What would come to mind if suddenly women had the right of fighting alongside men in combat on the frontlines? A place that was once strictly for a man 's mind only - where courageous women were forced to do else wise - not allowed to fight for her own country? More and more women are pushing for the right to fight, and while others oppose it, some highly support the idea. Women deserve the right to fight on the frontlines because they have the ability to reach the same strength goals as men, they would not have to disguise themselves anymore, and plenty of new jobs have the possibility of being created. The main issue here is that women feel, and want to try to prove, they have what it takes to fight with men. However, Army officials do not give them a chance. …show more content…
When one takes that into consideration, none of it appears as something a dedicated woman wouldn 't be able to handle. To make basic training equal to both sexes, time standards for a woman to meet the designated goal can be lowered. While still expecting women to meet the strength goals, extra time can still push everyone to their breaking point but in a timely manner. The sex of someone has become a barrier for women because men want them to complete objectives as quickly as them as well as further neglecting the privilege to either fail or succeed on the frontlines. Karen Brooks gives a feminist view on the way armed forces treat women as a whole in her writing “Women Should Be Allowed On The Front Line.” She says, “Men and women are equally capable of bravery and heroism as they are of bullying and vilifying their own and the opposite sex” (8). When a person signs on to serve his/her country, they 're made aware of the risks and sacrifices they 're being asked to make. Women take this into consideration and still agree to it, but are still bullied
The Women’s Armed Services Integration Act was a law passed by President Harry S. Truman, allowing women to join the army. Before the act was passed, only men were permitted to be in combat, while women in the army worked in clinical positions. When World War II began, despite women not being allowed to join the “regular” army, the Women’s Army Corps was created and granted full army status during wartime. The growth in the number of women in the corps, along with the fact that they performed equally to the army, were two of the main factors for the law to be created and passed. The WAC was set to be expired in 1948, but the act was passed in the same years which meant that women would continue to be allowed to fight in the army.
The Women in Their Lives - A Vietnam War Experience The men in the frontlines would not have been successful if it were not for the women in their life. “Things They Carried ” is a collection of short fictitious stories written by Tim O'Brien. All the stories in the book are about the men who served in the Vietnam war and its influence on women that come in their life. These stories talk about the ambiguous nature of the war, the inadequacy of plain and absolute facts.
Women were well suited for providing nourishment and necessities for the army due to their skills obtained by their accustomed housework. “...the American army often recruited the many female camp followers to fill these jobs” (Brooks 2013, para. 17). They had slowly began to achieve recognition in society, especially war. It was then, that woman had begun to silently “protest” on having the same equal opportunity as men. During the war, women created a role for themselves to side amongst the male soldiers: a secret soldier.
Caylee Premo Dr. Bob English 102 19 April 2017 Women in the Military Draft The United States military is one of the most important and largest job sources within America, with supplying far over a million jobs to people across the country, this including both men and women. These jobs are given to people who chose the path to gain them; however, this does not highlight the military draft and the people chosen by it. Currently only men above the age of eighteen and below the age of forty, are chosen by a mailed notice, and drafted into the military, if an imminent emergency were to present itself; however, it would be beneficial to the country if women were also accepted into the draft.
In the feature article “All Guts, No Glory”, I agree with the author Molly M. Ginty, that women participating in combat. If I was in the military some of the things that might affect me would be probably because of my gender. First, women would not be put into battle because people think women cannot handle the work or bloodshed. They think women are better off bring a nurse for helping men in battle if they get injured. Second, they think women in combat would be a distraction.
Although women in the U.S. contributing to the war brought a good ever-lasting effect, they didn’t always receive full support. When the U.S. employed women for war, it led to Hitler mocking them for putting women to work, and women wouldn’t always be welcomed by other men. Many men didn’t want women to be working on the war front with them and didn’t feel as if women had the right to contribute. Although women experienced discrimination from the outside, there was also discrimination on the inside. Women minorities would be treated differently than white women.
The Civil War was a series of battles fought from 1861 to 1865 between the North, the Union, and the South, the Confederacy, of the United States of America over the disagreements on the acceptance of slavery. It was a long fought war with high casualties on both sides. Due to that, even more civilians were needed to become soldiers, spies, and etc. Men were always the ones that were expected to fill those positions, despite some of them not wanting to. Women were expected to stay home as the men in their life left for the war.
Women continue to disprove the stereotype that they are too “frail and delicate” to serve in the armed forces. Equality means equal rights and equal responsibilities, and if a woman can meet the same requirements mandatory for men to join the armed forces, she should be eligible for the draft. Even if the majority of citizens able to meet the requirements is still men, this would be fair as it gives all women the opportunity to attempt, and those who do meet the requirements will be able to serve their country in a time of
Up to 750 women were estimated to be enlisted and fought in every major battle of the war. These brave women were motivated by adventure, promising pay, and loyalty to their cause. This, combined with that fact that they knew they had the power to help, drove many American women to conceal their gender and participate in the military (Smith 3 - 4). “I could only thank God that I was free and could go forward and work, and I was not obliged to stay at home and weep" (Smith 4). Although this seems like it would be difficult to do, meager training requirements, sanitary customs, and bulky uniforms at the time made it much simpler to keep these women 's identities a secret.
People think of women as being hurt, and being took down by other people. In combat all you do is focus on strength. If your a women you always have the fear of not being strong enough up against someone else. But in combat that 's one thing that the commanders focus on. Strength matters, to your commanders, partners, and to your army.
Many women have proven themselves in the military for example, General Ann E. Dunwoody, the first woman
Yet, women were expected to set aside their personal beliefs to insure that America could still make further advancements without its men. However, women still complied because they knew the responsibility laid with them to keep the nation running. Still, much of propaganda had a purpose to motivate women to lend a helping hand in the war. As Susan Mathis said, “The patriotic appeal had two aspects… ‘do your part’... ‘a soldier may die if you don’t do your part’...”
In the book written by (Gavin, 1997) it was cited that “As women took over from their absent men in hundreds of new and challenging occupations, many of which had previously been considered inappropriate”. From the beginning of the World War 1, the German women were participating a great deal. They contributed to half a million-people working on the munitions manufacturing alone (Gavin, 1997). It also mentioned in the book that over in the U.S, the men in charge refused to let the women participate up until April 1917 (Gavin, 1997). The U.S government never formally authorize the enrolment of women, despite Army officials repeatedly asking for such personnel’s.
Men and women are both given opportunities to join the army, but with the understanding that different roles require different physical, emotional attributes. This should mean in turn that there are multiple routes to promotion so that women have equal opportunities without having to fight take part in combat operations . As long as an applicant is qualified for a position, one’s gender is arbitrary. It is easy to recruit and deploy women who are in better shape than many men sent into combat. It is possible to calibrate recruitment and training standards to women.
Women have proven themselves as being competent and qualified for tasks and jobs in the military even under stressful or dangerous conditions. Men are allowed to choose combat and women should also be given this choice. Society will not suffer because not all women desire to fight in war-like conditions or deployments. Recently, there are numerous women who serve as Generals and Admirals. They consist of all components of the forces including serving in combat units and onboard ships.