World War 2 Dbq Essay
World War II has been going on for 10 years and for the war to be over Japan or the Allied Powers would have to surrender. The United States and the Soviet Union were super powers with tension that stayed beneath the surface for the duration of the war. The two were in a race to invent and use the first atomic war head. After ten years of war the conditions of Japan were poor and not likely to withstand much more conflict. Yet on December 7, 1941 the Japanese bombed an American naval base in Hawaii. After the bombing, President Truman declared war on Japan and bombed two cities in Japan in 1945. President Truman wanted to end the war with Japan; however, he wanted to show the power of the US, destroy the Japanese while they were weak, and …show more content…
The strategy of the war was to destroy the Japanese military by any means necessary. The total manpower of the US was more than the Japanese so bombing was not the only option. There was a costlier yet more humane way to do this that was not reliant on the atomic bomb. On the down side millions of lives just on the American side would be lost. Also, the longer the fighting the more likely communism was to spread and then the task would be more to handle than the US felt they could alone. (doc A) The Manhattan Project tested the atomic bomb and it was successful for what America needed. A Russian scientist wrote the United States knew Japan was already unstable and the bombing was not a necessity. (doc F) The raids, air strikes, land mines, and regular bombs from the Unites States had already depleted the resources of Japan. US raids on Japan caused about 241,000 deaths, 313,000 wounded people, and approximately 2,333,000 homes to be destroyed. No supplies could be brought in and few industries still stood to help. (Doc B) Therefore, Japan was on the verge of surrender and the bombing was not the most …show more content…
America and the Soviet Union were in a race and whoever created an atomic weapon and used it first was believed to be better than the other. He wanted to publicize his power and destroy the Japanese in the process. The strategy of the war was to destroy the Japanese military by any means necessary, but the total manpower of the US was greater than the Japanese so bombing was not the only option. Truman wanted handle the Russia situation in a way that displayed the US as a dominant entity. This means the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were ploys of diplomatic intimidation rather than ending the war. Tweets between Kim Jong Un and President Trump are like the race to create the first atomic weapon. President Trump wants to intimidate the Un until he gives up like in a brinkmanship. President Trump and Kim Jong Un seem to be entering their countries into another cold war. Like Truman and Stalin in the end of WWII, underlying tension between the two have built up but has not
Why Did President Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb On Japan?
249 Words | 1 PagesHighly, debatable topic President Truman’s decision on dropping atomic bomb on Japan during World war II. Many questions arise when this topic is raised like the world was introduced to the nuclear bombs, it was racist to drop bombs in japan, was Truman’s main target Asian or was it for the political reestablishment between Soviet Union, as German was America’s first attack why he did not drop atom bomb on them and so on. As it has already become more than seventy years it is still amongst the debated ones. It was best decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan by President Truman considering different factors like ending the war as soon as possible, responding to the pearl harbor, to impress the Soviet, lack of having incentives not to use bomb and justify the cost of Manhattan project.
Was The Us Justified Dbq Essay
651 Words | 3 PagesHarry Truman gave many warnings before he put in place the dropping of the atomic bomb. He wrote a press release announcing the Atomic bombing of Hiroshima on August 6th,1945 defending using the atomic bomb. He stated that “japan began the war from the air at Pearl Harbor. They have been repaid manyfold, and the end is not yet (Doc 8)”. Truman was tired of his country suffering from this long World war he put
Was Truman Animal Testing Justified
443 Words | 2 PagesMoreover, after the first bomb was dropped in Hiroshima, the Prime Minister, Kintaro Suzuki announced to the Japanese Cabinet that they had no choice but to surrender (Blum 2). However, they would not have time to do so since the second atomic bomb was dropped that same day in Nagasaki. This leads me to question Truman’s real motivation behind his decision. Why would you drop a bomb on a country that was on the brink of surrender? Even more questionable, why would you drop a second without giving adequate time for a
The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
350 Words | 2 PagesTruman did not utilize his power well while faced with the decision to drop the bomb. This is because there were other ways to solve the problem, and it was savage and brutal. The relationship between Japan and America will never be the same. It was so inhumane to drop the bomb.
How Did The Us Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq
1248 Words | 5 PagesIf a nuclear bomb was dropped today, it would most certainly lead to a nuclear war killing many people. But, in 1945, two atomic bombs were dropped on Japan by the United States just to end World War Two. Or one thinks so. Another theory about the atomic bomb droppings claims that the United States dropped the bombs to intimidate the Soviet Union in the post-Second-World-War era. Ultimately, this claim can be seen as credible because the war in Japan was on the brink of ending, the U.S wanted to make the Russians manageable by showing are capability, and America did not want to make allies with the Soviets.
The Pros And Cons Of Making The Atomic Bomb
862 Words | 4 PagesThe American troops and civilians were all very tired from the ongoing 4 year war. There were troops occupying Okinawa and Iwo Jima, two cities in Japan. The Japanese army was refusing to surrender with the 2 million troops stationed in the homeland islands of the Japan. As much as Truman did not want to have to drop the two bombs, the Japanese left the United States no other choice. The allies even demanded an unconditional surrender.
