During the 12th century England, a young and enthusiastic prince stepped foot onto the beaches of southern England, bent on restoring the imperial dynasty of his ancestors. Henry II had inherited the fiery will of his maternal Norman lineage. Drawing from the impressive rules of his ancestors, Henry I and William the Conqueror, Henry II aggressively inherited his control of England, secured his rule of Normandy, and expanded his vast dominion under a cohesive central authority. His military achievements were only safeguarded through his political wisdom and cemented through his reformative policies. The significant changes made during Henry’s reign were made possible by the tumultuous atmosphere of England before his ascension to the throne. …show more content…
Many barons decided to revoke their oaths to Matilda, not wanted to be ruled by an Angevin lord, nor a woman reared in a foreign, German imperial court. Henry’s nephew Stephen was a safe choice for many, for he was raised in Henry’s court and was grandson of William the Conqueror. His wife Matilda was niece of Queen Edith-Matilda, making his children fit to inherit the kingdom by means of Anglo-Saxon and Norman royal bloodlines. Stephen’s usurpation of the throne was made possible by Matilda’s absence during her father’s death and by the support Stephen had gathered from many of the Anglo-Norman nobility. Yet his grasp of the crown was not made without reaction. Almost immediately, civil war had erupted in Normandy, then in England, after supporters of Matilda, such as her half-brother Robert of Gloucester rose in defiance against Stephen. This subsequent period of civil war later became known as The Anarchy. Lasting until 1154, this period has been marked by disorder, lawlessness, and the dissolution of central authority in England. It was during this period of confusion and a weak crown in which local lords began to expand their power and control. The Anarchy was, in part, both a product and an outcome of vigorous sectionalism, local growth, and the independent situation of the
According to the Declaration of Independence, King George III was responsible for the American rebellion against the British Empire. The colonists listed 27 abuses committed by the king in the document. These repeated maltreatments established a tyrannical government in North America, which eventually led to the colonist’s revolt. The first 12 abuses established King George III’s authority as despotic instead of allowing a representative government for the colonists. For example: abuses 8 and 9 explains how King George III would further tighten his control through the judiciary.
Henry's confidence is somewhat based on the curiosity of his young age. He is confident that war will bring him honor and glory, but he doesn’t yet realise the hardships that are associated with war. “He felt that in this crisis his laws of life were useless. Whatever he had learned of himself was here of no avail. He was an unknown quantity.”
“Henry did not face a genuine threat to his position as King from 1485-99.” Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. [25 marks] I find I partly disagree with the statement. Although it’s true that Henry VII was able to overcome all of the major threats to his reign during this period of time, and some of these threats were not as major as others - that does not necessarily mean any of the events were not dangerous enough to jeopardise Henry’s position as King. Notably, Perkin Warbeck’s ability to gain support from many royals around Europe put Henry into a position where he could likely be usurped, had Henry not been smart with his foreign relations, and had the imposter had sufficient military support in order to successfully land in England.
His influence and presents throughout the first 20 years of Henry VIII’s reign is fundamental into understanding that period of time and how Henry’s politics and policies
‘The consolidation of royal authority, in the years 1487-1509, was due to Henry VII’s control over the nobility.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. It can be argued to a certain extent that the consolidation of royal authority for Henry VII, in the years 1487-1509, was a result of control over the nobility. The challenge lied in the ability to decrease their power without alienating them whilst removing their position of threat. However, there were other contributory factors in Henry’s consolidation of his royal authority, such as his diplomatic skills in dealing with foreign powers and the indispensable use of royal finances.
The transformation of the Iatros began with Alexander the Great whose conquest through Egypt, in 322-321 BC, led to the foundation of Alexandria. As he took control of Egypt Alexander the Great continued his conquest East and left one of his Generals in charge, Ptolemy I. Eventually, Alexander the Great died which lead to a power vacuum amongst his generals, who went to war with one another. In light of these events, Ptolemy I declared himself the ruler of Egypt and sought to make Alexandria the economic and cultural capital of the Greek world. Ptolemy I, had a tremendous advantage with the wealth and papyrus of Egypt and was able to basically build Alexandria from the ground up.
Imagine sitting in a temple, when your city walls are broken down by a Macedonian king. You see people all over being slaughtered, with the king smiling evilly with your king. Looking around, you see all the soldiers going from house to house, but skipping the temples in your city. The king who broke into your city is Alexander the Great. He was born in 356 B.C.E, to King Philip of Macedonia.
One of the most successful generals in history was Alexander the Great. His success was achieved by sheer force. During his lifetime he defeated Persia, Greece, Egypt, Asia Minor, and secured the Mediterranean Sea. Despite his military success, did Alexander deserve to be called “the Great”?
Henry V is a play that is rooted in war which displays the battle between France and England. The play is centred around King Henry V and the tactics he uses to succeed in overthrowing or winning the war against France. King Henry V uses persuasion to try to convince the French and the Britain’s that he is atoning for the sin his father had committed. The posters above would be used to discuss the ways in which the theme of Leadership, War and Appearance versus Reality pervades or is prominent in the play.
Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.
King Henry demonstrates to his men that he himself is not unwilling to die for England’s “cause”, and that such a death is honorable; establishing his character as belonging to a man who will not ask any other man to do that which he is not willing to do himself, to his men. This has an interesting effect on the
One of the problems Henry II faced was the barons. Under Stephen the baron had become too powerful and Henry had the issue of regaining this power. Many baron had taken advantage over Stephens lack of control and authority, several barons built castles without asking the kings permission and had taken over large areas of land Henry had to reassert his authority as the barons where becoming too powerful. If the barons carried on as they were Henrys fate would have ultimately reflected that of Stephens. Also the barons would have been seen as undreaming the king’s power and authority.
Alexander the Great was the most famous and beloved ruler of Macedonia. Alexander was able to go down as the best ruler in history. Alexander accomplished many different things while he was in power. The three biggest accomplishments were being the greatest ruler of Macedonia, conquering different empires, and spreading Hellenistic culture. Alexander came to power after his dad was assassinated.
In the play Henry IV, Part One, King Henry bases honor upon how momentous a kingdom is perceived.
King Henry is portrayed to us as the main leader within the English ranks and an important component of their strategy. One characteristic of Henry’s leadership is that he is able to forge close connections with his men. During the Battle of Harfleur, we see him describe his men as “dear