ipl-logo

Winston Churchill's Speech: Great Men Are Never Good Man?

1197 Words5 Pages

“Great men are never good men.” To be great is to be considerably above average in terms of ability, quality or eminence. To the British, Sir Winston Churchill was indeed a great man and he is most well known for rallying and leading them during World War II during his term as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. However, not all of his actions were “ethically sound”, or morally good, possessing and displaying moral virtue, as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary, even though his intentions were for the good of his people and country. Therefore, I agree with the quote and in this essay I will be evaluating the extent to which some of his decisions and actions were ethical or not. One of the most controversial actions taken by Winston …show more content…

To him, the end would justify the means, and his main aim during his leadership was victory for his country. Churchill once stated in his one of his speeches as Prime Minister: “You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word. It is victory, victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror”. In striving for victory for Britain, he had to make decisions that were not ethically sound, and take actions that were not morally right, in order to progress further and be one step closer to his ultimate goal. To many British people, this dedication and motivation of Churchill’s meant that he was a good man, as he only wanted success for his country. However, it was this same motivation that led to the unnecessary and unjustifiable deaths of millions. His motives might have been for the good of his people, but some of his actions taken that would benefit the Europeans meant that other people who were not as favourable to him would have to suffer and bear the consequences of his decisions made his actions as a whole morally wrong. Even though Winston Churchill is viewed as a great man and leader to many because of his successes, his decisions and actions to achieve that goal and get him to that position were not always ethical. Churchill’s leadership might have resulted in a victory, but to quote historian Jörg Friedrich, “this was no heroic victory” and therefore great men are never good

Show More
Related

  • Outline For 1984

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the story of 1984 Winston reveals himself as a heroic figure. His willingness to fight against the untouchable party forces him to risk his own life in many ways. Even Winston thinking poorly of the party was a very punishable crime. Even when he is being punished for his crimes he keeps proving himself a hero as he wonders and pushes to discover why the society is being run the way it is. He is also very stubborn to the thoughts of the party.

    Read More

  • Ww1 Unit 3 Research Paper

    500 Words  | 2 Pages

    Conflict: Churchill is faced with an ultimate dilemma on how to handle the devastating, intimidating Nazi forces. What happened: Prior to his election of Prime Minister, the British were hesitant and looking for compromises to avoid Nazi ruling while keeping the British safe. Instead, Churchill belives the complete opposite. According to his philosophies, such an unjust force must be put to an end by waging war against Germany. To him, the lives and toil necessary are irrelevant as there is no other alternative.

    Read More

  • Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech By Elie Wiesel

    1162 Words  | 5 Pages

    Winston Churchill states in his speech Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat “to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime.” Churchill is stressing that in order to come out of the war successfully, several changes need to be made to the way Britain performs under pressure. Churchill is calm and collected on the outside, but he is stressed and overwhelmed on the inside. He tries to get a reaction from his peers by talking

    Read More

  • Ambiguity In 1984

    872 Words  | 4 Pages

    There are two ways of interpreting his job; it can be perceived as evil, being in control of distorting and manipulating history. In contradiction to this point, he is simply doing what is required of him, his environment being what is compelling him to carry out this action. Another example of the moral ambiguity he lives in was whether or not he should of kept the article or was right to have disposed of it. Winston initially was tempted to keep the document, having it be the morally correct thing to do so, yet would be imposing punishment upon himself. Therefore, for this reason he decided that the states definition of morality was more important than his

    Read More

  • Lester B. Pearson's Impact On Canada

    1259 Words  | 6 Pages

    Today, Canada is seen as a multicultural and peaceful nation that has evolved over the course of history. This great nation would never have been possible without the impact that former Prime Minister, Lester B. Pearson left on this country. His achievements and insights profoundly affected and shaped Canada’s nation. First, peacekeeping is an important part of Canada’s heritage and a reflection of its fundamental beliefs that Pearson implemented after dealing with world changing situations and winning a Nobel Prize. Also, his contributions as a liberal leader as well as the flaws and controversy with Diefenbaker did in fact define this country.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Winston Churchill's Speech: The Sinews Of Peace

    1888 Words  | 8 Pages

    Among these discrepancies are the following: “The doctrine of self-determination was not the remedy for Europe, which needed then above all things, unity and larger groupings. The idea that the vanquished could pay the expenses of the victors was a destructive and crazy delusion” (Sir Winston Churchill Remarks, 2015). He does not believe that after World War I Germany had to pay the impossible sums of money she was asked to. These doctrines evoked further events, which would eventually favour the milieu for another conflict, World War II. He strongly believes unity and fraternity are the keys to peace.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Winston Churchill's Their Finest Hour

