Every story has a hero. When most people think of a hero, characteristics like courageous and brave tend to come to mind. Most people think of somebody who helps everybody, somebody who does good, somebody who everybody looks up to. In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, this isn’t the case. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a play that was written by William Shakespeare somewhere in the 1590’s.
There are many people who have a strong ego. Egotism is when someone thinks excessively about themself. The characters that Shakespeare gave strong egos to helped shape the story, by giving it depth. In the book “Twelfth Night”, Shakespeare presents a few characters with a strong ego. Egotism can have many forms and are shown through people in a very full of themselves kind of way.
How does William Shakespeare write The Tragedy of Julius Caesar? Shakespeare could use many things in his work, but he uses three main types of writing that show persuasive ideas. He uses ethos, pathos, and logos to tell about the persuasion of how someone feels or thinks. In Shakespeare's work, he uses ethos which is basically based on who the speaker is. Ethos uses persuasion based on the fact that the speaker is a good, upstanding person.
William Shakespeare was an English poet, playwright, and actor, and commonly known as the greatest writer in the English language. Shakespeare's work has made a lifelong impression on later theatre and literature. In particular, he expanded the dramatic potential of plot, language, and genre. Until Romeo and Juliet, for example, romance had not been viewed as a worthy topic for tragedy. His work also influenced later poetry, and inspired many painters.
Dr. Seuss can be compared to a familiar play writer, William Shakespeare who wrote countless plays during his time. Shakespeare’s plays were written in his own conventional style that was trending when he was first introduced. During William Shakespeare’s life time, upper class citizens mainly spoke Latin and French which was considered classy. English was a form of language that everybody spoke but was not preferred. Shakespeare was very innovative because he successfully collaborated the English language with his own free flow writing style that made his use of English very beautiful.
William Shakespeare’s authorship is a major topic of debate in the literary world. Stratfordians and Oxfordians remain in a constant dispute over one question: who is the true author of Shakespeare’s works? Evidence exists that suggests several possible candidates. Besides Shakespeare, these include Edward de Vere, Sir Francis Bacon, Christopher Marlowe, and William Stanley. Though each man carries at least one piece of valid verification, none come close to surpassing that of the prominent William Shakespeare himself.
That era was known for its flourish in literary works and dramas, leading to the immense over dramatization of Shakespeare’s characters. The time period is also responsible for his flowery word choices, convoluted riddles, and poetic feel. Even though literacy was on the rise, Shakespeare still participated in the traditional style of writing, for the higher educated. It was this style of writing that audiences expected, and if he were to change it to be more casually written it would feel like he thought the less literate were unable to comprehend the style. The writing technique that Shakespeare used was far different from that of Miller.
William Shakespeare is one of the most enduring playwrights of the last 1,000 years. It is rare for an average American high school student to graduate without reading at least one of Shakespeare’s works. The themes of Shakespeare’s most famous works still resonate with readers of all ages, race, and economic backgrounds today. Love, betrayal, and revenge always seem more powerful when spoken in Shakespearean English by actors wearing tights. She’s the Man and 10 Things I Hate About You deal with teenage rebellion, friendship, and unruly family members, while still managing to embrace original themes from their source material.
As the play progresses, Hamlet has experiences that make him privy to the importance of his transience. During a soliloquy Hamlet wrestles with the thought of young Fortinbras fighting a battle for a meaningless piece of land. Hamlet says “Exposing what is mortal and unsure To all that fortune, death, and danger dare, Even for an egg-shell. Rightly to be great Is not to stir without great argument, But greatly to find quarrel in a straw When honor's at the stake”(4.4.51-56) bringing up the concept of reputation. The land, while it is not rich in resources nor is it in a strategic military position, is worth something perhaps more important to Fortinbras than these tangibles.