William Lutz Double Speak Analysis

203 Words1 Page
William Lutz’s calls double speak a blanket term for a language that pretends to communicate but does not. Double speak makes the bad seem good and the negative appear positive, or at least tolerable. Doublespeak avoids, denies, or shifts responsibility. It can conceal or prevent thought. Basic to doublespeak is incongruity, the incongruity between what is said, or left unsaid. Doublespeak essentially is misleading, deceiving, and circumvents what is being said. I looked at a couple other articles on doublespeak to see if other possible definitions were out there and it seems to be universally agreed upon that doublespeak is a deceitful language that pretends to communicate but does not. After the reading I would agree on double speak being
Open Document