Over the course of the quarter we observed and analyzed Ashley, Kaylee, Kendra, and Tam’s group. These four individuals are a work team because their actions were coordinated, they specified specific roles, and had clear objectives and goals (Spector, 2017, p. 281). We have observed their group twice and analyzed five sets of observation field notes in order to determine their group cohesion, communication, and leadership. In addition, we have monitored their virtual work through a shared Google Document in order to better understand how much work each member actually put into the project. Lastly, we sent an electronic survey to all members of the group to receive direct feedback about how well they perceived their own interactions. We have …show more content…
Results from our survey also indicate that the team members were quite understanding of one another’s schedules and able to appropriately hold each other responsible for whichever section of work they were assigned. Leadership likely plays a role in the ability of this team to get along so well because Ashley took on a leadership role that was participative and engaging with all the other team members; making it easier for members to take on tasks. Another strength of this work team was that they were able to evenly divide their workload. Looking at their Google Docs to gain better insight, we saw that each member had an assigned section for which they completed, and that every member indeed contributed throughout the process. This is reflected in the survey that we administered to the group as well, as their responses explained that they felt, “All group members put in the same amount of effort” and “all group members equally contributed.” Lastly, a strength of this team was their ability to communicate and make decisions by means of discussion. Survey results indicated that 100% of decisions were made through discussion, which can help provoke new ideas and be beneficial to the development of a project. Had the team relied on decisions to be made by the facilitator or collectively, then the product may have been limited in its range of
Team building can be pursued through a variety of activities, ranging from the simple and basic, such as one off bonding exercises before or during meetings, to complex, multi-day simulations, trainings or retreats carefully organised by professional associations or companies specialising in such programmes. These latter full scale team building exercises or less intensive variations thereof may include seminars, workshops or conferences. Many team build ideas fall somewhere within this range and can also include an internally planned day out doing active outdoor pursuits such as paintball, rope courses or orienteering. Team building can also be achieved through healthy competition, such as baseball or soccer games organised against other companies or organisations; or through events such as community service projects, held for good socially worthy causes. Teambuilding is now widely recognised and accepted as being a significant and workable variable in many, if not most, group environments where performance is dependent on how well the group unit works together.
All teams that begin to be built are move through a series of stages, beginning when they are formed and ending when they are disbanded. Four distinct phases of team development are identified by Bruce Tuckman: forming, storming, norming, and performing, and each of those has a primary purpose and also a common set of interpersonal dynamics among team members. For a successful team evolution Tuckman proposed that all of those are inevitable and even necessary parts.
Teams can create solutions to problems in shorter time than individuals can do on their own. A team’s ability to see the solution through its implementation with collaboration is critical for success. This increases quality of a product to negate problems as they occur (Kokemuller, 2010). Communication between team members increase allowing more understanding and ideas to emerge. Relationships are built giving team members a sense of purpose and the ability to communicate more freely.
Traditional teams, also known as conventional or co-located or collocated teams, consist of individuals working in physical proximity, while the virtual teams (as previously defined) refers to a group of individuals who are separated by physical distance but are united by a shared goal. Though both traditional and virtual teams go through the five stages of Bruce Tuckman’s model of team development but the dynamics experienced by the members of virtual teams are more complex. This is largely due to the fact that members of virtual team rely solely on electronic communication and collaboration technology to facilitate interactions among them. Also the cultural boundaries and time zones differences add to its complex
Collaborative Working Collaborative working as partnership between community or voluntary organisations. An organisation may work with one other partner organisation or may belong to a wider consortium. “Collaborative working describes joint working by two or more organisations in order to better fulfil their purposes, while remaining as separate organisations” (CollaborationNI). Organisations can work together in a spectrum of ways from informal networks to joint delivery of projects. In light of the case study, Brathay Trust work collaboratively to deliver the P.A.Y.E.S programme to the vulnerable young people in the care home with various implemented activities.