    1260 Words  | 6 Pages

    He was able to inspire hope in people through allusions and comparisons to the past. He was able to inspire confidence and fortitude by giving people the honest situation at hand using logos. And he was able to deliver his main message of strength and readiness by constantly referring to it within his speech. Churchill’s speech wen t down in history, not because he said what the people wanted to hear, but because he said what the people needed to hear. His honesty and rhetoric made “Their Finest Hour” one of the most crucially important and greatest speeches of the Second World War if not the past

    Read More

  • Winston Churchill's Ethical Leadership

    1835 Words  | 8 Pages

    This was the first time that another leader called out the Soviet Union for being a threat to the European values and it was labeled “The Iron Curtain Speech”. Churchill understood that even though the war was over the west could not just let the Soviet Union attempt to destroy the European way of life and that he could not sit by and let them just try to put a stronghold on Europe by spreading communism. He refused to let this happen even if he was worn out from WWII, he couldn’t be complacent and he fought back and never let up and pushed his allied nations to help protect the ones who needed it the

    Read More

  • Winston Churchill's Argumentative Essay

    169 Words  | 1 Pages

    Furthermore, Winston always believed that a person should always fight for what is right, and that is what he did. With Winston leading his country against Germany, he led with an attitude of bravery and confidence, similar to how the British were feeling at that time. For example, Winston Churchill gave one of his most iconic speeches on the special day of June 4, 1940, where he used his words to inspire people to stand up for the Allies. As a politician he even gave a speech to Parliament and told them he had, “nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat.” (history.com) He was showing that he himself was ready to fight as well.

    Read More

  • Comparing 1984 And The V For Vendetta And 1984

    1481 Words  | 6 Pages

    At the beginning of the novel, Winston made it prominent that he dissented Big Brother and his party’s idea. He wrote in his diary, in Book 1 Chapter 1, “DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER…” (Orwell 18). This shows that Winston dissented his country’s government and was willing to rebel for he knew deep inside that

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Winston Churchill's Their Finest Hour Speech

    815 Words  | 4 Pages

    Churchill stated that what he was saying was not aiming at " recrimination", and all he wanted was to give the people a clear image of England 's situation. Churchill continues his speech by telling his people that instead of worrying about the past, they rather be thinking about the future, and about all the things they could do to gain victory. As Churchill says: "of this I am quite sure, that if we open a quarrel between the past and the present, we shall find that we have lost the future. " Churchill also talked about how the people should obey their leaders and trust that were doing what was the best for

    Read More

  • The Rhetorical Analysis Of Winston Churchill's Their Finest Hour

    895 Words  | 4 Pages

    Winston Churchill, in his informational speech, “Their Finest Hour” (June 18th, 1940) explained the military situation and rallied his people for what he probably knew was going to be a tremendous struggle against the Axis. Winston Churchill supports his thesis through, rhetorical questioning, pathos, ethos and logos. Churchill’s purpose was to inform and rally the people in order to strengthen their confidence in Britain 's military. Churchill was addressing the people of Britain as he uses a formal tone, in explaining the military situation. Winston Churchill was born into an aristocratic family, on November 30, 1874 in Woodstock, United Kingdom.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis of Winston Churchill's Speech

    820 Words  | 4 Pages

    Summary: In his speech, Winston Churchill tried to inspire his fellow British citizens to go to war against Germany. He was a member of the parliament in England and later he became the Prime Minister of that state. He lived during the reign of Queen Elizabeth II, who presented him many awards. He went through World War II.

    Read More

  • Winston Churchill's Speech Figurative Language

    1274 Words  | 6 Pages

    Sir Winston Churchill was of the viewpoint that the free people of the world shall not be forced to live in a way they don’t like. He was in the favor of the democracy and the practice of democracy in the whole world not only in Eastern Europe or Western Europe. He wanted and highlighted that the Communist Soviet Union now Russia may take over the democratic Europe and force people to live in a communist society.

    Read More

  • Evaluation Of Winston Churchill As My Hero

    1255 Words  | 6 Pages

    Introduction This assignment was to write an essay on anyone who is considered a hero and evaluate them on their heroism. For this assignment I have chosen Winston Churchill the ex prime minister of Britain during the second World War. I decided to choose Winston Churchill as my hero because he was a very famous figure from recent european history. The research question I chose for this assignment was: what were Winston Churchill’s major achievements from 1893 to 1944.

    Read More

More about Winston Churchill's Speech: Great Men Are Never Good Man?

Open Document