1.1 Background of the Study Every language has its own idiomatic expression in the form of words, phrases, and expression which has a purpose to express the meaning through the lexical item. Idiom is a group of words whose meaning is different from the meaning of the individual words, for example: ‘Let the cat out of the bag’ is an idiom which means to tell a secret by mistake (Hornby, 2010:744). Every idiom is commonly difficult to understand because it has special meaning and also it cannot be translated literally. In understanding the meaning of idiomatic expression, we should also learn the other cultures to get the meaning of what idiom that the culture used. According to Goffin and McMordie (1976:6), idiomatic expression are to be
One limitation of COMINT is that communication has to exist in order to be intercepted. Without communications, the COMINT operation is worthless. Information can also be encoded, which will pose a problem in analysis. One limitation of using COMINT is that there is too much information. Communication intelligence yields a lot of information for intelligence analysts.
Intercultural communication transpires when a person from one culture intends to deliver a message to a person from another culture. Contrastingly, intercultural miscommunication happens when the sender's intended message is not successfully delivered to the individual from the second culture. Misperception, misinterpretation, and misevaluation are often one of the main reasons that cause cross-cultural misunderstandings and complications. Therefore, studies and theories on cross-cultural communication provide a base to exploration in the field of intercultural sensitivity. As stated by Lustig & Koester (1999, pg.60.
However, since the senses are susceptible to personal interpretation, they are therefore potentially unreliable sources of data. If one is able of rationally thinking through the information that they perceive, then they are more likely to make accurate assumptions. However, if one is highly emotive, they may not be able to separate the emotion from the data they perceive,
Analyses may be criticised for conveying a false sense of accuracy by including quantified values for non-monetary effects such as the value of forecast savings in human lives. Such values are often controversial and may diminish the authority of the analysis as a whole. On the other hand, analyses may be criticised for excluding intangible effects. Downs and Larkey (1988) state
Paradoxes of hasty generalization appear while a popular dedication is crafted from a one-sided or too little of a specimen. It is important to take into account in order not to make hasty generalizations as these can also result in out of line and erroneous options and generalizations, (Jungwirth 51). Misrepresentations of hasty generalization are noteworthy to fundamental wondering in that suppositions have to be stayed away from. In fundamental considering, suppositions can frequently manifest in mild of 1-sided or insufficient records. It is imperative to recognize about mistakes of hasty generalization when deciding, the realization ought to be remembered along take a look at length and tendencies if the size is simply too little or one-sided, it is not becoming to make generalizations given
RMT can explain the indígenas movement's emergence stage, especially the legitimacy and alliance resources. For money, labour and facilitates, more details are needed. For POS, in spite of possible distortion by author's division, it supports growth of indígenas movements. For framing, except diagnostic framing, prognostic and motivational framings are influenced by lack of details. However, framing analysis did provide more detailed strategies of how indígenas movement
Though as per the Judgment the right cannot be exercised when it is a particular issue is of public interest , there are serious loopholes in the Judgment which makes it difficult to guard essential public interest. The judgment entirely fails to deals with crucial questions where there is need to decide what would be the basis for deciding whether particular information is in public interest or not? Who is to be held accountable if the information regarding public interest is indeed removed? Upon whom does the burden of proof lies when it comes to deciding public
Similarly word summarization is also just like a text summarization in which we will give the text as a paragraph and from that text we can find the word summary using Word Sense Disambiguation technique. 1.3 Word sense disambiguation Word Sense Disambiguation is a challenging technique in Natural Language Processing. There are some words in the natural languages which can cause ambiguity about the sense of the word. Those words are called polysemous words. Word sense disambiguation (WSD) is the solution to the problem.
These assessments are often poor. Alternatives put forward tend to be unrealistic in order to favour the option the applicant wants to implement. The regulations also require the applicant to illustrate the need and desirability of the project, which is often not done (Hutton and Tefford, 2003). Impact mitigation Insufficient information provided on recommended mitigation measures; little indication of the practicality, reliability and potential effectiveness of the mitigation measures and problems with measures which are recommended that don’t address identified impacts. Unexpected impact Follow-up sometimes reveals unexpected impacts related to a project.