Yip’s article discusses how religious texts such as the bible and the Quran, become a basis for marginalizing the non-heterosexuals. As mentioned in the article, it is true that homosexuals are always looked at negatively in these religious scriptures, but does it give the right for religious authorities to suppress these people? This essay will discuss some of the main points of the article and will tackle the different critiques about homosexuals in the Quran and in the bible. In the beginning of the article, Yip talks about how in western society, homosexuality is still a big issue up to this date. A homosexual, even with religious faith, is something taboo inside the religious communities. For most of these people, they keep their sexuality hidden because of the of stigmatization, while some, denounce their faith in order to resolve any contradiction between their sexuality and religious faith. …show more content…
Both Christian and Islam scriptures talk about sexual morality and how homosexuality is something looked down upon. Because of these scriptures, their followers form a stigma towards the non-heterosexuals. Especially with Christians, whenever they are in argument regarding homosexuality, the use of “the bible says so” seems to be a common statement they use to try to justify any acts against their beliefs. It is clear how these scriptures becomes a big influence on how these religious followers think. In the Islam scriptures, they take what is written almost literally. In the article it is mentioned that each time a person reads the Quran, they have their own interpretation and that is why some followers of Islam scriptures take the actions from the Quran
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Equality and same-sex marriage is similar to that of The Crucible. The thought of a same-sex marriage happening within the holy walls of God, is a sin, in the eyes of the church. Many churches have banned the ceremony of gay/lesbian marriages. The churches that disallow same-sex marriages are Baptists, Methodist, Catholic and Presbyterian churches. This selective behaviour from those particular churches, have caused hysteria from supporters of equality, especially the LGBTQ+ community.
The works of Luke Roberts and Juan Davila give an insight into two extremely different cultural identities. This analysis outlines how, within their respective oeuvres, Roberts’ Pope Alice and Archangel (1) and Davilas’ Beauty and The Beast have dealt with the notion of ‘belonging’. Roberts is a gay contemporary Australian artist, raised in Alpha, Queensland. The artist utilises his alter egos, such as Her Divine Holiness Pope Alice, to acknowledge and parody his childhood isolation and Catholic heritage (O’Donnel, 1993).
The Muslims holy bible is called the Quran. In the Quran, there are very appealing messages to those on the outside. In one verse, it states that, “Whoever killed a human being… shall be deemed as having killed mankind; and… whoever saved a human life shall be deemed as having saved all mankind.” (Document B) To most people, this shows equality. The word that all humans are interconnected and you matter appeals to countless people.
Some religious conservatives feel that they have all this religion, they read the bible, but they still treat other human beings with different values and morals other than their own so horribly. Many people were raised in the church all of their childhood lives and teenage years. Their families and the church taught them the same thing through their religions that homosexuality was wrong. At one time in their lives they had the fear of homosexuals that they were
The hostility between homosexual individuals and supporters and strict, religious people illustrates a divide in the country consisting of different views; Both groups pressure, rationalize, and stereotype the other, but in the end one group is angry and the other is hurt, and no movement to evolve the situation exists. In the past and in modern-day, American homosexuals and heterosexuals get scrutinized and disgraced because of their opinions in groupthink and towards one another. One group stereotypes outsiders because what they believe is different from their opinion. The groupthink article defines stereotyping out-groups as when “people outside the group who criticize decisions and actions are viewed as “enemies” who do not know what
Many conservatives see anything other than being attracted to the opposite sex a sin because of arguable biblical textual aspects. Biblical references are interoperated in accordance to one’s individualistic ideas and cannot be used as concrete evidence in any situation. There are points to the popular consensus among conservatives that peoples of sexual orientation other than between man and women are not considered
We do this because our goal is that they would be born again. Sexual preference as both Preston Sprinkle and Dr. Albert Mohler point out do not define a person’s whole life. We would never define a heterosexual person by their sexual preference or by their sins. We shouldn’t do that to the homsexual community either. So we need to begin with a healthy respect towards others.
In the tradition of Islam, the existence of God is definitely based on the religion 's rational foundations. This includes the meaning, purpose, guidance, and comfort that the Islam provides to the lives of the Muslims. Thus, Quran serves as an inspiration for conviction of the inner life of all human beings. For many Muslims, experience and intuition work hand in hand, along with the logic that helps them in arriving at the Islamic faith.
Homosexuality is one aspect where Babas, Maulanas and Priests are united. Baba Ramdev famously quoted “Homosexuality is a disease and can be cured by yoga”. It’s quite ironic taking into consideration how Hindu mythology time and again depicted Gods changing their sex. Shiva bathes in Yamuna to become a Gopi to take part in Raas-Leela. Krishna transformed into Mohini to marry Aravan (Son of Arjun) in Mahabharata to fulfil his last wish.
They experienced this things because of homophobia or hatred of homosexuality. LGBT has many problems that they need to face. In some countries, being homosexual is a moral sin. There are many argument about sexuality and religion. And in some
Growing up, I attended small private Catholic schools in grades K through 12, so I never had a lot of exposure to gay culture. The Catholic church imparts somewhat of a stigma against homosexuality. Although this stigma is rooted in scripture, many Catholics believe that homosexuality is a sin and should not be accepted. Although I was raised in the Catholic faith, I don’t particularly agree with these morals and values set in place. My cultural relativism abled me to observe and not judge the culture I was surrounded by when I attended Christian’s party.
Some societies may even punish one for being homosexual because it violates their social norms. While gay rights have improved over the years and people are more accepting than they use to be, we still have countries like Saudi Arabia and other middle eastern countries along with Nigeria and a few other African countries that execute people for just loving someone of the
In 2009, The United Kingdom Hindu Council issued a statement that 'Hinduism does not condemn homosexuality ', subsequent to the decision of the Delhi High Court to legalise homosexuality in India. Probably, this is the only issue for which the priests, Babas & Maulanas from different faiths have been united and agree to raise one voice on this topic. Many of them have told on TV how homosexuality is against the "great Indian culture". But, if one takes a quick glance at the ancient Indian culture, mythology etc, this topic is not new.
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Community are a variety of people who belong in the diversified third sex. LGBT Tourism is a segment within the Tourism industry which aims to attract and market locations appealing to the LGBT community. The main objectives of LBGT tourism are; to promote travel services, accommodations and destinations that will fascinate LGBT tourist; propose LGBT-friendly attractions; offering destinations to individuals who wants to travel for socializing with other LGBT people and LGBT travelers who are predominantly focused with cultural and safety issues. What are the preferences of the LGBT Community in determining a tourist attraction? Are they in search for something more specific within the attraction?