Through my participation in numerous events I have been able to show my concern for my community members, and community. After high school I volunteered as a researcher at the DuPage County Historical Society during the summer of 2014. For my community I dedicated my free time looking up questions and interests of the citizens. After countless hours of research, I wrote up thorough answers to the citizen’s questions.
I believe we worked well as a group even though we were not working directly with each other. This helped me understand as to how a group effort can involve more than one set of people. While we were Luckyday volunteers they included us into their group of everyday workers. The work was completed by the entire team. Not one person received more credit that the other.
Collette O’Connell Writing and rhetoric 1 Collaborative manifesto reflection I will be the very first to admit that I absolutely despise group work. This is because I’m introverted and very stubborn, and together thise two qualities makes me extremely difficult to work with. I have a hard time listening to other people’s intentions when it comes to projects which often creates an unpleasant atmosphere. I also don’t compromise easily and often when I don’t get my way back out of a project or put forth as little effort as possible. It is for these reasons that group work has never really been something I enjoyed doing.
One of the most popular models of managing team development would be Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development. Tuckman’s model is significant because it recognises the fact that groups do not start off fully-formed and functioning. He suggests that teams grow through clearly defined stages, from their creation as groups of individuals, to cohesive, task-focused teams. Tuckman reviewed 50 articles on group development and noticed that there were two features common to these small groups: the interpersonal or group structure, and the task activity. From this he identified that groups evolved into teams via four common stages.
Teams, however, are made up of individuals with varying levels of skill, education, and vast differences in personality and life experiences that make them individuals within the team environment. Therefore, “conflict in groups is nearly unavoidable when individuals with their own unique perspectives, work styles, and skills team up to create products or services. When conflict occurs and individuals are personally invested in the outcome of a project, conflict may elicit emotional reactions” (Griffith, Connelly, & Thiel, 2014, pg. 148).
Corey, I agree that a successful team is which a team doesn’t waste time trying to achieve success at the expense of other member. The team that are successful have these factors cohesiveness, effective communication, groupthink, homogeneity, role identity, stability and team size. A team highly cohesive, a member’s commitment and willingness to strive for excellence thrives. Effective communication is establish through mellow conversation tones, willingness to consider all opinions, desire to enhance communication frequency, effective conflict resolution, and efficient decision-making processes. Groupthink is a tendency for decision-making teams to suppress opposing viewpoints in order to preserve group focus on one or two solutions (Plowman,
In working with children, there are more barriers for workers in terms of responsibilities. The transition from working with adults and children is significant in where working with adults within the social services sector, you can only help them out so much because adult clients can make decisions for themselves. Whereas in working with minors, sole responsibility for youth becomes mine and my teams, and from such responsibility comes a lot of pressure. Pressure put on my team ranged from having to keep parents happy, by making sure the service we provided was an enjoyable experience for their children, as well as having to ensure the safety of their children. Besides keeping parents and students happy, added pressure from this experience
VIRTUAL TEAMS “LEADERSHIP FOR VIRTUAL TEAMS AND AND STAGES OF TEAM DEVELOPMENT IN VIRTUAL TEAMS” 1. INTRODUCTION Leadership in the electronic age is surely different. Or is it? As the impressive and seemingly constant parade of developments in computer and communications technology continues to change our world, we ask what remains the same and what has changed. One tremendously important context for leadership is teams.
The workload among the group members was fairly equal, except for Sierra, who having had connectivity issues has only helped Chris by doing one of the quotes of the literary
Introduction There are advantages and various challenges associated to process of doing the working dealings with others in technology mediate business environment reference with UPS store. By make use of college e-library three articles which be capable of give explanation the different techniques which be competent for adopting and used in favor of group work.. In Oman Air the experiences and uses associated to Peer relationship as strategy purposeful in favor of learning in workplace can be explained , throughout adopting an interviewing with five workers working in Oman Air to gain information for them about Peer relationship as strategy purposeful in favor of learning in workplace . 1. There are advantages and some