The choice is yours. Work or children. A combination of the two can only result in one being neglected, and with working mothers, it tends to be the latter. A mother who spends her day at home is fulfilling a woman’s role in life, and has many positive effects on her children. Under some circumstances a mother can work part time on condition that this does not interfere with her children.
In recent years, the rate of maternal employment has increased significantly. This social change is the outcome of a sequence of other minor changes in family life. “Family size is smaller, modern technology has considerably diminished the amount of necessary housework and food preparation, women are more educated, marriages are less stable, life expectancy
…show more content…
It is now acceptable for a mother to leave her infants at home with a nanny or at a daycare, and to have a housekeeper cook dinner, do laundry, and attend to all other household chores. Today’s society pushes a woman to be like a man, trying to hide the differences between the two. All this is an outcome of the fact that woman do not believe in their unique role as mothers of the next generation. Much emphasis is put on getting women to go out and work, thus diminishing the existing gender-role differences, but while encouraging mothers to get a career, the long-term effects on their husbands and children are being overlooked due to political and economic agendas (Bingham, 2013).
Studies conducted regarding the impact of having a stay-at-home mother show evidence of many resulting benefits. Mothers provide inimitable advantages to their children, which others, including fathers, cannot (Bingham, 2013). A mother who stays at home creates a stable and consistent environment for her children. Not being required to change between childcare centers, or even between different caregivers in one same setting, which can be unsettling to young children, ensures a sense of stability in a child’s life (Hatter, N.D.). Besides, it is difficult to argue with the power of a mother’s
…show more content…
The reason that this feeling is sometimes lacking in stay-at-home mothers is because they do not grasp their nobility in choosing to stay at home for their children. They tend to believe what society claims, that staying at home is a negative thing, and that mothers who at stay home are less happy, more depressed, and “they have taken a step down both socially and intellectually (Bingham, 2013)." Although these women are personal witnesses to the fact that by staying at home their children are better off, their family is in a better situation, and they themselves are happier and less stressed, they refuse to believe that they made the right decision being that some studies show otherwise (Heffernan, 2013). These studies say that a mother who works has a higher sense of satisfaction and morale (Hoffman, N.D.). It is definitely “easy to be conflicted in a society that is so conflicted (Heffernan, 2013)," but a mother who is content with her choice to stay at home and realizes what she is giving her children by doing so, can reach the same level of self-worth as one who
Goodman supports her assertions through a character from the television series, ‘Desperate Housewives’, whom Goodman claims reveals the realities of being a full-time mother. Goodman’s purpose of the article is to remind readers of the typical mother’s thoughts and occasional emotions in order to reassure mothers who are contemplating whether they made the right decision to give up their careers to solely care for their children and households. The author establishes both an informal and relatable relationship with her audience of mothers who are in need of
“Mothers whose children spend more time in nonmaternal care are likely to exhibit lower levels of sensitivity and less positive mother–child interactions, regardless of the quality and stability of the child care” (Erickson). This proves that if a mother stay home with their child they are generally more happy and have a stable relationship with their parents, specifically their
It is bizarre that only 50 years ago a woman's sole purpose and responsibility was to care for her children and tend to the needs of the home. In the early 1960's, to think a woman could contribute to society in the same way men could was a ludicrous idea. It was unorthodox for women to receive an education. Imagining women holding high positions in society while still managing to take care of the motherhood duties was inconceivable. Today, many women are relied on for holding some of the most successful job positions in the country.
Women that have had a child and decide to rejoin the workforce are often facing a dramatic decrease in pay, with some women losing anywhere from 18 percent to 41 percent (Nelson, 138). Nelson tells the story of one woman, which had previously been the breadwinner of her family, up until she had a baby. She would have preferred to stay at home with her newborn, but her family needed the money. After rejoining her law firm, her hours were no longer flexible, and she was forced to stay until 11
So you see a lot of single women trying to provide the best that they can for their little ones and it’s a sad thing to see. But, if you are married, you as a woman must stay at home and be that “housewife” type of woman. For me, that doesn’t shock me, but because I was born and raised in the United States, I can’t just simply cook and clean because I want a future that involves a career.
Women’s work in the home was undervalued, and as women began to work outside the home, they were expected to provide and care for the family (Eto, 2001). The exploitation of women as workers diminished as they protested,
Furthermore, the domestic job of raising children is one of the most labor-intensive jobs assigned only to women. This task was one of the most beneficial jobs women had within the home, mothers are teaching children social standards and raising the next generation. The way a mother raises a child lays the foundation for how they will behave in the community as
Women’s success in the labour force ultimately showed that the ideal of a family in which the mother stayed at home to look after the children while
Women and the battle to maintain a work-lifestyle balance has been consistently debated and toyed with by society for ages. Anne-Marie Slaughter, Professor of Politics and author of “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All” explains the continuous hardship of balancing a career and a family; as well, Stephen Marche, writer and author of “Home Economics: The Link Between Work-Life and Income Equality” combats Slaughter’s article and the many gaps present in society. Slaughter and Marche compare and contrast the differences of the leadership gap between men and women, the strategies of maintaining a work-balance lifestyle in regards to family, and the type of dialogue representing men in articles written by women. Anne-Marie Slaughter and Stephen
There’s no typical family as nuclear families as in the past and not everyone lives in a multigenerational household. Same-sex families are also on the rise as sexual ambiguity is undergoing its own wave of acceptance in all political, social, and economic spheres. With the absence of the parents’ presence in the home due to an inability effectively balance work and home life, children could develop an emotional void/absence. Good communicative dialogue between children and their parents where the adults describe their work situation as it relates to the home to create resilient children, could possibly benefit the household.
Australia has been widely considered as a “lucky country” due to its egalitarian view whereby equality is pertinent among different individuals of different social class, gender and race. Based on the egalitarian view, social mobility should be obtainable to all Australians. However, is it really true that all Australians are equal and that social mobility is obtainable for all? Social mobility refers to the ability for people to change social classes. According to Carl et al.
During the 1950s both marriage and birthrates were booming. Woman were getting married at such a young age, which led them into giving birth and starting families at a much younger age than the average woman today. Since a woman’s first priority was considered to be her family, many of them never got the education they wanted or reached their specific career goals. A job barely even crossed their mind and some could not even fathom the idea. They were seen as having such a “full plate” dealing with the household chores and family, that no one thought they could have any time to spare doing anything else.
Some blame oppressive societal gender roles for urging women to be the caretakers of the home, but the reality is that women are less likely to devote the majority of their lives to their careers -- leading to fewer overall wage earnings.” (P. 1). These factors such as being caretakers at home are reasons why when wage gap is calculated it is seen that women are earning less than men but as explained because some women do not devote themselves to
There are many examples on how gender roles have changed in society dramatically. However, one might imply that women working has a toll on the children at home. According to Source 2, on the bar graphs, 74% of people agree that having a job makes it harder to raise children since their mom is going to be busy most of the time. Regardless, this argument is not correct to make due to the fact that moms are working to provide for
Today motherhood is divided between the working and stay at home moms, and which group is “the better