Truman Justified To Drop The Atomic Bomb Analysis
1056 Words | 5 PagesTruman was strategically correct to drop the bomb because with the war going on for so long he no longer wanted to keep sending soldiers into battle to die with the war being close to over; and he probably saved the lives of thousands of soldiers from not invading Japan because the U.S. knows that Japanese men fight to the death and that surrendering is a sign of cowardness and they will be shamed at home by everyone. Truman’s plan worked strategically and well politically also. This is because as the war was going on in the PTO the U.S. was also fighting Russia in the Cold War, seeing who could be the best power and with Russia trying to expand communism, America was able to use the atomic bombs as a scare tactic and Truman bluffed saying that the military had more bombs standing by and ready to use if they keep trying to expand. This was able to hold off Russia expanding and show everyone that America is ready to take action if needed. On the other hand Truman wasn’t so justified morally.
Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay
918 Words | 4 PagesJFK once said, " Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind." In 1939 Albert Einstein had written the US president of the potential to build a nuclear weapon. The US entrance into the war on December 7th of 1941 led to the president creating the Manhattan Project in 1942 where the atomic bomb was developed. On August 6th of 1945 US president Truman ordered the bombing of Hiroshima using the atomic bomb, 3 days later he ordered a second bomb to be dropped in Nagasaki. The US was justified in using the atomic bomb to end WWII because, America's technology was their greatest achievement, during the time of war death is inevitable, and Japan ignored all warnings given by America.
Was The Atomic Bombing Of Japan Necessary?
1480 Words | 6 PagesA quick surrender by Japan was needed in order for Russia to stop pushing forward through Asia (“THE AMERICAN YAWP”). However, if they had just waited then Japan would have surrendered before an Allied invasion and before Russia was settled in their new communist land. The U.S. didn’t want to show a dependency on Russia either and they wanted to seem strong enough to not need their help, but in reality, the Soviet Union was pivotal in victory in Europe and in the Pacific. By dropping the atomic bombs on a population that Americans believed at the time was racially inferior and a defenseless target, they could demonstrate to the Soviet Union and the rest of the world that the U.S. was simply better than everyone else.
Ww2 Persuasive Essay
813 Words | 4 PagesI believe that Truman was looking more at the future of the country as an historian Edward explains,“ Truman had much more to think about than the immedicate human cost. He had to look to the long term”(world book advanced). It shows that economically United States could have still won war with Japan, but the cost of soldiers, and more expenses such as weapons and transportion could do much more damage to our country. Many historians believe that Truman’s plan was the good for our country as one of them announced, “Truman and his advisters made the only decision they could have made, indeed, consider in the context of World War Two, it wasn’t really much of a decision at all,”(national Interest). The bombing on Japan was a huge victory for the United States, but due to many other battles, the decision to drop the bomb was the best decision for the many countries as it made peace.
Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay
852 Words | 4 PagesIn the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.
World War II DBQ Essay
889 Words | 4 PagesHitler was the main aggressor during 1939 who everyone appeased to, who is infamously known for his rise to power, his persecution of Jews, and his attacks on the world to dominate, that killed so many. Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister, believed in the policy of appeasement and appeased Hitler at the Munich Conference which eventually lead to the start of World War II. The Western Powers responded to aggression with appeasement, and in 1939 the world was plunged into World War II, proving to the world that collective security is a better response to aggression. Hitler’s aggression was the main reason why Allied powers felt the need to appease. In 1930, after the Reichstag fire, Adolf Hitler rose to power because he was appointed
Who Dropped The Atomic Bomb Essay
1269 Words | 6 PagesHow did President Truman come to the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan as a means to end World War 2? President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb on japan to save people from agony and pain. Even though the two bomb killed more than 200,000 Japanese civilians, it saved American soldiers. For this reason, President Truman thought that dropping these bombs was for the greater good. How did the atomic bomb become a factor to end World War 2?
The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb
933 Words | 4 PagesBy being the first ones to create and use atomic bombs, the U.S. was placed in an area of great power. They had control over a devastating power that could entice the Soviet Union to tread lightly as sort of a failsafe for the United States. The Japanese were known as a nation that never gave up though. The article, Choices, Truman, Hirohito, and the Atomic Bomb, additionally declares, “... members of the Japanese government and military leadership strongly opposed surrendering. They argued that Japan should accept ‘the honorable death of a hundred million’ rather than give up.
Should America Use Atomic Bombs Against Japan?
800 Words | 4 PagesThe United States´ President Harry S. Truman authorized the launch of the atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, ending with the life of almost 214.000 people, civilians mostly. However, it is analyzed the necessity of those actions starting of the hypothesis of what was right; therefore, a questionable point of view emerges. USA should not have launched atomic bombs because they caused an unnecessary damage, dead people, damage to the environment and diseases to the citizens.
More about World War 2 Dbq Essay
Why Did President Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb On Japan?
249 Words | 1 PagesWas The Us Justified Dbq Essay
651 Words | 3 PagesWas Truman Animal Testing Justified
443 Words | 2 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
350 Words | 2 PagesHow Did The Us Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq
1248 Words | 5 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Making The Atomic Bomb
862 Words | 4 PagesTruman Justified To Drop The Atomic Bomb Analysis
1056 Words | 5 PagesAtomic Bomb Dbq Essay
918 Words | 4 PagesWas The Atomic Bombing Of Japan Necessary?
1480 Words | 6 PagesWw2 Persuasive Essay
813 Words | 4 PagesShould We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay
852 Words | 4 PagesWorld War II DBQ Essay
889 Words | 4 PagesWho Dropped The Atomic Bomb Essay
1269 Words | 6 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb
933 Words | 4 PagesShould America Use Atomic Bombs Against Japan?
800 Words | 4 Pages