1. how would you change your messages and/or behaviors to meet Aristotle’s three functions? In other words, how would you adapt your speech when informing, persuading, or commemorating?
Assume I give them a speech on developing a future career plan, The message of this speech needs to be altered when adopting different functions.
Firstly, the goal of inform is to present information rather than necessarily convince your audience. When I try to give the speech to my discussion group, I will focus on giving the collected information of some facts about the career plans and avoid some personal opinions in the speech. Since this is an informative function of rhetoric, the important thing I need to make is to tell my audience some information
…show more content…
First of all, I would use facts, examples, statistics to illustrate the importance of building a career plan is to meet the types of logic in Aristotle’s proof. As Professor Tusing mentioned in lecture 7, people should utilize all logic on their side to explain why they are right and make the audience believe (2017). By doing logical reasoning, it can eventually make my audiences have the same common view on speech.
Then, the emotion also needs to be highlighted. Tubbs pointed out that the face-to-face communication mainly relies on three sensory organs, which are hearing, sight and touch (Tubbs, 2014, 13). I need to convey both passionate words and nonverbal behaviors to my group. It would require me to utilize some postures, touches, variable voice tone, even controlling my pitch to meet the part of emotion.
Finally, since ethics emphasize on source credibility, I should pay attention to the accuracy and authority of information. I would use the reliable online library at school to support my speech. In addition, from the perspective of humanities, I also need to build a virtuous character to appeal my audiences when giving them an important speech.
3. what changes would you make (or not) to meet Bitzer’s three demands of a rhetorical
The book is full of speechwriting teachings for public speakers. In particular, it is based on the knowledge of the past such as Aristotle’s logos, pathos, and ethos concepts, and yet tailored for contemporary public speakers with a broad range of references to day-to-day persuasive instances (Heinrichs 231). Besides being highly informative, Jay Heinrichs’ book (Chapters 1 to 10) is also hilarious and dynamic. As earlier mentioned, the book covers the central rhetorical lessons of both Cicero and Aristotle. However, the author further cites fresh examples, centers on workplace, cultural, marketing and political references.
In order to make this speech applicable and persuade the audience that what he is saying is true, he implemented the rhetorical devices of anaphora, logos, and exaggeration.
The philosopher Aristotle, the master of rhetoric sat a fundamental elements and strategies to make the speech great. He said that rhetoric is based on three appeals; the first one logical appeal or "logos" which means the use of logic. This appeal uses evidence, reasoning, stablished facts, and statistics to construct a good argument and convince the audience. The second is emotional appeal or "pathos" which means the use of emotions, and imagination to invoke the audience’s feelings and influence them. Although this appeal is very effective, it sometimes can be tricky.
Rhetoric is the building block of all things said, written, or conveyed, people use it every day – look at any piece of written text whether it be from the last century or the modern day, you’ll find rhetoric featured in at least in one way, shape, or form. To properly understand this, it is useful to look back on popular pieces of media or speeches, for example, the legendary “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death”, a speech given by Patrick Henry on March 23rd, 1775 to form a volunteer cavalry to fight in the revolutionary war, which was effective in completing that task. Patrick Henry made his speech so effective through the use of his formal diction, ethics questioning pathos, and his use of ethos to express the exigency of forming the cavalry
Listening to what their audience wanted? All of the attributes that made these people successful in rhetoric are topics that are discussed and broken down in Thank You For Arguing. For these reasons, I agree with the continued usage of this book. This skill is one that could accompany students for the rest of their lives for the greater good, and make a difference in their future careers. People like being told what they need and the way it’s presented to
There are three main elements to rhetoric. Logos, which means logic, Ethos, the use of ethics or image, and Pathos, the use of emotion. “Persuasion is achieved by the speaker’s personal character when the speech is so spoken as to make us think him credible.” said Aristotle. (European Rhetoric)
What makes a speech effective? Using rhetoric, a person can appeal to others emotion and logic to persuade a person into doing a desired action. They can encourage a person into success or they can discourage a person into wanting to prove others wrong. The two speeches that will be discussed in this paper will be from Remember the Titans Gettysburg Speech and Glory Road Final game speech. The Gettysburg speech was made in the middle of movie.
In his landmark essay, "The Rhetorical Situation," rhetorical scholar Lloyd Bitzer laid out some of the basic components of the rhetorical situation. Bitzer views rhetoric as a action and not just hot air and fancy words. He defines rhetoric as “A mode of altering reality, not by the direct application of energy to objects, but by the creation of discourse which changes reality through the mediation of thought and action.” He sees rhetoric as a way to learn how to get things done. Rhetoric can be applied to practical things.
Jay Heinrichs beautifully transforms these approaches to rhetoric into a way that make sense today. From examples using celebrities, political powers, humor, and intellectual banter, Heinrichs truly encompasses the real art of persuasion in a way that complies with modern times, therefore proving the books continued use without a
Aristotle identified the three critical elements in good communication. The three rhetorical strategies are ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is your credibility. The reason people should belief what you say. Pathos is making an emotional connection.
In short, President Barack Obama gave a Commemoration Speech during his presidential campaign at Brown Chapel in Selma, Alabama on Selma Voting Rights March. His speech was powerful and he will go down as one of the greatest President to give speeches. Therefore, in this assignment I will discuss Aristotle’s three ways of persuasion. First, his speech was in a church and his audience was people who regularly attend churches and they usually have respect for their Pastors or guest Preachers because of their qualification. He used the first step of Aristotle three steps known as ethos which is determined through the character of the speaker (Excelsior College, n.d., para 2).
List and briefly describe Aristotle's three species of rhetoric. Aristotle’s three species of rhetoric are; Deliberative, Judicial, and Epideictic. Deliberative rhetoric, is based on the future, advising on events that will occur at a later date. Judicial rhetoric, is based on the past, and references debating in a court of law regarding accusations or defenses for actions or events done in the past. Epideictic rhetoric, is focused on the present, and it deals with giving either praise or blame.
Rhetoric is a way of speaking in a persuasive way to create an impact on the audience or have them think the same way as the speaker. The three main strategies of rhetoric speech is ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos meaning the speaker is dwelling upon themselves, pathos meaning the speaker is using imagination to create emotion, and logos meaning facts and logic is used by the speaker to persuade the audience. Socrates used logos in a way that helped him exhibit an effective speech to prove which type of knowledge is worth knowing. In spite of this claim, Socrates was truly only showing the court that he really did not know much more than his name.
His speech had ethos, logos, and pathos throughout it, which is why it was a great persuasive message. According to Aristotle’s three speech situations, this speech used
He begins by referring to various jobs, such as carpenters and tanners as having functions, and then uses eyes, feet, and other body parts as similar examples. It follows for Aristotle that mankind similarly has a function. Here, It should be remembered that Aristotle’s ‘function’ is something which is unique to its possessor. Next, Aristotle begins to narrow down what Man’s function is. He discards that simple life and growth is Man’s function, as plants do the same, and he discards that living a perceptive life is Man’s function, as animals do the same.