4 Applying the narrative concept on the World Heritage site
4.1 Interdepencency between identity and heritage
As Smith (2006:48) claims, “the association between heritage and identity is well established in the heritage literature“. In this context, heritage seems to be regarded as “material culture“ that is linked to the fugacious conception of “identity“. Furthermore, Smith compares the conception of “identity“ to the notion of “history“. Both seem to create an awareness of social affiliation. This sense of social affiliation seems to arise a thought of shared commonalities within the mind of people who apparently see themselves as members of a particular community. But in comparison to the notion of “history“, the conception of “identity“
…show more content…
This is mainly due to the fact that the view of something as heritage seems to depend on the people. In this regard, a particular community appears to associate something as their heritage, but in the next few years this view can change. Therefore, heritage should be regarded as “heritages“. Similar to that, the assumption regards, “pasts“ and “identities“. Furthermore, not only the view of the people towards heritage seem to change over an amount of time, but there seems to be also the assumption of a changed view of the conceptual notion of heritage in academia. Nowadays, scholars seem to regard the conception of heritage from a “constructionist perspective“. In this context, “selective past material artefacts, natural landscapes, mythologies, memories and traditions“ seem to be used as a “cultural, political [or] economic“ tool. Similar to the notion above of “identity“, this conception also implies the notion of heritage as “social construct“ that seems to be used as a means by authorities. Depending on what appears to be needed within a particular prevailing time, the view on something as heritage and of outstanding value appears to be “selected“. This seems to be due to the fact that it is not the objects themselves that people appear to regard as unique and valuable, but the attention people give to them. This in turn, appears to convert physical or immaterial objects in …show more content…
Furthermore, Graham and Howard argue that the perception of imaterial heritage seems to be of main importance and appears to even rank above the notion of material objects, due to the fact, that a variety of cases illustrate that within the mind of people the degree of importance seem to derive from “myths and legends“ around the sites. In this regard, it can be further argued, similar to what Korostelina (2014) claims, that imaterial heritage that seems to imply the notion of “myths“ within this context, appears to transmit, determine and construct the degree of importance and worth of a particular concrete object. Otherwise, this particular concrete object would be regarded as less, because of the lack of importance that a particular “myth“ seems to give an object to become
The article “whose culture is it?” written by Kwame Anthony Appiah published in 2012, contains factual and suggestive content towards the preservation and importance of historical antiquities. The author discusses the positioning of cultural antiquities based on the ability of civilizations to preserve them. As examples were revealed, various acts have been taken accordingly; to legally provide the antiquities the safest solutions to preserve them. Furthermore, Appiah also discusses that some artifacts that belong to the artist, or contributors should be considered as universal art. He also questions some of the decisions taken by UNESCO, if they were truly for the betterment of the antiquities.
In “Are ethnographies ‘just so” stories?” by E. Paul Durrenberger, in this article he makes an argument about the form of culture being an artifact, and even science is a form of culture. He first points out the development of how culture came to term of being an artifact. Durrenberger says, “If we want to learn about a culture, we study its artifacts, especially the ones that say something about social relations and the culture itself” (60). This is significant because we can’t just have someone make up a story if they never studied or seen with their own two eyes to prove of what is real or not. The second point that he made is that science is a form of culture.
Without the heritage that they have, there would be no way to be able to tell these unique stories to future generations, in that way, cultural heritage makes up this whole
Identity speaks of who we are as individuals but it also comes from two different groups: social and cultural. These groups are connected to power, values and ideology. Social identities are related to how we interact with people and how we present ourselves. Meanwhile cultural identities relate to society in whole such as religion, values, etc. In this paper I will talk about the dominant and subordinate identities.
“The connection towards a certain culture is essential in the shaping of one’s identity.” Establishing a sense of identity is an intrinsic element of the human condition, dictated by an individual’s innate need to ascertain connections with [Answer Question]. However, its complex process can be attributed to its transitory nature, making it imperative The relationship between person and place is a significant element in shaping one’s identity. In Post Card, Peter Skrzynecki’s confusion about his connection to his homeland creates a fractured identity, having a major influence on his feeling of acceptance.
