Women's Rights Vs Sojourner Truth

730 Words3 Pages
The events of history impact our daily lives in a dramatic way. As a result of the people who stood out and fought for our rights, society is able to voice its opinion and live freely. For example, Sojourner Truth fought for women’s rights and wanted society to look at individuals for who they were, not what their gender was. The minds of many were changed by these powerful advocates and our lives are affected by their actions. Sojourner Truth was a very powerful and independent woman of her time. She got others to join her in the movement for women 's rights. Also, she wanted to prove to the world that women were equal and deserved the same rights as men. “...but men doing no more, got twice as much pay…” (Truth). She was tired of men believing…show more content…
Violence did not need to be performed for the advocate to get their point across. Ghandi states “No country has ever become, or will ever become, happy through the victory in war. A nation does not rise that way, it only falls further.” (Gandhi 377). He simply wants his followers to know that war does not bring happiness. We do not need to get involved in violence to prove point. Gandhi pointed out that a nation does not rise because of war, it rises because of its people. People who voice their opinion and protest, but in a peaceful manner. Truth also went about her campaign with women’s rights in a peaceful way. “...I see women contending’ for their rights…” (Truth 254). She noticed women trying incredibly hard to gain their rights. Women wanted to be viewed as equals and felt they were no different than men. Truth was successful in her speeches because it gave women to power to speak up and push for their right to vote. If she never advocated for these women, society today may be very different. Reagan united the people of Berlin and the world simply be giving a speech. “Yes, across Europe, this wall will fall, for it cannot withstand faith; it cannot withstand truth. The wall cannot withstand freedom.” (Reagan 6) Thoreau may have been angry but still went about his opinions in a civil way. “Duty to Submission to Civil Government.”
Open Document