An example of an ideology, under Shelby’s criteria, would be the thought that women are subordinate to men. This theory would be considered an ideology under Shelby's definition because the believers of this theory, who are usually men, are actually unaware of the real reason why they believe it. We can see that this is an ideology because, not only is it a widely held belief across various cultures, it is also an illusion and a theory that upholds existing oppression against women. Evidently, the belief that women are subordinate to men is an illusion because it is unclear to many why we have this belief. It could be passed down from our ancestors or it could be from ideas around the weak nature/biology of women. Take for example, a man who, wants to protect his wife in a crowded public space, unintentionally reinforces the belief that women are weaker and need the protection …show more content…
We can see that this ideology reinforces relations of oppression in various areas of life, but take for example, in the workplace. Relations of oppression are prevalent in the workplace because it is a place where it is usually male dominant. Women tend to receive more rejections when negotiating a promotion and have less access to senior-level resources, such as feedback. Women are seen and believed to need to be taken care of and protected when outside of their homes. This is because women are perceived as incompetent outside of their domestic roles and that women will never compare to a man when it comes to making money. Women are not encouraged to challenge the status quo of male authority because men do not believe that women should have power that amounts to more than, or equal to men. The largest problem here is that men do not see their beliefs as condescending or as oppressive because they just simply feel that it is their duty to protect and care for
In her text, “Opportunities for Feminist Research in the History of Rhetoric,” Patricia Bizzell references historical figures along with personal experiences to discuss the lack of feminist research in the history of rhetoric and outlines three approaches that will help diminish the issue. Bizzell’s purpose throughout the piece is not only to make the audience aware of the issue, but to ensure that the audience understands the issue’s importance and the possible approaches that may be worth exploring. Through her work, she argues that there is needed research on women and rhetoric due to the fact that its history is overpowered by the “traditional white-male elite.” (50). Bizzell claims that three approaches worth exploring are to be “resisting readers” by noticing aspects of the canonical texts that were originally supposed to go unnoticed by readers, recovering female authored texts which employ traditional rhetorical strategies, and locating work by women that has not previously
Camille Yates Dr. Paige ENGL 1113 21 April 2023 Rhetorical Analysis Essay Unit #2 Bad Feminist is a book written by American writer Roxane Gay published in 2014 that became a New York Times Best Seller. Gay exemplifies her “bad” feminist traits and contrasts them with her “good” feminist traits. The purpose of this formal essay is to broaden the definition of what a “feminist” actually means. Many women do not fall underneath the certain opinions of what “feminist” would be. Gay discovers her definition of what a feminist is by utilizing her use of rhetorical appeals and elements that ultimately successfully contributes to her purpose in writing Bad Feminist.
Next, A Woman in Berlin used rhetoric to appeal to the targeted audience. For example, the text states, “‘Forgive me. It’s been so long since I had a woman.’ He shouldn’t have said that. Next thing I know I’m lying with my face in his lap sobbing and bawling and howling all the grief in my soul (Page 104).”
33). The patriarchy was handed down from the first societies in the nation. This die hard ideology was one of the ideas that many men and politicians used to defend their refusal to accept women voters. The ideology of women’s inferiority would be a challenge to break, and still has not been eradicated
A Young Woman’s Voice in a Society That Devalues Femininity In the article “Young Women Shouldn’t Have to Talk Like Men to Be Taken Seriously,” Marybeth Seitz-Brown argues that women should not have to change their voices to be heard by a society that constantly devalues femininity. Seitz-Brown uses three effective rhetorical devices to effectively prove her argument: her awareness of the rhetorical situation, her stylistic choices, and the arrangement of her article. Seitz-Brown’s awareness of the rhetorical situation enhances her argument by tastefully adding to the feminist discourse at the time. Her target audience is all of American society because, at the end of the article, she urges that “we can do better than that” (Seitz-Brown).
As a result of this, woman are seen as in-superior to men in a once equal society.
Vaclav Havel wrote his essay “The power of the powerless” as a description and critique of the totalitarian communist government and its system. He states that Communism is different to the other types of dictatorship as it is alike a “secularized religion” rather than the usual dictatorship, which do not have any social of historical background and come to power just by the military power. He also described how the individuals are responsible for getting under the autocratic regime due to their agreement to live in a society of consumers, where the supplier is the government, expecting everyone to go with the strict order of life. In case those individuals decide to participate in that and “live within a lie”, they are bounded with the communism.
The lists go on and on and on. “Traditional values”, “gender roles”, in many ways these words can be used to mean, “Make women lesser beings than men”. And that
Especially, unfair treatment of women ("Merriam-Webster.com"). For example, sexism in the military. Many men do not think women should be in combat because, the tests would be varied and there are not adequate restrooms available for women in combat. I feel that a woman could hold her own being in the military and there should be no barring placed on women. Next, classism is differential treatment based
I believe that men as a gender are also oppressed. Oppression can be defined as the systematic mistreatment of people within a social identity group. Frye uses a bird cage, to explain oppression, saying that one may not view the wires as harmful, but all together, they leave you imprisoned, sometimes without your knowledge. This means that, women may be oppressed without the understanding or realization of what is going on. With one wire or barrier alone, a bird can just fly around it and be free, but when
Men have given the media this unrealistic image that women cannot fend for themselves, cannot do hard jobs, or cannot get as far in life as a man. Even in jobs, though a woman and a man may be in the same position, women “earn just 74 cents for every $1 a man earns” (CNNMoney). This is truly unfair, yet men today still say that women are “equal,” though it is obviously false. Women today, though they have more rights than in the 1800’s, are still not in the place we need to be in ranking with men. Women are still abused, sexually harassed and mistreated more than men because of their sex.
In Ancient Greek Civilization, women were viewed as submissive. A man always controlled the women; that either being the Father or Husband. Women were forced to stay in the house and complete all household duties. Women were not even granted the right to attend assemblies, participate in politics, or even represent themselves in court. Having little to no overall power in your society can have a huge burden on Women but this can also fuel certain Women to strive to change the society they live in.
Even women has been running for the most powerful positions and people want the traditional “male” figure to run things. For instance, why hasn’t there been any woman as presidents? In most people eyes they believe that woman are too emotional and can’t handle well under pressure in the position of power. Who is people to tell us that woman are too emotional? Males who seem to have the “upper hand” in things and best known to be dominate try to take our courage.
Moving forward, Shelby argues that his theory of ideology is one that is different from the historical use of the term “ideology”. The historical use of the term "ideology" is the nonevaluative use (Shelby, 156). This use of the term does not make any claims about epistemic defect and is morally neutral (Shelby, 156). That is, it does not contain any judgement and is mostly used for description (Shelby, 156). For example, historically, the term "ideology" is used more commonly to describe a set of political beliefs (Shelby, 156).
Many women limit themselves by stay home and not taking on their own jobs, not driving because their husbands don’t want them to, and not following their aspirations because of what their husbands need. It’s almost implied that it has to be that way in many places. Especially in countries like India and countries in the middle east, it’s socially and physically extremely hard for women to to have a position of power similar to what men do. Even if women do get a good job, or a political position, most men don’t take them seriously and don’t respect them. The disrespect doesn’t just fall in India and the middle east, even American women are subjected to oppression that is now a part of the