Starting at a young age my family had stressed the importance of embracing my Italian heritage. My father, mother and grandfather each contributed in showing me that in order to honor our Italian heritage you must demonstrate three qualities as a young man. My father is responsible for teaching me respect and how to give every individual you meet total and complete respect. Similarly my mother is responsible for teaching me love, how to love and how to spread love throughout the world. As for my grandfather, he taught me what courage is and how to always be courageous.
Cultural Identity for African Americans (Comparison and contrast between Hughes, Clifton and McElroy and their ideas of cultural identity.) People have different ideas as to what it means to be of another race. Many individuals believe that race should have no affect on their lives today. People who have the same qualifications shouldn't be persecuted because of their skin color.
Introduction Social identification is a very important source of both one’s pride and self-esteem. Because groups give us a sense of social identity and belongingness to the social world, intergroup relations have a huge impact on the actions we engage ourselves in. “We are not born with senses of self. Rather, self arises from interaction with others” (Griffin, 2012). In this paper I will first give a summary of Tajfel and Turner’s Social Identity Theory.
How does a person value heritage and what type of impact does it hold on a family with a substantial history? Taking a glimpse beneath the surface of family relationships and views on traditional heritage, author Alice Walker showcases a true grasp on letting readers see into the compassionate lives of three strong female leads. With her short story “Everyday Use” each character relatable and described in such detail, the reader can truly sympathize and understand the impact heritage brings to a family. Walker’s compelling short story “Everyday Use” explores how complicated family dynamics can impact the attitude towards heritage through the three female leads. Family can occupy strong roots dating back generations with steadfast traditions that appreciate true meaning and personal endearment to family members.
Introduction The concept of identity has been a notion of significant interest not just to sociologists and psychologists, but also to individuals found in a social context of perpetually trying to define themselves. Often times, identities are given to individuals based on their social status within a certain community, after the assessment of predominant characteristics that said individual has. However, within the context of an ethnicity, the concept identity is most probably applied to all members of the ethnical group, and not just one individual. When there is one identity designated for the entire group, often times the factor of “individuality” loses its significance, especially when referring to the relationship between the ethnic
Each individual has their own different social identity. One’s social identity is constructed based on the different influences around them. The development of social identity is influenced by various factors such as the historical, cultural and religious beliefs of the society, community or family where one is brought up. It is influenced by the behaviours and attitudes of authority figures such as parents, teachers and community leaders around them, it is also influenced by external factors such as the media, one’s peers and the overall exposure one has (Carrim, 2006, p56).
Throughout my experiences in this course so far, I have had many opportunities to reflect on my own past and have begun to better understand my own cultural identity. It has been much more difficult to wrap my head around than I would have predicted it to be because so many things play into the construction of an identity that it can be hard to look at all of those separate pieces together. My cultural identity, like all others, is more complicated than it first appears. I identify as a white person, a woman, an American, a gay person, and a feminist, just to name a few. While all of these labels carry with them stereotypes and expectations, they also interplay with the cultural influences I was subject to throughout my childhood.
The two main texts to consider here are : Zygmunt Bauman’s “Identity in the globalizing world” and Stuart Hall’s “The question of cultural identity”. Both the authors deal with the identity discourse that has taken place with the advent of modernity or what can be thought of as how identity evolved in the modern times. Zygmunt Bauman’s article revolves around the thought that “we have moved from a
William Murtagh, first keeper of the National Register of Historic Places, once said “at its best, preservation engages the past in a conversation with the present over a mutual concern for the future.” Preservation has always been a part of human nature, deeply rooted in our tradition and moral code. There is a profuse amount of ways in which society preserves, some are for selfish reasons but others help us move forward and learn from our past. As the great human race, it can be said that preservation has been our main reason for being the most successful species on the planet. Sigmond Freud was an Austrian neurologist who stated that one of the “deepest essences of human nature” is that of self-preservation.
The rise of multiculturalism in nearly all societies across the globe has brought with it countless questions that are still unanswered. The problem of whether people from different cultures should have the right to express their cultural identity in a mixed society has been highly discussed for the last 10 years. There are two main trains of thought. On the one hand, those who believe that expressing cultural identity is a part of freedom of speech, and hence should never be taken away. On the other hand, there are those who argue that people must comply with the cultural norm of the country they are living in.