This excerpt from the Greek author, Xenophon's proposal to the Athenian government, titled Revenues, offers us great insight into the historical period and society in which he lived. Written in the fourth century B.C.E., Xenophon describes a time when the Athenian silver mine owners were in need of labour assistance, which he believed could be fixed with the Athenian government's acquiring of slaves for lease. Xenophon proposed this idea that would be a "win-win" situation for the Athenian government and the silver mine owners, because the government would obtain revenue by leasing the slaves and the silver mine owners would obtain more silver and gain more profit with the help of the slave labourers, since the value of the silver would not …show more content…
We can distinctly understand, through Xenophon's writing, that they are connected because as he discusses, slaves were assets to whoever owned them since they were in high demand, especially in the silver mines. Therefore, as he argued, the Athenian government's leasing of slaves would directly benefit their economy's growth and prosperity. Since the Greek economy was in need of a boost, expanding Greek slavery seemed to be their best bet, especially in terms of increasing "... the economic benefit of its silver mines." This observation is justified by Xenophon's entire proposal, since his main goal was to help "...reform the state finances of Athens" by persuading the Athenian government to "...increase its income by buying a large number of slaves, who would then be leased out at a set amount per slave to private subcontractors working the mines." It is important to note that although Xenophon encourages slavery, as well as the branding of slaves, he does refer to them in his proposal as "...the men...", stress their "...strength...", and explain the important role they could play in strengthening his society's economy. This tells us that slaves weren't viewed so much as objects in the Greek society at this time in history, and may even have been valued and respected in some ways by its
Without trade partners because of their currency, and by condemning new ideas that could advance them as a society, we can see a militarized camp with a sluggish and practically useless economy that is slowly digging its own grave. In Athens, the economic reforms brought on by Solon bolstered the economy, raising the purchasing power of money, encouraging sustainable economic growth. Going even further, he held the view that “if the freedom of each is the concern of all, then the polis must protect everyone against personal enslavement, even to the extent of ransoming (…) Athenians who had already spent many years as slaves in other lands” (Vlastos, 1946).
Zareef Peeroo Tim Bailey October 15, 2014 Athenians vs. Spartans The differences between government, the role of women, and the education status of Athens and Sparta led to similar yet very different societies residing in the same area; therefor I will deconstruct these issues using an analytical comparative framework. In, Athens and Sparta, it shows all the differences between the Athenians and the Spartans. Although the two City States shared a common heritage, their differences grew so large in their own minds that they were ultimately willing to engage in a life-and-death struggle to support their separate realities (Spielvogel).
Athenians Democracy Ancient Athens has two documents that discuss democracy. The first one is “Document A: Pericles” and the other one is “Document B: The The Athenian Constitution”. In document A, I found that is truly democratic because your social class is not allowed the interfere with someone 's merit. For example, if you’re poor you’re still able to serve the state or be part of the government. In document A it also states that “you get equal justice.”
Themistocles decided to convince the Athenians to use the money from the silver vein to build Triremes, which
First of all, the economy was very strong in Athens. Athens is located in the gulf, and the transportation was very convenient, so development in industry and commerce increased rapidly. What’s more, Democracy was rising in Athens.
This proves that Rome managed their slaves harshly because they thought of their slaves as a tool. They treated them in such an inhumane manner. Slaves had no personal rights, and were considered “property” of their masters. Where they could be bought and sold, as well as part of the trade cycle. Slaves in Athens were treated a lot better compared to slaves in Rome.
Democracy, a form of government, allows the people in their own nationality to vote for people in order for them to become representatives as a result to vote on new laws that would affect their own nationality. One of the many states of Greece, ancient Athens was indeed not truly democratic as a result of not inclusive, other than male citizens, to gain authority in ancient Athens, ¨Demokratia was ruled by male citizens only, excluding women, free foreigners(Metics) and slaves.¨(Document D), therefore ruling Athens was only accessible to male citizen since since women, free foreigners(Metics), and slaves were not allowed to rule as a result of not being male citizens. One of the many states of Greece, ancient Athens, was indeed not truly democratic as a result of not even using the essentials of democracy that is used today, “Thus, by our standards, it was oligarchy, not democracy.¨(Document D), therefore ancient Athens was not using democracy as their form of government, they were using oligarchy,another form of government in which a small group of people has power and control, as their form of government instead of democracy.
BPQ #2- Almost all civilizations had some form of slavery, yet the slavery in the Greco-Roman civilization was much more prominent than in India or China. This is largely thought to have occurred
The Athenian and the Spartan civilizations were very unique and different but the people shared many similar ideas. The Athenians believed that their government was original and that everyone should participate directly in government. On the other hand, the Spartans believed that every man should train for the military. Both the Spartans and Athenians believed in an equal society where the members were devoted to the polis. During this time, Athens supported a democracy.
Unlike the Romans, Athenians had a strict but fair schedule that allowed them to enjoy citizenship equally. Equally, hard workers have brought Athens power just as much as hereditary leaders. According to Document B all citizens should be allowed to speak their opinion and have a share in election because of the hard work they do to make the city powerful. Athenians allowed poor and common men to win a position in government which was a transition from the wealthy having power to everyone having power.
Slaves that worked here were criminals who had to relinquish their property and their freedom. These people were stuck in the mines for the rest of their lives, never to be sold, and never to be granted back their freedom. They were condemned to slavery and it was understood that they would live and die in these mines. This poor excuse for a life often resulted in unimaginable suffering, and a very limited lifespan. Gladiators were also slaves that were trained to fight to the death for entertainment in the Roman amphitheaters.
According to Socrates perspective, the democracy of Athens was corrupt and even though they courts were made in such a way that everyone was judged fairly, it wasn’t such because there were no rules or principles set forth. When a person was brought to court in the Athenian court and the person spoke against the jurors or offended them, he or she could be prosecuted based on that. In summary, judgment was passed based on emotion rather than on justice. In the Apology, Socrates stated, “my present request seems a just one, for you to pay no attention to my manner of speech-
Firstly, the social system is patriarchal and women hold an inferior position in society. In book two, one of the suitors tells Telemachus how they forced his mother, Penelope, to finish weaving the burial shroud. Ancient Greek society had very specific gender roles, expecting men to be masculine and domineering while women were passive and obedient. Secondly, slaves serve family and the guests’ needs, for example the household’s slaves were used to entertain the suitors.
Not only does Aristotle have conflicting viewpoints regarding his beliefs on natural slavery throughout the Politics, but when comparing his work Nicomachean Ethics to book I of the Politics several more inconsistencies arise. ‘Tyrannical to is the rule of a master over slaves; for it is the advantage of the master that is brought about in it’ (NE.7.10.1160b29-30). One of very few scholars who focuses attention to this inconsistency is Donald L. Ross. After stating the fact that Aristotle is clear this tyrannical forms acquire minimal justice he makes the comment, ‘this is a far cry from the confident conclusion of Politics I 5: it is clear…that some men are by nature free, and other slaves and that for these latter slavery is both advantageous and just’ (Ross 2008: 56). Aristotle is implying two contrasting views of slavery in these passages- one being slavery is just because both master and slaves are benefitting equally and the other stating that slavery is only just and advantageous for the
the idea of representative government began to take root in some city states, specifically Athens. Athenian reformers moved toward democracy, rule by the people. In Athens citizens participated directly in political decision making. However there were limitations on citizenship to ensure that only the most rational people were able to vote. Through the construction of democracy in Athens, equality of all citizens became greater, and the city would become the top democracy of all the democracies.