in the direction of going extinct. Exotic animals need diligent care if not done correctly it could lead to a break in the food chain. With the “potential extinction” of animals, many parts of our planet could be destroyed; our food sources would suddenly decrease, and the ecosystem will suffer (“Ban Ownership of the Exotic Pets”). ONE MORE SENTENCE On the other hand, some may argue that they have a right to own an exotic animal and keep it on private property. Such individuals can provide the time and resources that others cannot afford.
The full process of sky burial is costly. For the people who could not bear the burden of the cost, they would put the dead’s body on a rock that is high and just let the body decay. Other animals as well as the birds might also eat the body. To those who practice sky burial, they see it as a generous act for the dead since he/she living relatives are making food available for other living things. There were some whom suggested that sky burial is to unite the person with the sky or the holy kingdom but it doesn’t seem to be in line with the Tibetan’s belief of that once the sky burial occurs, the soul leaves the body for good and there is nothing left except for the
Hunting has a deeper meaning to some people and to take that away from them is in some ways inhumane. In addition, the detrimental wildlife issues that would emerge if hunting were no longer an option to keep animal populations under control would increase significantly. The idea of keeping hunting alive is crucial to keep our wildlife safe. Hunting may not apply to all people in the world, but it has to be done. In today’s world there is no other possible way to manage our wildlife in such an effective manner as we do it now.
While it may be too late for some adults to learn the consequences of their actions on the environment and its animals, it is not too late, however, for children to learn and grow up doing the right thing. Then, hopefully this way species such as the Laysan Albatross won’t be so close to being endangered anymore and can have an opportunity to breed again. The Laysan Albatross is a beautiful species that should be seen by everyone and not something that should simply fade away. The earth needs biodiversity and taking away this exotic seabird would only hurt the earth more than how it already
For a long time there has been the debate if Zoos, Circuses, and aquariums violate human rights considering that in certain cases they help animals from extinction. While that could be the case we also see that animals are unhappy, mistreated badly, and also they are only there for the sole purpose of human entertainment. On a personal belief I think that they do violate human rights, and they should be shut down. While they can save animals, there is way too much more evidence leaning towards it being bad. Zoos, circuses, and aquariums should be shut down.
Without bees our food supply would quickly decrease. Hazel Sillver says, “Honey bees are declining in population and may be facing extinction. This is bad not just for the bees, but also for humans, who rely on bees to pollinate many plants and important agricultural crops.” Without bees, crops cannot be pollinated, which stunts growth and can cause the crop to be uneatable or it could be left with very low nutrients. Later, Hazel Sillver states, “The bee is vital…. It pollinates
It should be illegal to use animals for sports and entertainment because many times it is cruel to the animals. In most of the entertainment involving animals today the trainers are overly aggressive. Animals are taken from there wild habitat then are beaten, shocked, and whipped to make them perform. These animals are forced to repeatedly do tricks that make no sense to them. Trainers will beat the animals not because they are acting out but for the fact they
The pigs would then lie to the others and alter the rules, so they wouldn’t be breaking them. The pigs also began fighting for power. Snowball and Napoleon would constantly argue to the point of violence because they both wanted absolute power. All of this led to a lack of food and even more work on the animals. If the animals had tried harder to work together, stayed truthful with one another, and kept good intentions they could have possibly achieved their ideal
If they’ve been brought in for human entertainment at a zoo, they begin to lose this need. In some cases, this can be a good thing, like if they need a population control. However, other times, this can actually ruin how an ecosystem works. Once whatever animal is being hunted stops getting hunted, then that population will begin to overpopulate and cause even more problems than what they started with in the beginning. This cycle is never
At the very least, zoo directors were outraged at the news of both of these public dissections. The directors are fighting against the confusing oddity of the situations. They have brought up that these acts show arguable unkindness. They have also brought up that these actions are displaying the fact that these animals are being restricted from doing what they are born to do. Hunting, breeding, and exploring are all taken away when animals are captured for zoos (Parker).
“It will become more and more demanding and possessive of your time and attention, it may remain loving with you, but fly into a jealous rage with other members of your family.” First, this could be a problem because if you host something at your house, the monkey could “harm” your family too because it has sharp teeth and claws. These teeth and claws might not hurt someone but it could bite a small member of your family who can’t handle pain as well. “Your friends will see less of you, and your life and activities will begin to center around the monkey.and some of your friends and family will accept this but a lot of them won’t.” Secondly, this could be a problem because everyone would just not invite you to anything important just because you can’t leave your monkey to go to an important event like a wedding or something like that. You also may want to go to somewhere else and just get a break but you wouldn’t be able to because you have to feed your monkey and if it sees less of you, it would just get destructive so people might just leave it alone anyway and not care about the monkey anymore.”County, state and federal officials will begin to visit your home and order you around. They will send you letters; want lots of permits, licenses and paperwork.” Lastly, this could cause a problem since this would start when you don’t leave your house and stay all day
It was a time when people’s lives were at risk because families were scared they could not hunt ducks for food, a time when the Iñupiaq people came together as one to fight the law, and a time when taking pride in your culture could overpower the United States government. If it was not for the leadership skills the community and individuals portrayed, the Iñupiaq people’s way of life would be completely different due to the fact that the language, subsistence, and the way of living would diminish away or we would have to live accordingly to the urban way of
This is a problem because sometimes the fish just sits and waste and sometimes they can have fish for a party not all the fish could be eaten so sometimes people give food away to others and maybe they won’t eat it and it goes to waste we should only take what we need and no more or one day we won’t have any fish and we will have to live without it and we are going to wish we never took so much and just let it go to waste. So that is what I think about over fishing in Hawaii and why I think it is a major problem and how I believe we can prevent all our fish being taken before it is too late, so now I hope we can all come together as an island and work together a keep our fish population going up and not down and I think we can do it we just need to work together and take care of our
So why are we spending money to save them? Because if all of the animals in the world were gone, we would all end up dying because we wouldn 't have enough food to eat. Another reason why we save animals is because they make nature more unique and amazing. Imagine a world without animals, without the sounds of birds chirping as you walk through the woods. Imagine not being able to go outside and play with your dog, or not being able to see all of the different types of fish when you go swimming.
Grasses produce a chemical in distress right before they are cut from a lawnmower or attacked by insects. This shows that the grass prefers to not be cut or eaten just as the lobster did. As humans, we must eat either plants or animals to survive. If both plants and animals feel pain and show a preference to live, then how is eating one more ethical that eating the other? I believe that it is ethically permissible to kill animals and plants for food as long as we use majority of the animal / plant for practical purposes, the animal / plant is not domesticated to a point of trust that a pet would have,